- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Philosophical Q: When 2 drunks have sex, why are rape charges filed …?
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:05 am
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:05 am
Against the male and not the female?
Set aside “blackout” situations. Just 2 drunks voluntarily copulating.
Both are non compos mentis. Each is playing with the naughty bits of the other. Why should one be a perpetrator and the other a victim, in the eyes of the criminal law?
Set aside “blackout” situations. Just 2 drunks voluntarily copulating.
Both are non compos mentis. Each is playing with the naughty bits of the other. Why should one be a perpetrator and the other a victim, in the eyes of the criminal law?
43
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:06 am to AggieHank86
Sounds personal....
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:06 am to AggieHank86
There shouldn't be but it's in the same category as some domestic violence cases.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:07 am to AggieHank86
You touch someone again Hank?
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:07 am to AggieHank86
It’s a very good question.
It’s a bad time to discuss it.
It’s a bad time to discuss it.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:07 am to AggieHank86
Because the legal system is biased against males.
Women are powerful and independent. Except when it's convenient, then they have no agency and are treated as though they are minors.
Women are powerful and independent. Except when it's convenient, then they have no agency and are treated as though they are minors.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:08 am to AggieHank86
Matriarchy.
Next question.
Next question.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:09 am to AggieHank86
Probably because most males dont have post coitus regret.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:09 am to Ernaye
quote:
Sounds personal....
This is what I thought too. Sounds a lot like those stories that begin with "I've got a friend who...."
I can't imagine what sick shite Hank gets up to. It's creepy to think about.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:09 am to AggieHank86
Society allows women to change their mind ad infinitum.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:09 am to The Maj
quote:
You touch someone again Hank?
I’m pretty sure it’s a hypothetical because he used one male and one female in this scenario .
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:09 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Matriarchy.
Next question.
Yes can you recommend a good lawyer for him?
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:11 am to AggieHank86
Seems like an ironclad defense.
Pretty sure it has something to do with men needing to be aroused and women just being present. How are you going to prove that she forcibly gave you an erection and penetrated herself on it?
It's ultimately your word against hers, and if she's got "evidence" then you're going down.
Pretty sure it has something to do with men needing to be aroused and women just being present. How are you going to prove that she forcibly gave you an erection and penetrated herself on it?
It's ultimately your word against hers, and if she's got "evidence" then you're going down.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:15 am to AggieHank86
I don't believe the law says that the man is automatically at fault does it? But wouldn't it typically be the person who initiates that would be at fault? That is usually the man.
This post was edited on 1/24/23 at 10:15 am
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:20 am to Ernaye
About to congratulate AggieHank for a thread everyone could agree with...
then you wrote the response of the day with:
then you wrote the response of the day with:
quote:
Sounds personal....
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:20 am to AggieHank86
Like Reparations, it is to make up for things that your male ancestors did decades ago.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:23 am to AggieHank86
Just another illogical double standard that shapes the moral order of the day. Err'body has got to be the victim nowadays.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:23 am to AggieHank86
It's the boner clause.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:28 am to Ernaye
quote:in a sense. The LSU situation got me to thinking about something that happened back when I was in high school.
Sounds personal....
The girl was a sophomore, and the guy was a senior. I was a junior. They were fricking like rabbits, and her parents filed charges. (This was long before Texas enacted its Romeo/Juliet statute).
The girl was from one of the “old families,“ and the boy was recent oil field trash. Her father had known my father since birth, so my father asked me what was really going on. I told him in no uncertain terms that she was fricking that boy for free weed, and that no one was forcing anyone into anything. Dad told his friend, but the family pressed the matter anyway. Small town politics.
The kid was convicted.
This post was edited on 1/24/23 at 1:48 pm
Posted on 1/24/23 at 10:31 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The kid was convicted.
He was sleeping with a 15 year old and giving her weed?
He should be convicted.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News