Started By
Message
locked post

Roy Moore is Automatically Innocent and Louis CK is Automatically Guilty

Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:05 pm
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:05 pm
Double Standard. Be consistent people.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101467 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:05 pm to
Sweet melt.
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20233 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:06 pm to
Whatever!
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

Double Standard. Be consistent people.


Both are innocent until proven guilty.
Posted by TheXman
Middle America
Member since Feb 2017
2975 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:06 pm to
If you can't see they are completely different situations, I don't know what to tell you.
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:06 pm to
It's just disappointing to see one thread where everyone claims the girl is lying and that he is innocent until proven guilty, then another thread where he is automatically guilty. These posters have no values. They are just picking a side and echoing the chamber. Pathetic.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140552 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:07 pm to
Whine threads are best
Posted by cajuncarguy
On the road...Again!
Member since Jun 2013
3135 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:07 pm to
[quote]Roy Moore is Automatically Innocent and Louis CK is Automatically Guilty[/quote

You know why? One is a religious person and the other is a piece of crap.

Obvious.
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:08 pm to
Oh so being a religious person automatically makes you a good person? Muslim terrorists are religious people. And they are not good people.
This post was edited on 11/9/17 at 2:09 pm
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64366 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:08 pm to
Grabbing your pillow again?

Please quote those who said those things in your op so we know your not a pathetic liar
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Be consistent people.


You said people were defending a pedophile in a thread that had no parameters for pedophilia. How about learning what in the frick you are talking about.
Posted by subotic
Member since Dec 2012
2358 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:08 pm to
Call them out by name or shut the frick up.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:08 pm to
So. I've read a grand total of about 4 paragraphs.

1st thing that stands out.

2002 vs 1979.

Then, I get to this.

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, after years of unsubstantiated rumors about Louis C.K. masturbating in front of associates
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh. So this didn't fall from space like the other case? Interesting.

And then this.....

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The stories told by the women raise sharp questions about the anecdotes that Louis C.K. tells in his own comedy. He rose to fame in part by appearing to be candid about his flaws and sexual hang-ups, discussing and miming masturbation extensively in his act — an exaggerated riff that some of the women feel may have served as a cover for real misconduct. He has all but invited comparison between his private life and his onscreen work, too: In “I Love You, Daddy,” which is scheduled to be released next week, a character pretends to masturbate at length in front of other people, and other characters appear to dismiss rumors of sexual predation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


So. OK.

Is there some reason we're pretending the two cases are similar other than you guys being scum?
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Roy Moore


What did he do? I feel if I don't pay attention for an hour I miss out on like 3 dudes getting accused of misusing their dicks!
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:09 pm to
How is a guy touching a 14 year old girls crotch over her underwear not pedophilia?
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53018 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:09 pm to
I agree. It's past time to merge the democrat and sex offender registries
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:09 pm to
It's the entire thread bro. Go read it.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

It's just disappointing to see one thread where everyone claims the girl is lying and that he is innocent until proven guilty,


You do realize that the cases are noticeably different, right?

Or, are you guys all so simple minded that you think all accusations of sexual harassment are equally viable?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67964 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:09 pm to
Damn, someone should have paid some women to make shite up about Northam.

Seems to be the standard tactic these days.
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:10 pm to
I guess message board judgement is the end all
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram