- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/8/18 at 5:51 am to DragginFly
quote:
He had Cohen use campaign $s to pay whores.
quote:
I thought he used his own money.
He did, but there are individual limits to campaign contributions ($2700/person) and this was >40x that. It occurred in the weeks before the election and Cohen has testified that the payoff was meant to influence the outcome of an election thus it's hard to argue that it's not campaign spending. He also testified that he did it in coordination and at the direction of Individual-1. Individual-1 is an un-indicted co-conspirator at this point.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 5:56 am to Jjdoc
This is another sign that they have nothing on Trump. They spent almost two years going Russia, Russia, Russia and now they are talking about Trump and some hookers before he was even president?
LOL, that investigation has turned into one big bust for the democrats and the media and now they are just trying to save face
LOL, that investigation has turned into one big bust for the democrats and the media and now they are just trying to save face
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:19 am to TigerDoc
quote:
He did, but there are individual limits to campaign contributions ($2700/person) and this was >40x that. It occurred in the weeks before the election and Cohen has testified that the payoff was meant to influence the outcome of an election thus it's hard to argue that it's not campaign spending.
the campaign finance statute specifically identifies items that would have existed outside the campaign are NOT campaign expenditures, thus Trump paying someone to stfu and go away, known in legal circles as a nuisance payment, is not a fricking campaign finance violation.
Has Trump ever made such payments outside the campaign, why yes he has.
Thanks, go away.
This post was edited on 12/8/18 at 6:20 am
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:26 am to Jjdoc
What in the fricking seven hells does a lawyer claiming to have made payments to a couple of ho's have to do with Russia?
The idiots in the MSM have completely lost it.
The idiots in the MSM have completely lost it.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:28 am to TigerDoc
Or it could clearly have been to keep his marriage intact.
If he had used campaign funds, you’d be arguing it was illegal because he used campaign funds on a personal matter.
If he had used campaign funds, you’d be arguing it was illegal because he used campaign funds on a personal matter.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:33 am to More&Les
quote:
this is now a banned expression, beating dead horses and breaking camels' backs is insensitive toward and cruelty to Animals!
You monster!!!
As completely stupid and pointless PETA's argument was in that whole ordeal, I must admit their replacement phrases were surprisingly decent.
"Grab the flower by the thorns" instead of grabbing a bull by the horns
"Stop feeding a fed horse" instead of beating a dead horse
They'll never replace the originals, but I'll totally use them tongue-in-cheek.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:35 am to RazorBroncs
You’re right. Those are good for a laugh.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:38 am to Corch Urban Myers
quote:
Why would he use campaign funds? He's not a poor like Obama was.
It's pretty well known that obama's ex-lovers died in a hail of machine gun bullets in Chicago before the 2008 election. Someone was looking out for bath house barry.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:38 am to TigerAxeOK
quote:
What in the fricking seven hells does a lawyer claiming to have made payments to a couple of ho's have to do with Russia?
The MSM has known from day one that Trump didn't collude with the Russians on anything having to do with the election. They have willingly promoted the fake narrative to protect the Obama administration and Hillary's clear ties to Russia and the uranium one deal.
This post was edited on 12/8/18 at 6:42 am
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:45 am to TigerDoc
You do realize that all money used during a campaign is meant to influence an election? This term “influence an election” in regards to paying off women who could possibly cause problems is nothing new and at the most a campaign violation normallly settled with a fine like they did to the Obama campaign. Doesn’t take a special prosecutor
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:54 am to Jjdoc
quote:Poster badly in need of new material
Got him now
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:54 am to TigerDoc
quote:
He did, but there are individual limits to campaign contributions ($2700/person) and this was >40x that
Trump could use and spend as much of his on money ad he wants. He is not not capped sir.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:55 am to DragginFly
quote:
I thought he used his own money.
Draggin this is what I keep trying to figure out. He spent millions on his own campaign, so he paid with his own money.
Even if he did pay with campaign funds, its a minor violation, at most a fine....but then its Trump so....
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:57 am to Jjdoc
They will have to bend over backwards to say he did it specifically to influence the election. It is a gross overreach by Dems.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:57 am to shoelessjoe
quote:Much like no one much cared about Monica and Billy Jeff. It wasn’t the hummer, it was the lying under oath.
I have been typing and deleting trying to come up with a response to this but just can’t. What a bunch of idiots. Who cares who Trump fricked before he was President? It’s not against the law. It’s frowned upon if he cheated on his wife but not against the law. Trump deals with people all the time who are filing lawsuits so he settles out of court to make them go away. That’s all this is. A go away payment. Scram go away.
No one much cares that Trump was farking porn performers. The campaign finance violations, however, are a different matter.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 8:05 am to TigerDoc
quote:
He did, but there are individual limits to campaign contributions ($2700/person) and this was >40x that.
There are no limits on how much a candidate can donate to HIS OWN campaign.
But you probably knew that, but are being intentionally misleading.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 8:09 am to RazorBroncs
quote:
Stop feeding a fed horse" instead of beating a dead horse
if the fricking horse is dead you can't very well fricking feed can you?
and every flower doesn't have fricking thorns but every bull will gouge your arse with his fricking horns...
Posted on 12/8/18 at 8:10 am to AggieHank86
quote:
No one much cares that Trump was farking porn performers. The campaign finance violations, however, are a different matter.
there weren't any
Popular
Back to top


1









