- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Respect for Marriage Act passed by Senate. Goes to House for final vote.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:22 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:22 am to AggieHank86
quote:God forbid that we look at the actual language of the legislation, when arguing about what the legislation does.
§ 1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof
(a) In General.—No person acting under color of State law may deny—
(1) full faith and credit to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State pertaining to a marriage between 2 individuals, on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals; or
(2) a right or claim arising from such a marriage on the basis that such marriage would not be recognized under the law of that State on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals.
2
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:23 am to SOSFAN
quote:
Heterosexuals ruined the purity of marriage many many years ago. How many kids grow up in divorced families. How many straight marriages end due to adultery. A gay couple living together with a piece of paper that gives them the same legal rights that other tax payers receive doesn't effect anyone else. Sweep your own porch first hypocrites
I love how that is being down voted. Funny you can't handle facts thrown in your face. You can hate the statement but it's still TRUE.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:23 am to interdesting
quote:Tell us EXACTLY what it is that you think this legislation does.
From “no one should care what goes on in the privacy of our homes” (Lawrence v. Texas) to this.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:24 am to loogaroo
quote:Not under this legislation, no.
Can the Catholic Church be sued for refusing to marry a gay couple?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:27 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Tell us EXACTLY what it is that you think this legislation does.
Tell us EXACTLY what your top 3, go-to sources for unbiased, unimpeachable Media are.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:28 am to SOSFAN
quote:
Let me ask everyone if homosexuals changed the name from Gay marriage to Civil Union and performed at city hall and not a church would you still have issues?
Nope.
In reality, I don't think the government should be in the marriage business to start with.
However, this crusade has never been about equal rights, it has been about the continued erosion of society...
No slippery slope, amirite?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:28 am to HubbaBubba
This is why you have to be a member of our church or denomination to get married in our building. We don’t allow unrepentant homosexuals into membership as it would be a violation of their membership vows.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:28 am to Snipe
quote:
Your question doesn't make sense. Try to rephrase it to make the point you're getting at a little more clear.
It makes perfect sense. You’re just retarded.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:29 am to LSUbest
have you read the language of the bill. Its very short, and could be interpeted by the current SCOTUS as to give the right back to the states.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:30 am to Flats
quote:
wasn't legal for gay people to enter into contracts?
Not as a couple with the same rights as heteros that are married.
If a gay couple work, pay taxes, own property why should they not be allowed to have the same legal rights as a straight couple? Marriage is certified by the government not the church that's why you have to have a marriage license. Government issues that license not the Church. Gay citizens should have the same government legal rights as heteros otherwise it's discrimination and unconstitutional.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:30 am to AggieHank86
quote:
It doesn't force states to issue "marriage" licenses and simply requires them to recognize "marriage" licenses issued in other states.
The marriages may be performed elsewhere but all states are forced to recognize same sex marriage. What about states rights?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:31 am to Snipe
quote:It makes perfect sense, in the context of the original comment posted above.quote:Do you not consider all the marriages between atheists or other religions to be valid?
Thay long ago interjected themselves into "marriage" which was and still IS a union of a man and a woman ordained by God through his churchquote:
Your question doesn't make sense. Try to rephrase it to make the point you're getting at a little more clear.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:31 am to LSUbest
quote:
enabling LGBT activists, who have already made a habit of exploiting the legal system to target religious Americans, and the politically motivated Department of Justice to bring civil action against anyone they say violates the terms of the legislation.
Does this mean mandatory gay cakes? Like, with a little Mickey Goldstein and agspank holding sacks on top?
This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 8:33 am
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:32 am to SOSFAN
did you really just quote yourself because you were butthurt about downvotes? Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:33 am to AubieinNC2009
quote:No, they have not … despite my posting the operative language in this thread … twice.
have you read the language of the bill.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:33 am to Esquire
quote:
Do you not consider all the marriages between atheists or other religions to be valid?
No, not all of them. Divorce and remarriage is an invalid marriage in most cases and adultery. And marriage is between a man and a woman.
#readyourbible
This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 8:34 am
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:34 am to Pelican fan99
Always assume there is BS built into a bill. Unless it’s one page long and clearly stated otherwise.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:35 am to JiminyCricket
quote:
you really just quote yourself because you were butthurt about downvotes?
Actually to be honest I did it to see which one would get more down voted. I don't get butthurt over the opinions of people I don't know nor never will.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:35 am to HubbaBubba
All that got 'codified' here is what a thoroughly depraved, degenerate nation that this has become.
Anyone that doesn't believe this will be used to further lawfare-style persecution of religious and moral business-owners and individuals is criminally naive.
The whole idiotic homo marriage degeneracy is what opened the door to all this drag-queen, tranny child-mutilation, freak-show perversion, that has overtaken the culture. The country has devolved into a noxious sewer. Certainly no longer the kind of country I'd pledge allegiance to anymore.
Anyone that doesn't believe this will be used to further lawfare-style persecution of religious and moral business-owners and individuals is criminally naive.
The whole idiotic homo marriage degeneracy is what opened the door to all this drag-queen, tranny child-mutilation, freak-show perversion, that has overtaken the culture. The country has devolved into a noxious sewer. Certainly no longer the kind of country I'd pledge allegiance to anymore.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 8:35 am to SOSFAN
quote:
Let me ask everyone if homosexuals changed the name from Gay marriage to Civil Union and performed at city hall and not a church would you still have issues?
:whatyearisitmeme:
Page 3 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News