Started By
Message

Respect for Marriage Act passed by Senate. Goes to House for final vote.

Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:36 am
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45783 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:36 am
Gotta get this in as quick as possible before the new House gets seated. Lord knows, they don't have anything else to deal with. It's not like we have rampant inflation, out of control immigration, crime and murder rates. No, they know how to tackle the important stuff, like trampling morality for the sake of votes.

By the way, here's a list of the 12 RINO'S who voted with 50 Dems, allowing it to pass.

Roy Blunt, MO
Richard Burr, NC
Shelley Moore Capito, WV
Susan Collins, ME
Joni Ernst, IA
Cynthia Lummis, WY
Lisa Murkowski, AK
Rob Portman, OH
Mitt Romney, UT
Dan Sullivan, AK
Thom Tillis, NC
Todd Young, IN
Posted by PrecedentedTimes
Member since Dec 2020
3128 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:44 am to
If it prevents another SCOTUS bomb from hitting us in 2024, so be it.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
11149 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 2:02 am to
Like we need another reason to despise them.

quote:

Lord knows, they don't have anything else to deal with.

But this gets all the attention and action.

Respect for childhood innocence coming next?
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35669 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 2:26 am to
What does that bill do that’s not already deemed legal?
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
11149 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 3:23 am to
quote:

What does that bill do that’s not already deemed legal?


quote:

The RFMA as it stands doesn’t just repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as between male and female, by codifying the Supreme Court’s approval of same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges.

It goes further by enabling LGBT activists, who have already made a habit of exploiting the legal system to target religious Americans, and the politically motivated Department of Justice to bring civil action against anyone they say violates the terms of the legislation.

Under the guise of vague language, the RFMA could allow for the legal victimization of wedding vendors, adoption agencies, bakeries, and any other entities run by people of faith who refuse to offer services condoning same-sex marriage based on religious convictions.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/11/29/12-gop-senators-help-democrats-erode-americans-right-to-act-on-religious-convictions-about-marriage/
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
34783 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 3:29 am to
Is there really any reason to oppose this bill? Some things just don’t seem worth the fight unless there is some hidden BS crammed in that I don’t know about
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67980 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 3:59 am to

In order to respect a marriage,

it is a prerequisite that a marriage be in existence.
Posted by DemGaters
Member since Apr 2010
442 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:14 am to
quote:

unless there is some hidden BS crammed in


Bruh, there's ALWAYS hidden BS
Posted by Chaka
Member since Aug 2022
40 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:19 am to
A victory for love
Posted by wryder1
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2008
4179 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:20 am to
quote:

Under the guise of vague language, the RFMA could allow for the legal victimization of wedding vendors, adoption agencies, bakeries, and any other entities run by people of faith who refuse to offer services condoning same-sex marriage based on religious convictions.


So now their right to marriage is greater than our right to practice our religious freedoms. I want to see them make a Muslim church marry them in Dearborn, Michigan and force a Muslim restaraunt to cater it as well. Go as hard on them as the Colorado baker.
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37653 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:14 am to
quote:

It goes further by enabling LGBT activists, who have already made a habit of exploiting the legal system to target religious Americans, and the politically motivated Department of Justice to bring civil action against anyone they say violates the terms of the legislation.

Under the guise of vague language, the RFMA could allow for the legal victimization of wedding vendors, adoption agencies, bakeries, and any other entities run by people of faith who refuse to offer services condoning same-sex marriage based on religious convictions.


This is also why they refused to consider Mike Lee's amendment
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50540 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:20 am to
quote:

Is there really any reason to oppose this bill?


It basically legalizes religious persecution, so that part makes it unconstitutional and I look forward to it getting thrown out in court. They should have added Mike Lee's amendment.

If you ignore that huge part that makes it unconstitutional and dangerous, it's actually better than the Obergefell ruling. It doesn't force states to issue "marriage" licenses and simply requires them to recognize "marriage" licenses issued in other states.
This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 6:13 am
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:24 am to
quote:

§ 1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof

(a) In General.—No person acting under color of State law may deny—

(1) full faith and credit to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State pertaining to a marriage between 2 individuals, on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals; or

(2) a right or claim arising from such a marriage on the basis that such marriage would not be recognized under the law of that State on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals.
Posted by burger bearcat
Member since Oct 2020
8867 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:42 am to
quote:

This is also why they refused to consider Mike Lee's amendment




Useless Republicans can't even figure out how to negotiate anything to our favor. They just give everything away, f*cking useless whores.
Posted by interdesting
Member since Dec 2020
191 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:44 am to
From “no one should care what goes on in the privacy of our homes” (Lawrence v. Texas) to this. Moral relativism is the slippery slope of progressives that only leads to hell.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
10930 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:53 am to
quote:

The Dis-Respect for Marriage Act passed by Senate. Goes to House for final vote.


FIFY
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80161 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:55 am to
Who gives a shite, the govt shouldn’t be in the marriage business anyway.
Posted by burger bearcat
Member since Oct 2020
8867 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:07 am to
quote:

Who gives a shite, the govt shouldn’t be in the marriage business anyway.


You are contradicting yourself. On one hand, this bill gives the government even more authority over marriage, and you say who gives a shite, and then on the other hand you say government shouldn't be involved. Ehich is it?
This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 8:14 am
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
30734 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:36 am to
Can the Catholic Church be sued for refusing to marry a gay couple?
Posted by MRF
Member since Dec 2021
822 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:37 am to
1996: 85-14 DOMA
2022: 61-36 RFMA

What an incredible cultural decline in 26 years. And it’s only accelerating.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram