Started By
Message

re: Roy Moore is Automatically Innocent and Louis CK is Automatically Guilty

Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:41 pm to
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
41293 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

AggieDub14


What are you "winning" with this thread other than looking like you are defending one deviant over another?
Posted by DEG
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2009
10539 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:42 pm to
How does someone with 50k posts not know how to quote text on this board?
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:44 pm to
I'm not defending anyone. I'm simply trying to start a conversation on how this board is reacting to two different threads.
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20254 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

It's just disappointing to see one thread where everyone claims the girl is lying and that he is innocent until proven guilty, then another thread where he is automatically guilty.


This is nowhere close to accurate. There is a history of this type of activity/tactics on the Dem side with things like this for one. That goes a long way to establishing suspicion in the Moore story right off the bat.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73479 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

I'm simply trying to start a conversation on how this board is reacting to two different threads.
Well two different scenarios are well, two different scenarios.
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:47 pm to
People are still jumping to opposite conclusions which don't align with any system of values other than partisanship
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

I'm simply trying to start a conversation on how this board is reacting to two different threads.




No you're not. But that's ok. But be honest about what you are doing. You are trying to point out what you think is hypocrisy. It's not, of course, but you think it is, and are dang well going to point it out.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79867 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

It's just disappointing to see one thread where everyone claims the girl is lying and that he is innocent until proven guilty, then another thread where he is automatically guilty.


I don't know anything about the Louis CK thing, so I can't comment on it.

I do know that the timing of the Moore thing is, to say the least, suspect. Especially when there were numerous opportunities to take him down for it when he was a state legislator and judge.

If he were trailing by a substantial amount in the polls, the likelihood that this allegation would've ever seen the light of day is slim to none. And you know it.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73479 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

People are still jumping to opposite conclusions which don't align with any system of values other than partisanship
Oh for fricks sake, CK rumors have been out there for years.

Moore accusations timing is interesting and suspicious to say the least.


Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22786 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Muslim terrorists are religious people. And they are not good people.


They are if you adhere to their religion!

Of course saying you are a certain religion... any religion does not mean you are a good person.
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

I'm simply trying to start a conversation on how this board is reacting to two different threads.


quote:

You are trying to point out what you think is hypocrisy


Same thing?
Posted by TheHumanTornado
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since May 2008
3773 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 5:07 pm to
Poli board after McCain tweets about Moore: "DIE"

Poli Board every day: Liberals are violent filth scum.
Posted by TheMidasTouch
Member since Oct 2017
440 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 5:09 pm to
Spot on. It’s amazing but expected how much the tone of the comments differ for each of the accused.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33932 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 5:10 pm to
I love you, Daddy.
Posted by mattloc
Alabama
Member since Sep 2012
4315 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

How is a guy touching a 14 year old girls crotch over her underwear not pedophilia?


How is waiting to report this for 38 years not a reasonable doubt?
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
26034 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 5:13 pm to
I won't rest until NavyTiger weighs in since he has experience with this type of stuff.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 5:13 pm to
I started a fricking defend Weinstein thread. I’m the most consistent motherfricker on this board
Posted by mattloc
Alabama
Member since Sep 2012
4315 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

Roy Moore is Automatically Innocent and Louis CK is Automatically Guilty


Louis CK is not standing for a nationally important election in one month, against dirty political operatives... who have tried this same tactic repeatedly against Republicans
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124174 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Roy Moore is Automatically Innocent and Louis CK is Automatically Guilty
IDK WTH 'Louis CK' is. But in a "#metoo" world, NO ONE should be assumed guilty until veracity is established, and the case is made.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109044 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

One is a religious person and the other is a piece of crap.


I don’t think Louis CK is all that religious.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram