- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Popular vote stats prove fraud in 2020
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:40 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:40 am to SlowFlowPro
It does appear there are between 13-17m votes remaining to count.
My guess would be she wins 65% of what’s left.
I initially thought there were less votes this time also, but happy to be wrong. That means Trump truly did well with Ind/Dems and will ultimately outperform his total vote from 2020.
My guess would be she wins 65% of what’s left.
I initially thought there were less votes this time also, but happy to be wrong. That means Trump truly did well with Ind/Dems and will ultimately outperform his total vote from 2020.
1
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:41 am to Stexas
She is projected to finish with 75 million votes compared to 81 million for Biden
She is going to be roughly 4 points weaker than Biden in the popular vote. 4 points less for someone as a sitting vice president that was awful and named and not voted for in a primary is not just reasonable but is right at expectations
I’m not saying fraud didn’t happen in 2020 but the data itself would say the vote total different between her and Biden is logical
She is going to be roughly 4 points weaker than Biden in the popular vote. 4 points less for someone as a sitting vice president that was awful and named and not voted for in a primary is not just reasonable but is right at expectations
I’m not saying fraud didn’t happen in 2020 but the data itself would say the vote total different between her and Biden is logical
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Obviously. But that line is based off tens of millions of votes not being counted. The final tally will align much more closely.
Bookmarked
This post was edited on 11/7/24 at 8:48 am
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:49 am to Stexas
quote:
TLDR: Today I was red pilled.
We have jackets.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:53 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
. Kamala is losing the state by 15K votes, but my favorite Senate candidate is only down by 4K, guess what happens.
Why leave our Kamala?
You still haven't explained that.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:57 am to OceanMan
quote:
So that would mean the remaining 7 million shortfall is not from the most populous state. 5% decrease nationally with no California impact. A What indications did we get that signaled lower turnout? Lower registrations? Decrease in voting age population? “Enthusiasm” is not a serious answer btw
I’m just saying until all the states get to 98 or 99% of the vote, it is too early to draw conclusions.
Right now it’s absurd to say that 15 million votes are missing when there are millions uncounted.
This post was edited on 11/7/24 at 9:25 am
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:58 am to lsupride87
quote:
I’m not saying fraud didn’t happen in 2020 but the data itself would say the vote total different between her and Biden is logical
Lots of people missing the point. The question is whether the increase in 2020 was reasonable. Obviously we can back into answers or reasoning for the vote count going down. But why should they be trusted in the first place?
Posted on 11/7/24 at 8:59 am to Stexas
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:02 am to Xenophon
quote:
I initially thought there were less votes this time also, but happy to be wrong. That means Trump truly did well with Ind/Dems and will ultimately outperform his total vote from 2020.
That is what people here are missing. Trump is going to surpass his vote total in 2020 by a lot.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:05 am to 2024GoTigas
CA 6,666,917
WA 1,180,219
OR 519,518
NV 87,308
AZ 1,069,086
UT 461,308
NY 495,505
AK 99,039
HI 56,927
IL 460,982
11,096,809
140,728,996
151,825,805
That puts the total at 155 million. That is 4 millions off and most states are at 96-97%, so add in another million there. total will be 2-3 millions off of 2020.
WA 1,180,219
OR 519,518
NV 87,308
AZ 1,069,086
UT 461,308
NY 495,505
AK 99,039
HI 56,927
IL 460,982
11,096,809
140,728,996
151,825,805
That puts the total at 155 million. That is 4 millions off and most states are at 96-97%, so add in another million there. total will be 2-3 millions off of 2020.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:10 am to SlowFlowPro
Ok throw Kamala in? She still loses and the senate candidate still wins.
You don’t have to be a fricking idiot you know.
You don’t have to be a fricking idiot you know.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:16 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You do realize millions of votes haven't been counted yet, right?
You do realize not nearly as many votes remain uncounted as would make up the huge deficit in numbers from the 2020 election.
You do realize you are an absolute fricking retard if you STILL believe Biden got 81 million votes and their was no widespread election fraud and election interference in 2020 that influenced the results.
You do realize your earnest in constantly proving to everyone that you're no "right wing conspiracy theorist," is annoying as frick and you're completely wrong on just about every issue you chime in on here.
F a g.
This post was edited on 11/7/24 at 9:23 am
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:22 am to Kjnstkmn
That was awesome. 
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:24 am to OceanMan
quote:
The question is whether the increase in 2020 was reasonable.
A similar (95% or so) turnout in 2024 would indicate that increase was reasonable.
quote:
But why should they be trusted in the first place?
If we can't trust the data then we can't have the discussion one way or another.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:25 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Ok throw Kamala in? She still loses and the senate candidate still wins.
Sure, but why didn't they add her in? Why only cheat in the Senate?
Adding Kamala is effectively a 0 resource effort
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:26 am to LegalEazyE
quote:
You do realize not nearly as many votes remain uncounted as would make up the huge deficit in numbers from the 2020 election.
It doesn't appear to be that big of a delta. Change is likely to be around 5%
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:29 am to LegalEazyE
And yet you didn't read my post above. Those states I pulled are actaul outstanding votes. Plus all the others that have 96-97% in.
Posted on 11/7/24 at 9:42 am to LegalEazyE
quote:
You do realize not nearly as many votes remain uncounted as would make up the huge deficit in numbers from the 2020 election.
Lost in the mix is the fact that the historically-outrageous number of votes Biden is alleged to have received in 2020 were JUST TO BEAT TRUMP by the narrowest of margins:
mArGiNs oF vIcToRy in 2020:
AZ - 10,457
GA - 11,779
WI - 20,682
NV - 33,596
PA - 80,855
MI - 154,188
That's less than 312k votes across 6 swing states, any 3 of the non-NV ones coming off of Biden's board would've resulted in a Trump win:
quote:
306
- 20 PA
- 16 GA
- 11 AZ
________
= 259
Posted on 11/7/24 at 10:01 am to Stexas
It certainly makes you wonder 
I think the establishment will look back and rue the day. It is going to set them back decades vs. 4 more years mired with an ineffective cabinet and a coalition of adversaries fighting like hell to maintain the status quo. There were also some things that happened with 4 years of biden that are going to make a huge difference in the second term.
Long term I think it will make his 2nd term way more impactful.
1. WVA vs. EPA happened in 2022. I am glad Trump and team had 2 years to digest the outcome and 4 years to use it to dismantle the bureaucratic machine
2. Seeing the weaponization of the 3 letter agencies under the previous administration paints a clear picture for most people that want the government less involved in their lives of what HAS to be done.
3. He has added much better allies (Musk, RFK, Gabbard, Paul) to help him take on the 4th branch of government.
4. Definitely gets a chance to pack the court with real conservatives with less pandering needed to get them confirmed
I think the establishment will look back and rue the day. It is going to set them back decades vs. 4 more years mired with an ineffective cabinet and a coalition of adversaries fighting like hell to maintain the status quo. There were also some things that happened with 4 years of biden that are going to make a huge difference in the second term.
Long term I think it will make his 2nd term way more impactful.
1. WVA vs. EPA happened in 2022. I am glad Trump and team had 2 years to digest the outcome and 4 years to use it to dismantle the bureaucratic machine
2. Seeing the weaponization of the 3 letter agencies under the previous administration paints a clear picture for most people that want the government less involved in their lives of what HAS to be done.
3. He has added much better allies (Musk, RFK, Gabbard, Paul) to help him take on the 4th branch of government.
4. Definitely gets a chance to pack the court with real conservatives with less pandering needed to get them confirmed
Posted on 11/7/24 at 10:04 am to OceanMan
quote:Well that would need to be asked both ways
The question is whether the increase in 2020 was reasonable. Obviously we can back into answers or reasoning for the vote count going down. But why should they be trusted in the first place?
Trump also had a 20% increase from 2016-2020
This post was edited on 11/7/24 at 10:05 am
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News