
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Press Secretary Zacharia does a good job of explaining the controversy
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:20 pm to DeBoar
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:20 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Only because he looks like a fool after projecting there wouldn’t be one
This seems to be the truth and I honestly don't know if I've ever seen anything more petty in my life.
Maybe the thread asking people to ask their SI of choice what it thought about him as a poster? I mean, that thread was pretty bad too. But this is two threads now and you can bet this one is going to go another 20 pages rehashing the exact same arguments that were just had in the OTHER 20 page thread on nearly the same subject. He and fellow hater Jim Everett are already off to a great start.
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:20 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Zacharia has very little relevant experience. Watching her so far, I would be shocked if she did well in Moot Court in law school.
Whoopti do.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:21 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
Can you even imagine the subliminal message being sent. The former, who is married, leaves due to her newborn, which is her 2nd child and another takes the podium married with 4 kids and happy as she can be!!
I wonder how many in the MSM are that happy?
I wonder how many in the MSM are that happy?
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:25 pm to IvoryBillMatt
So she took the bar and the results are "inconsequential"
So she failed, right?
So she failed, right?
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:27 pm to BoarEd
quote:
hope it's not too late
Yes. They let the fact that she lied about the bar fester for two days. Other than you, no one believes her lie that she thought the reporters were asking "WHERE she went after LAW SCHOOL?"
They literally never said anything that sounded remotely like law school. Why would they be interested in WHERE she went in 2011??
She had known since Sunday that the press was asking the bar question of the White House. As pointed out before, TRUMP heard the question and asked her "which state?"
Watch the video yourself. Again, her job is to communicate. She knew the press would find out she failed the California bar (not a big deal). Why not just rip the band aid off? Dumb.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:29 pm to BoarEd
quote:
He and fellow hater Jim Everett are already off to a great start.
Yet you have posted far more in the threads than I have.
It is obvious you desperately want Trump's dick in your mouth but I can assure you that all your ridiculous defending everything he does will not get you the cum you so desperately crave.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
she took the bar and the results are "inconsequential"
Failing the California bar exam is inconsequential regarding her ability to perform the job as press secretary.
Being evasive about it and letting the press break the news was massively dumb. As you know, it's better to reveal potentially damaging material on your own terms before your opponent uses it against you.
ETA: Sorry SFP. I missed your point. It was vapid for her to say the result was "inconsequential":)
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:35 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Other than you, no one believes her lie that she thought the reporters were asking "WHERE she went after LAW SCHOOL?"
Right, so like I said, another thread for the exact same frickin' comments and arguments.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:36 pm to IvoryBillMatt
This is stuff she should have come clean about way ahead of time. If you’re anybody wanting a semblance of a public figure lifestyle, especially in politics, you have to be transparent and get ahead of anything that could be potentially weaponized against you.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:36 pm to JimEverett
quote:
JimEverett
This one really doesn't take kindly to being called a hater, folks.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:38 pm to Houston problem
Yep, Slippin' Jimmy has even made an appearance in this thread. A couple posts up from yours.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:39 pm to Jbird
quote:
corky go!
I'm so confused. So was my starting this thread one of the many anti-Trump threads you predicted I would start? Wouldn't it have been better for my hidden Trump agenda just to ignore it?
I thought it was interesting. Maybe you didn't. Do you have to make the same juvenile comments in response to me over and over? Don't you think that's tedious for other people on the Board?
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:41 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Right, so like I said, another thread for the exact same frickin' comments and arguments
You laughed when I said I hoped her interview wasn't too late. Was her interview part of any other thread???
If so, I missed it.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:41 pm to TouchdownAlabama
quote:
This is stuff she should have come clean about way ahead of time. If you’re anybody wanting a semblance of a public figure lifestyle, especially in politics, you have to be transparent and get ahead of anything that could be potentially weaponized against you.
Correct
Especially as a comms director, which is basically what the press secretary is.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:44 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
quote:
Can I change my vote to Kamala?
Have to admit that "Kamala would have been worse" is starting to sound a lot like "Anyone but Trump".
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:45 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Predicted?
Here's a prediction for you.
Twenty more anti Drumpf threads by you before the election.
Bank it Facade.
Here's a prediction for you.
Twenty more anti Drumpf threads by you before the election.
Bank it Facade.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:47 pm to Jbird
quote:
Twenty more anti Drumpf threads by you before the election.
Just so we're clear on terms, what constitutes an anti Drumpf thread? Is this one where I brought to the Board a favorable interview with Trump's press secretary an anti Drumpf thread?
Posted on 10/15/26 at 4:48 pm to IvoryBillMatt
One in a hundred brilliant.

Popular
Back to top


4










