- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question for the Joggers of Political Talk
Posted on 5/8/20 at 8:44 am to fatheadgator
Posted on 5/8/20 at 8:44 am to fatheadgator
quote:
and we only had GZ’s version of the story.
Nope.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 8:45 am to Turbeauxdog
Nah just trying to give the less fortunate a pat on the back.
Maybe one day your brain will return to your skull.
Maybe one day your brain will return to your skull.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 8:46 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
Nah just trying to give the less fortunate a pat on the back.
Maybe one day your brain will return to your skull
More emotions.
You ever finish your Trayvon mural in your moms basement? Can I get a high res picture for my desktop background?
Posted on 5/8/20 at 8:47 am to Turbeauxdog
You are literally the only one bringing up Trayvon bud.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 8:48 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:You can’t call someone emotional and then take emotional jabs without looking like a hypocrite.
More emotions.
You ever finish your Trayvon mural in your moms basement? Can I get a high res picture for my desktop background?
Posted on 5/8/20 at 8:51 am to ell_13
quote:
You can’t call someone emotional and then take emotional jabs without looking like a hypocrite.
Agreed, what’s that have to do with my hilarious post?
Posted on 5/8/20 at 8:55 am to Korkstand
quote:good survival instincts
One thousand out of one thousand times, if I am face to face with an armed man who clearly does not intend to let me go, I will try to take the gun. No doubt about it.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 9:15 am to fatheadgator
quote:
why isn’t TM allowed to claim “self defense”
He doubled back and became the aggressor.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 9:20 am to Azkiger
quote:
Anyways it doesn't effect this case, the only way this is justified is if the truck guys saw him committing a felony *at the time*. That's the only way citizens arrests are allowed in Georiga.
Yeah, they're in it pretty thick. And, Jake is right - the local law enforcement and DA are going to be under a lot of scrutiny after this as well.
I mean, I get it - if there is a sudden uptick in incidents and you "think" you know who did it, the instinct is strong to "do something" about it. But, it's just property and they don't know this cat did any of them (other than the trespassing, which is both pretty clear and strongly suggestive, but not damning and certainly not worthy of the death penalty they imposed).
So, there is all of that.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 9:26 am to Manzielathon
quote:
He was a jogger. He LOVED jogging. Been jogging his whole life. Truly a passion of his, he even had a scholarship to Jogging University. So why would he not just keep jogging?
Would you turn your back on someone pointing a gun at you?
I may die, but I'm going to die fighting.
Maybe you're just a coward.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 10:14 am to Powerman
Their actions can not be defended
You CANNOT chase someone down that is not an immediate threat to you. End of story, nothing else to discuss.
If he was in my home he would likely have met the same fate, but not otherwise.
You CANNOT chase someone down that is not an immediate threat to you. End of story, nothing else to discuss.
If he was in my home he would likely have met the same fate, but not otherwise.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 10:36 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
He doubled back and became the aggressor.
He felt threatened by GZ ...doubled back and GZ was still hunting him ...-
Posted on 5/8/20 at 10:37 am to shawnlsu
quote:
You CANNOT chase someone down that is not an immediate threat to you. End of story, nothing else to discuss.
In Georgia you absolutely can legally.
That’s going to be reality, you should work on acceptance.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 11:24 am to Turbeauxdog
Link? Because I call BS. You can't do that anywhere.
If a person is not an immediate threat to you or your family and on your property, all bets are off. If that person is fleeing, you have lost your mind if you think you are going to get away with chasing them down the road and killing them.
If a person is not an immediate threat to you or your family and on your property, all bets are off. If that person is fleeing, you have lost your mind if you think you are going to get away with chasing them down the road and killing them.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 11:28 am to shawnlsu
quote:
Link? Because I call BS. You can't do that anywhere.
If a person is not an immediate threat to you or your family and on your property, all bets are off. If that person is fleeing, you have lost your mind if you think you are going to get away with chasing them down the road and killing them
You’re emotional and all over the place.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 11:30 am to Turbeauxdog
nm
This post was edited on 5/8/20 at 11:31 am
Posted on 5/8/20 at 11:33 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
other than the trespassing, which is both pretty clear and strongly suggestive, but not damning and certainly not worthy of the death penalty they imposed).
To know it was trespassing they would need to know he had no legitimate purpose for being at that property at that particular time. Did they call the home owner before heading out to chase him down?
Posted on 5/8/20 at 11:36 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
Did they call the home owner before heading out to chase him down?
We don’t know what the homeowner told them.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 11:37 am to Turbeauxdog
So what if the homeowner told them he was robbed?
He wasn’t. So they’re still up shite creek.
He wasn’t. So they’re still up shite creek.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 11:39 am to Turbeauxdog
Again, the initial police report contradicts claims of immediate knowledge. They saw him well enough one night that they could see him reach in his pants, which was the justification they used for grabbing weapons. They thought they recognized him from an earlier incident.
Popular
Back to top


1






