Started By
Message

Professor’s redefinition of pedophilia could help pedophiles rights

Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:29 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146732 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:29 am
quote:


Old Dominion Ph.D. Allyn Walker (inset) says pedophilia ought to be destigmatized by calling kid predators "minor-attracted persons."

On Nov. 8, Old Dominion sociology and criminology professor Allyn Walker gave an interview in which he asserted the need to destigmatize pedophiles by redefining them as “minor-attracted persons” (MAPs). Walker stated, “We have a tendency to want to categorize people with these attractions as evil or morally corrupt,” and that when people “hear the term ‘pedophile,’ they automatically assume that it means a sex offender, and that isn’t true.”

Shortly after this interview, students at Old Dominion protested over the professor’s attempt to obfuscate the nature of sexual predators. Although the university furloughed Walker, the professor continued to defend his stance while attacking his critics as hostile to academic freedom and misguided by “rightwing media.”

The Walker incident is not a standalone event. In fact, his advocacy for pedophiles highlights the crisis that critical theory poses for higher education, as it attempts to dismantle every social taboo and normalize every form of immoral conduct.

nypost.com

Demoralization.

Anybody else remember years ago on this very forum: When they first pushed LGBTQURS tranny rights... The progfilth called us nuts when we said the next perversion will be pedos normalized?

"minor-attracted persons." YCMTSU!
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
16416 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:31 am to
quote:

"minor-attracted persons."


or they could be called Marxist, Commie Democrats.

That'd be a proper start.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98763 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:32 am to
"he"

Lololololololol
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64658 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:32 am to
quote:

pedophiles rights


Let us pray
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140409 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:33 am to
The tranny boy klan is so awesome.
Posted by USMCguy121
Northshore
Member since Aug 2021
6332 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:34 am to
they really think they're untouchable, it seems.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146732 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:34 am to


Allyn Walker is a transgender female – a biological male – who identifies as “non-binary.” Walker also teaches at ODU.



nonbinary
[?nän'bin?re]
ADJECTIVE
non-binary (adjective)
not relating to, composed of, or involving just two things.
"Aristotelian ontology is nonbinary on the second level in that it allows for degrees of being"
denoting or relating to a gender or sexual identity that is not defined in terms of traditional binary oppositions such as male and female or homosexual and heterosexual.
"nonbinary people are vastly underrepresented in the media"
relating to, using, or denoting a system of numerical notation that does not have 2 as a base.
"the enumeration data is stored in a nonbinary format"
This post was edited on 1/2/22 at 9:37 am
Posted by dakarx
Member since Sep 2018
6839 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:34 am to
quote:

 the term ‘pedophile,’ they automatically assume that it means a sex offender, and that isn’t true.”


Yeah, by definition it is. Regardless how you explain it away....
Posted by Onyx Aggie
Foothills of the Smokies
Member since Sep 2012
2395 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Allyn Walker gave an interview in which he


That does not jive with this:



Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41675 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:37 am to
And rapists are just “surprise-sex enthusiasts”

Words have meanings for a reason.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46508 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:39 am to
In some ways he’s correct, as if you’re attracted to pre-pubescent children you’re a pedophile whether you’ve ever actually done anything to a child. The attraction alone makes you by definition a pedophile.

But then the question is what do you do with these people? Shouldn’t we want them to come forward and get help? It seems to me that would save more kids than demanding they repress it for 80 years on their own, because humans are REALLY bad about repressing sexual urges forever.

I want to know who all the pedophiles are, it lets us help the ones who can be helped and monitor the ones who can’t.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67906 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:40 am to

Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2012
13538 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:40 am to
quote:

or they could be called Marxist, Commie Democrats.


I would prefer to call them dead.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34141 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:41 am to
Paging gadknot
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45756 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:42 am to
quote:

the professor continued to defend his stance while attacking his critics 
That's a dude, or a dudette?

Either way, if our FBI weren't compromised, you'd think an investigation of this individual's computer files and search history might be in order.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46508 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:43 am to
quote:

And rapists are just “surprise-sex enthusiasts”

Words have meanings for a reason.



But that’s just it, there are many pedophiles who’ve never touched a kid. Many of them will someday though given enough time. At present, we just demand they stay silent until we catch them doing something and then we prosecute them. That plan works great unless you’re the kids they molest before they’re caught.

Im saying we should have help available for pedophiles who acknowledge the potential harm of their attractions as opposed to what we currently do.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34141 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Shouldn’t we want them to come forward and get help?


The goal of the left is acceptance, not assistance. If you don’t see that, then nothing that I write will change your mind.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146732 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:46 am to
Good post as far as them needing mental health help. But don't you think the simple admiration of a child is a far stretch from wanting to molest them sexually?

'Look how cute that baby is,' is a far cry from wanting to molest them sexually.

This Professor pointing this out in a twisted formation of words makes him the perversion for protecting the perversion by twisting innocuous meanings with pedo thoughts of molestations, no?

This post was edited on 1/2/22 at 9:58 am
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34141 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Im saying we should have help available for pedophiles who acknowledge the potential harm of their attractions as opposed to what we currently do.


Are you suggesting that they are being turned away by therapists?

In short, the it would seem as though help is already available. It just is being ignored.

You are being disingenuous in your take.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46508 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 9:47 am to
quote:

The goal of the left is acceptance, not assistance. If you don’t see that, then nothing that I write will change your mind.



Accepting the molestation of children should never be tolerated, but helping these people (and thus helping children not get molested) does start with an acknowledgement many of you are unwilling to make: That some people are just attracted to children through no fault or choice of their own.

If you can’t acknowledge that, you can’t help those people because your answer will always be “well stop being attracted to them”.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram