Started By
Message

re: Prosecutors Say Trump Directed Illegal Payments During Campaign

Posted on 12/8/18 at 5:41 am to
Posted by Corch Urban Myers
Columbus, OH
Member since Jul 2009
5993 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 5:41 am to
Yeah of course he did, lol.

Why would he use campaign funds? He's not a poor like Obama was.


The idiocy of the left knows no bounds.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11844 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 5:51 am to
quote:

He had Cohen use campaign $s to pay whores.


quote:

I thought he used his own money.


He did, but there are individual limits to campaign contributions ($2700/person) and this was >40x that. It occurred in the weeks before the election and Cohen has testified that the payoff was meant to influence the outcome of an election thus it's hard to argue that it's not campaign spending. He also testified that he did it in coordination and at the direction of Individual-1. Individual-1 is an un-indicted co-conspirator at this point.
Posted by OverseasBengal
Member since Dec 2018
1107 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 5:56 am to
This is another sign that they have nothing on Trump. They spent almost two years going Russia, Russia, Russia and now they are talking about Trump and some hookers before he was even president?
LOL, that investigation has turned into one big bust for the democrats and the media and now they are just trying to save face
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:19 am to
quote:


He did, but there are individual limits to campaign contributions ($2700/person) and this was >40x that. It occurred in the weeks before the election and Cohen has testified that the payoff was meant to influence the outcome of an election thus it's hard to argue that it's not campaign spending.


the campaign finance statute specifically identifies items that would have existed outside the campaign are NOT campaign expenditures, thus Trump paying someone to stfu and go away, known in legal circles as a nuisance payment, is not a fricking campaign finance violation.

Has Trump ever made such payments outside the campaign, why yes he has.

Thanks, go away.
This post was edited on 12/8/18 at 6:20 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115241 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:20 am to
Oh

My

God...
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
37906 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:26 am to
What in the fricking seven hells does a lawyer claiming to have made payments to a couple of ho's have to do with Russia?

The idiots in the MSM have completely lost it.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24080 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:28 am to
Or it could clearly have been to keep his marriage intact.

If he had used campaign funds, you’d be arguing it was illegal because he used campaign funds on a personal matter.
Posted by RazorBroncs
Possesses the largest
Member since Sep 2013
16174 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:33 am to
quote:

this is now a banned expression, beating dead horses and breaking camels' backs is insensitive toward and cruelty to Animals! 

You monster!!!



As completely stupid and pointless PETA's argument was in that whole ordeal, I must admit their replacement phrases were surprisingly decent.

"Grab the flower by the thorns" instead of grabbing a bull by the horns

"Stop feeding a fed horse" instead of beating a dead horse

They'll never replace the originals, but I'll totally use them tongue-in-cheek.

Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
32831 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:35 am to
You’re right. Those are good for a laugh.
Posted by LakeCharles
USA
Member since Oct 2016
5419 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:38 am to
quote:

Why would he use campaign funds? He's not a poor like Obama was.




It's pretty well known that obama's ex-lovers died in a hail of machine gun bullets in Chicago before the 2008 election. Someone was looking out for bath house barry.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62079 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 6:38 am to
quote:

What in the fricking seven hells does a lawyer claiming to have made payments to a couple of ho's have to do with Russia?



The MSM has known from day one that Trump didn't collude with the Russians on anything having to do with the election. They have willingly promoted the fake narrative to protect the Obama administration and Hillary's clear ties to Russia and the uranium one deal.
This post was edited on 12/8/18 at 6:42 am
Posted by Johnpettigrew
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2017
1744 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:45 am to
You do realize that all money used during a campaign is meant to influence an election? This term “influence an election” in regards to paying off women who could possibly cause problems is nothing new and at the most a campaign violation normallly settled with a fine like they did to the Obama campaign. Doesn’t take a special prosecutor
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Got him now
Poster badly in need of new material
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55613 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:54 am to
quote:

He did, but there are individual limits to campaign contributions ($2700/person) and this was >40x that


Trump could use and spend as much of his on money ad he wants. He is not not capped sir.

Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
19934 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:55 am to
quote:

I thought he used his own money.



Draggin this is what I keep trying to figure out. He spent millions on his own campaign, so he paid with his own money.

Even if he did pay with campaign funds, its a minor violation, at most a fine....but then its Trump so....
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23484 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:57 am to
They will have to bend over backwards to say he did it specifically to influence the election. It is a gross overreach by Dems.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:57 am to
quote:

I have been typing and deleting trying to come up with a response to this but just can’t. What a bunch of idiots. Who cares who Trump fricked before he was President? It’s not against the law. It’s frowned upon if he cheated on his wife but not against the law. Trump deals with people all the time who are filing lawsuits so he settles out of court to make them go away. That’s all this is. A go away payment. Scram go away.
Much like no one much cared about Monica and Billy Jeff. It wasn’t the hummer, it was the lying under oath.

No one much cares that Trump was farking porn performers. The campaign finance violations, however, are a different matter.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
35483 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 8:05 am to
quote:


He did, but there are individual limits to campaign contributions ($2700/person) and this was >40x that.


There are no limits on how much a candidate can donate to HIS OWN campaign.

But you probably knew that, but are being intentionally misleading.
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Stop feeding a fed horse" instead of beating a dead horse


if the fricking horse is dead you can't very well fricking feed can you?

and every flower doesn't have fricking thorns but every bull will gouge your arse with his fricking horns...
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 12/8/18 at 8:10 am to
quote:


No one much cares that Trump was farking porn performers. The campaign finance violations, however, are a different matter.


there weren't any
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram