Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Potential candidate for DNI: Elise Stefanik

Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:34 am
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
20412 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:34 am
The Hill
quote:

Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) on Friday floated Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) as a possible successor to outgoing Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard, saying the House Republican would likely have no trouble getting through the confirmation process.

“Stefanik would make a great replacement for Tulsi as DNI. Easily confirmable too,”



As I said. Tulsi stepping down could result in an upgrade for many of you.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
20203 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:36 am to
No thanks.

Pick a woman from the south. All the way south not half arse Tennessee or something.
This post was edited on 5/25/26 at 11:43 am
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68587 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:38 am to
Posted by Wraytex
San Antonio - Gonzales
Member since Jun 2020
4049 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Easily confirmable too




Considering who's doing the confirming, that's a big no for me.
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68873 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:40 am to
Stefanik is just another bootlicker, so it's pretty obvious...
Posted by spacecitydude
HTX
Member since Nov 2021
273 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:41 am to
I can confirm I would [not]
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
43983 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:44 am to
I hope we do not have to endure any more women as the titular heads of our intelligence or enforcement agencies.
Posted by tigrewoulds21
Member since May 2026
8 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Stefanik was awarded the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon Adelson Defender of Israel Award by the Zionist Organization of America.


That tracks.
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
20412 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:44 am to
quote:

I hope we do not have to endure any more women as the titular heads of our intelligence or enforcement agencies.



She's staunchly pro Israel. What's the issue?
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68873 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:49 am to
quote:

I hope we do not have to endure any more women as the titular heads of our intelligence or enforcement agencies.


Wimmin should stay in their place?
Posted by Jack Daniel
Gold member
Member since Feb 2013
29386 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:49 am to
quote:

easily confirmable

That’s a big red flag
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115563 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:49 am to
frick no
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
20412 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:50 am to
quote:

frick no



I haven't really seen any arguments as to why not.
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
3751 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:57 am to
Absolutely not
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5340 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

I haven't really seen any arguments as to why not.


I think after the last 10 years, the right has fully embraced the left's game. If the left supports something, the right is opposed. In other words, if Congressional democrats will vote for Stefanik, she's probably not our best option. Honestly, looking at how the previous democrat administration governed the country, it's hard to argue with that logic.
This post was edited on 5/25/26 at 12:14 pm
Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
6512 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

another bootlicker

Care to discuss your affinity for George Floyd's footwear?
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
9956 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Stefanik is just another bootlicker, so it's pretty obvious...


As opposed to all the other presidents in our history who actively sought to find people who would fight the goals of their administration.

Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
6512 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

I haven't really seen any arguments as to why not.

If the same dc rot that refuse to pass the save act will approve this candidate tells us all we need to know.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
20020 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 1:22 pm to
Why not Michael Flynn, it would be worth it just to see dems heads on fire
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram