- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Republicans Fail to See the Biggest Issue Costing them Undecided Voters
Posted on 8/30/24 at 9:24 am to imjustafatkid
Posted on 8/30/24 at 9:24 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
"Health of the mother" isn't even relevant because ending a pregnancy over life and death risks has always been allowed and has never been illegal. Women have always had the right to choose between themselves and their babies in life and death scenarios and that has not changed.
There are situations that arent immediate life and death issues but that can still impact a woman's health and their ability to conceive at a later date. You also left out fetal viability and birth defects as reasons for exceptions and there are a lot of those cases.
Posted on 8/30/24 at 9:30 am to Norbert
quote:
I wonder if I think really hard I can find some differences between a primitive fetus that has never possessed consciousness or felt pain, etc.
Their current condition would be identical to the one you posted
No sweat though, I dont want you people having children. Abort away, the world is better without your offspring.
Posted on 8/30/24 at 9:34 am to Norbert
quote:
It’s not a child yet.
If performed in the first month and a half or so, it’s very primitive.
Can you provide any evidence to support your opinion or is it just your opinion?
What data can you point to that is proof that the organism forming in utero is in fact not to be considered a child?
This post was edited on 8/30/24 at 9:39 am
Posted on 8/30/24 at 9:40 am to RFK
quote:
But they see the issue not necessarily as one of a decision to have an abortion or not, but as a politician making a choice for them that they feel should be their’s to make, whatever that choice may be.
It's weird none of these types of people are lobbying for the legalization of heroin. What makes them so obsessed with having the right to kill babies.
Posted on 8/30/24 at 9:41 am to Raz4back
quote:
It's weird none of these types of people are lobbying for the legalization of heroin
Probably in secret.
These people are the modern "lotus eaters."
Posted on 8/30/24 at 9:41 am to TigerBaitOohHaHa
quote:
Most of my Democrat family members think Roe v Wade was the name of the law, rather than a court ruling. They think Donald Trump personally over turned this law and that he will make abortion permanently illegal if voted into office, despite him 1) not having the power to do so unilaterally and 2) despite him consistently saying he wouldn't do so and that he is personally in favor of allowing abortions with some limit like 10 weeks or 12 weeks. and 3) not realizing that its still legal in most states.
Herein lies the problem.
1) Most people are so ignorant to the processes of checks and balances that they cannot spot inaccurate claims when they're repeated at them.
2) The media will repeat a lie over and over again to the point that people accept it as fact. There is an abundance of low info voters who gobble this stuff up and cannot critically think.
Posted on 8/30/24 at 9:45 am to RFK
quote:
a politician making a choice for them that they feel should be their’s to make, whatever that choice may be.
Politicians make decisions for us all the fricking time. The reality is that the vast majority of women want their cake and the option to murder it for being inconvenient
Posted on 8/30/24 at 9:56 am to ThuperThumpin
quote:
There are situations that arent immediate life and death issues but that can still impact a woman's health and their ability to conceive at a later date.
O.k., but are women not expected to take any responsibility for the consequences of choosing to have sex at all?
Is the unborn human expected to bear the consequence for all of them?
Posted on 8/30/24 at 9:58 am to RFK
quote:
Regardless, the GOP should stop dragging themselves down with this issue for political reasons.
I think people should stop allowing themselves to be drug down by an issue that has nothing to do with the federal government.
It never should have been in the hands of the federal government.
I guess your female family members are very smart afterall. It's a state issue.
Posted on 8/30/24 at 10:00 am to RFK
Abortion is where it should be. In the states hands.
It's the lying about nation wide abortion bans.
It's the lying about nation wide abortion bans.
Posted on 8/30/24 at 10:00 am to RFK
Women being the largest portion of undecided voters at this junction just further makes the case that women, by and large, should not be allowed to make important decisions for a nation. That's not misogynistic, that's fact.
Posted on 8/30/24 at 10:08 am to RFK
First, I want to say no matter how educated a person is to make a decision based on one issue instead of multiple issues as a whole is reckless, stupid and plain ignorant.
Secondly, politicians are not making these decisions, the voters are. So, whichever state you are in typically will reflect the majority of the voter's stance on issues like abortion.
Secondly, politicians are not making these decisions, the voters are. So, whichever state you are in typically will reflect the majority of the voter's stance on issues like abortion.
Posted on 8/30/24 at 10:13 am to ThuperThumpin
quote:
There are situations that arent immediate life and death issues but that can still impact a woman's health and their ability to conceive at a later date
...and? Let's kill this baby so maybe it doesn't happen next time? Stupid logic. They can make no such guarantees and will never be able to do so.
quote:
You also left out fetal viability and birth defects as reasons for exceptions and there are a lot of those cases.
These are not justifications for murder. The only justification to terminate a pregnancy early is if the mother's life is in immediate danger. That's it. That's the list.
Posted on 8/30/24 at 10:14 am to RFK
quote:
Undecided Voters
I don't believe these exist in numbers that are big enough to make a difference anymore.
Posted on 8/30/24 at 10:19 am to Norbert
quote:When, exactly does it become a child, then?
It’s not a child yet.
From where I'm sitting, when a new life is conceived inside its mother, that new life is the child of its mother and father, as at that point, it has all the genetic information to be a unique and growing offspring.
Attempting to sanitize your language about it in order to, presumably, remove any valuation of it does not change what it is.
quote:And? A 6-month old human child in the womb is also very primitive compared to an adult human being. So is a newborn. "Primitive" is a relative term. Cake batter in the oven is a primitive cake, but if left alone until the right time, that cake will become less primitive and more mature, and something for others to enjoy. If left alone until the right time, the child will also become less "primitive" to be cared for and enjoyed.
If performed in the first month and a half or so, it’s very primitive
Essentially what you're saying is that life and value are conferred based on how developed a human being is. When does that line of thinking actually stop? Should the rape and murder of a a 10 year-old girl be treated less severely than the rape and murder of a 40 year-old woman because the younger is less developed and has not had the experiences and even productivity to society that the older has? Is the lack of full development a mitigating factor for the rape? I believe we tend to treat the rape and murder of a child with more emotional outrage and severity than when it happens to an adult, but you seem to be arguing that the younger and less developed a living human being is, the less we should care bout their humanity and value.
quote:All of those characteristics can be used to justify killing a child who has been born for 2 weeks. A 2 week-old child has no real consciousness, or at least self-consciousness. A bullet to the head could also result in no pain sensation in the death. "Horrible circumstances" can exist at all ages.
No consciousness. No pain sensation. No birth into a horrible set of circumstances.
There is nothing here that is unique to a child in the womb. Human beings can experience all of those in varying degrees at varying ages and stages of of development. There's a reason you have several comments responding to you about people in comas. You are using an arbitrary set of characteristics to justify the killing of children in the womb.
quote:To kill their children? What if a mother (or father) wants to make the "hard choice" to kill their 1 year-old because they realized they aren't cut out for parenthood? Why not leave that up to them and their doctor on how best to "humanely" dispose of their little hardship?
The mother and physicians should have the freedom to make that hard choice in those uncommon and terrible scenarios
Posted on 8/30/24 at 10:21 am to RFK
quote:
The number one issue that keeps them from fully embracing the GOP is their immovable stance on sex with children, but not for the reasons you might suspect. Neither of these women has ever had sex with children, and neither would personally have sex with children themselves nor support a close family member having sex with children. But they see the issue not necessarily as one of a decision to have an sex with children or not, but as a politician making a choice for them that they feel should be their’s to make, whatever that choice may be. I personally fail to see how involving the government in a healthcare decision like sex with children is any different from forcing vaccines on people (which these women, especially the ER physician, did not support). Regardless, the GOP should stop dragging themselves down with this issue for political reasons.
Heres the rub...I think murdering unborn children for convenience is evil. Just like me being against sex with children, it will never be something ill be ok with. There are people out there that like having sex with children and think it should be their right to do so. I think, just like those people, you, your wife and friend are scum. I wish I didnt have to share a country with lowlifes like you.
Posted on 8/30/24 at 10:24 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
The issue of abortion isn’t necessarily only about killing a growing fetus. It’s about the IVF issue. You can’t sit back and call every woman who is dying to become a mother and spending thousands upon thousands of dollars to do so a fricking sinner and baby killer then expect these women to happily vote for you.
Holy gaslight Batman
Posted on 8/30/24 at 10:27 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
and? Let's kill this baby so maybe it doesn't happen next time? Stupid logic. They can make no such guarantees and will never be able to do so.
You are given a choice. Your wife is told .you can continue with the pregnancy that may end up unviable and causing your wife health complications in the future or terminate the pregnancy. Thats not an easy answer for most rational people.
quote:
These are not justifications for murder. The only justification to terminate a pregnancy early is if the mother's life is in immediate danger. That's it. That's the list.
Keep pushing that being the only exception when 80-90% of the country disagrees..
Posted on 8/30/24 at 10:32 am to RFK
so muh drumpf banned all abortions? really? link?
educate the dumbass women in your life.
you are a LOSER AND FAILURE
educate the dumbass women in your life.
you are a LOSER AND FAILURE
Posted on 8/30/24 at 10:41 am to Nighttrainlane12
quote:
So if 90 percent of the country wants me to jump off the GW bridge I should do it.
You dont have to do anything. Nobody is going to force you to have an abortion.
Popular
Back to top



2







