- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Parents Of Uvalde Shooting Victim Start Legal Action Against Gun Manufacturer
Posted on 6/4/22 at 2:55 pm to loogaroo
Posted on 6/4/22 at 2:55 pm to loogaroo
quote:No he didn't.
Josh Koskoff, who previously obtained a $73 million settlement to nine families of victims in the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting
The suit was for $73 million. Settlement was reached out-of-court with an insurance firm for an undisclosed sum. Definitely NOT $73 million.
2
Posted on 6/4/22 at 2:56 pm to loogaroo
All legal firearm sales are preserved except personal ones.
I don’t think that applies in this case.
I don’t think that applies in this case.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 2:56 pm to loogaroo
Parents looking to get rich off the backs of their dead kids. Sad.
Although you’re of course grieving, Daniel Defense didn’t kill your kids.
Although you’re of course grieving, Daniel Defense didn’t kill your kids.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 2:59 pm to idlewatcher
That’s like suing the knife manufacturer for a stabbing death.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:00 pm to loogaroo
What's the angle? The kid was of legal age and bought the firearm legally. What can the manufacturer be held liable for?
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:00 pm to loogaroo
Imagine the excitement all those parasitic lawyers felt upon learning of this incident.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:01 pm to llfshoals
quote:
Tragic bass fishing accident?
Fishing partner took a spill and opened the throttle wide open. Lost it all.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:03 pm to Tigerholic
quote:
That’s like suing the knife manufacturer for a stabbing death.
They're working towards that.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:10 pm to loogaroo
I guess I don't understand. I initially thought that one could only sue manufacturers if the product they manufactured was defective and caused injuries or death.
In terms of fricked up lawsuits...
Wouldn't the gov be at fault before the gun manufacturer is? Gov allowed that guy to pass the background check and get the guns.
In terms of fricked up lawsuits...
Wouldn't the gov be at fault before the gun manufacturer is? Gov allowed that guy to pass the background check and get the guns.
This post was edited on 6/4/22 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:11 pm to FlyingTiger1955
quote:
The Democrat lawyers will sue the manufacturers out of business and ammunition will be taxed so heavily no one can afford it.
Texas is an unlimited tort state I believe...
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:12 pm to Lieutenant Dan
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:15 pm to loogaroo
quote:
This seems rather quick...
Hopefully a judge properly cites the PLCAA and dismisses this lawsuit just as quickly.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:21 pm to andyv95
quote:
Why the fricking gun manufacturers??????
Maybe because the shooter was only 17 when he ordered the gun from DD would be my guess. DD is in GA. The shooter bought the gun at a dealership in Texas the day after his 18th birthday. I've been saying this since the second day of the shooting when an article came out saying he ordered the gun online from DD.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:24 pm to Homesick Tiger
He was legal when he bought it. The manufacturer did nothing wrong.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:26 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
Maybe because the shooter was only 17 when he ordered the gun from DD would be my guess.
First I’ve heard of this. But even assuming that it’s true, the transfer was not completed until after his 18th birthday, and after the NICS check was completed, so seems irrelevant to their “case.”
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:29 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
This is how they'll take away guns.
Yep.
Pull the liability immunity and kill the ability to get insurance.
U.S. gun makers out of business.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:31 pm to BamaFan89
quote:
But even assuming that it’s true, the transfer was not completed until after his 18th birthday,
I get that but are you saying it's okay for your 17 year-old son to order a gun online and wait until he is 18 to actual pay for it at a dealership? I have not read anything about the legality of that.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:32 pm to TrueTiger
A lot of these fire-arm manufacturers provide tools for the US military and law enforcement.
Great we will just be forced to buy Spanish weapons and those from other countries.
1914 all over again.
Great we will just be forced to buy Spanish weapons and those from other countries.
1914 all over again.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:34 pm to loogaroo
Worked property, did it?
Case dismissed.
Now, about those “ vaccines “ which failed to protect & stop the spread of a certain Wuhan originated virus…
Case dismissed.
Now, about those “ vaccines “ which failed to protect & stop the spread of a certain Wuhan originated virus…
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:36 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
I get that but are you saying it's okay for your 17 year-old son to order a gun online and wait until he is 18 to actual pay for it at a dealership?
Again, if the actual transfer of the weapon doesn’t occur until after the legal age already established under federal law, what’s the issue here?
17 year olds can enlist in the military, with parental consent, and they’re somehow magically more responsible when they have tax payer guns in their hands?
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News