Started By
Message

re: Pfizer efficacy down to 42% while FDA standard for safe/effective/approval is 50%

Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:51 am to
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39689 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:51 am to
quote:

You mean the natural immunity that has the hospitals full of a majority non vaccinated? So that natural immunity?


Wait... What makes you think the non-immunized folks in the hospital have had COVID before?

Everyone's a fricking doctor all of the sudden.

Posted by jmon
Mandeville, LA
Member since Oct 2010
8464 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Everyone's a fricking doctor all of the sudden.

Pot meet fricking kettle, lol!
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22400 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:52 am to
quote:


You mean the natural immunity that has the hospitals full of a majority non vaccinated? So that natural immunity?



Did a majority of those folks have Covid already and were reinfected? Not sure I see your point.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36548 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 10:53 am to
quote:

This is a tad presumptuous, dont you think?



Not really.

quote:

Is it your belief that in 10,000 years of "pre-vaccine" human existence, we have never survived animal borne viral pandemics through natural immunity?



First, infectious diseases have limited population growth severely through all of human history. Sanitation and wastewater treatment did more to limit the spread of disease than anything else, as it curbed fecal-oral transmission. Effectively, herd immunity was only possible with extremely small, unconnected populations, but they also were extremely prone to new infections. Secondly, because of the size of human populations currently, and the interconnected nature of markets, it is incredibly difficult, if not impossible, to reach population equilibrium which smaller, orphaned populations could reach. Thirdly, certain viruses, especially RNA viruses, and certain bacteria, like Neisseria gonorrheae, developed extremely robust methods of avoiding detection by human immune response. Hepatitis C has evaded public health efforts because of its antigenic variation, and segmented RNA viruses like influenza are effectively impossible to develop long-term immunity at all.

There isn't evidence for any widespread human immunity for an infectious disease before vaccination. We could possibly eliminate certain diseases with antigenic stability with vaccination efforts, but the time for that has probably passed us by.
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 11:04 am
Posted by kennypowers
AR
Member since Mar 2009
511 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 11:02 am to
quote:

I understand that, however, if the vaccine worked at all, you wouldn't see a corresponding spike in cases.



Just so we're all clear. You're now claiming that the vaccines don't work at all? Jesus my guy...
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63494 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 11:08 am to
quote:

As you can see above, Moderna was 91% effective at preventing hospitalization and Pfizer was at 85%.


The cumulative rate of hospitalizations for people under 40 is 700 per 100,000 confirmed cases in that age group. That's all in since the beginning. So simply being young and healthy has a hospital prevention success rate of 99.3%.

So do we All still need this, or is the 80+% vax rate for the elderly a pretty good figure at this point?
Posted by El Magnifico
La casa de tu mamá
Member since Jan 2014
7017 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 11:09 am to
Those corrupt fricks will approve regardless
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 11:12 am to
quote:

So simply being young and healthy has a hospital prevention success rate of 99.3%.



big pharma doesn't want you to know that tho
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36548 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 11:17 am to
quote:

So simply being young and healthy has a hospital prevention success rate of 99.3%.



Which represents a minority of people, as upwards of 50% of Americans are obese, and we have a relatively old population, with a median age in the 40s. The 99% number was meaningless for most of the American population.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63494 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 11:25 am to
I meant to edit that. That figure is irrespective of health status. That is simply the rate of hospitalization for all covid positive people under 40.

Either way, that is irrelevant. Nobody should be making the decision about the need for a vax except the person and their doctor. Are we supposed to have federal monitors in the room with patient and doctor to review test results and stats and if they exceed a certain threshold, lock them in until they take the shot? Are the "everyone get vaccinated!" loons running quick diagnostics out in the wild to determine if they have the right to shout at someone who isn't vaccinated? I really don't understand the lunacy of this mandate talk. I honestly don't understand the continued frantic push altogether given who we know is already highly vaccinated.

Eta
And just to close the loop on your analysis of the significance of that 99%, over 50% of the population in the US is under 40 (as of 2019.)
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 11:36 am
Posted by weptiger
Georgia
Member since Feb 2007
10403 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 11:27 am to
So, if I get the vaccine, I am not immune from Covid, but it can potentially lessen the effects of Covid upon me. Once I have recovered from Covid, the vaccine alone won’t prevent me from getting Covid again. I can still experience a breakthrough and even die as a vaccinated person.

If I don’t get the vaccine, contract Covid and ultimately recover without death, I could get Covid again and repeat the same cycle at a later date, worse impact and die.

In either scenario, I can be symptomatic and contagious, the only difference being that with the vaccine my case of Covid may be less severe.

All of this for a virus that there is a 99% survival rate in the aggregate. Seriously, Is that right or is my understanding wrong?

Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 11:30 am to
yes but we are still learning about possible side effects of the vaccine

that's partly why moderna stock is getting rekt today
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 11:31 am
Posted by jmon
Mandeville, LA
Member since Oct 2010
8464 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 11:35 am to
quote:

hospitals full of a majority non vaccinated


comprendo?
Posted by The Levee
Bat Country
Member since Feb 2006
10821 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Case counts are 1/2 those of the January peak. ICU admissions are 1/20th what they were.


Get those facts out of here!
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 11:56 am to
btw possible side effects

skin rash, kidney inflammation and spilling more than normal protein in urine.

they asked the makers to study any relation between them.

if there was actual concerns, they would stop the shots.

if we do stop the shots grab your popcorn
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53039 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 11:59 am to
quote:


comprendo?


Actually no. Apparently you no comprendo. You are arguing that all non-vaccinated in the hospital had covid before. I'm stating, you're full of shite and you have no data to support. I'm also arguing that there are a shite load of people walking around that have had Covid before, but aren't in the hospital now. Try again, short bus.
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
43124 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 12:03 pm to
To be fair, that paragraph is specific to the Delta variant.

That still isn't good, but it isn't about the over all efficacy.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53039 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 12:04 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 12:05 pm
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89775 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

To be fair, that paragraph is specific to the Delta variant.



Which variant (if the CDC is to be believed) is spreading through the nation and the vast, unwashed, uneducated, unvaccinated masses in the Southeast?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39689 posts
Posted on 8/11/21 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

There isn't evidence for any widespread human immunity for an infectious diseade before vaccination.


What do you mean? There are TONS examples of historical pandemics where massive death tolls were observed and people eventually developed sufficient immunity combined with weakening strains to ostensibly end the pandemic. Roman history alone is filled with these cases, generally viruses brought back by soldiers from their foreign conquests. Archeologists in China have uncovered many mass graves from pandemics, yet the Chinese in these areas endured for centuries. We dont yet know the full science behind these early pandemics, but to assume that in 10,000 years of humanity, none were animal borne RNA viruses that were overcome by human adaptation... or that they are ALL still in existence today because there were no vaccines is super presumptuous.

We also know that these viruses dont remain static, and specifically in the case of COVID-19, we arent having success keeping up with mutations via vaccinations.



first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram