Started By
Message

re: Pam Bondi announced that the Epstein files will be redacted

Posted on 3/7/25 at 7:38 am to
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
21416 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 7:38 am to
quote:

Why do the Epstein files need to be redacted for national security?


Because Epstein was first and foremost an Intelligence agent who used the young girls to gain leverage on rich, powerful, influential people and politicians. Whether it was Israel, US, or both, who knows. I think it's more about protecting/hiding this aspect more than protecting certain names, but both things can be true at the same time.
I'm not defending Epstein nor Bondi, I'm just stating the obvious.
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
11494 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 7:39 am to
quote:

Do you seriously believe she is doing this on her own accord?



It's important that GEOTUS has never failed but has only been failed to some people writing their own narrative of reality.
Posted by Hognutz
Member since Sep 2018
2607 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 7:41 am to
Stop moving the goalposts, Pam. We want the m'fers torn down.
Posted by RelicBatches86
Florida
Member since Nov 2024
1043 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 7:42 am to
the Deep State is intercepting Trump's phone calls.

he's been unable to reach her.
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
19234 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the Epstein files will be redacted due to national security concerns.

Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
175861 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 7:43 am to
Her being a Scientologist was a major red flag. People didn’t want to hear it.
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
41553 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 7:44 am to
quote:

Because Epstein was first and foremost an Intelligence agent who used the young girls to gain leverage on rich, powerful, influential people and politicians. Whether it was Israel, US, or both, who knows. I think it's more about protecting/hiding this aspect more than protecting certain names, but both things can be true at the same time. I'm not defending Epstein nor Bondi, I'm just stating the obvious.


This kind of thing has happened in the past with national governments and their intelligence running honey traps, and the scandal breaks to the public, and there is never any disclosure to this day. On the case of Belgium and Marc Dutroux they killed dozens of people for years to prevent testimony.

It’s not gonna happen guys

Kincora Boys Home

Marc Dutroux

At least none of the fools defending Bondi last week are showing their face in this thread. Imagine how embarrassing it must be to unironically have said “it’s just phase 1”
This post was edited on 3/7/25 at 7:46 am
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6342 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 7:56 am to
This means there are lots of leaders from around the world that have been honey trapped.
I think it would really be an issue with relations around the world if it came out that so many leaders in the US and around the world were involved in this. We all knew the full list wouldn't come out. It's too damaging to leaders, relations with other countries, and it removes any leverage on other leaders for whoever Epstein was working for.
Posted by Chorizo chang
Statesboro
Member since Feb 2022
783 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 7:58 am to
quote:

Another deepstate w


Which is super fricking disappointing from the administration that squeezes the word “transparency” multiple times in ever statement

This would have been an incredibly unifying event amongst the broader public and non MAGA voters, dismantling the multi tier justice system is something the bottom 98% will always rally behind
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
32461 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Isn’t her job to be in charge of the doj and represent the US in court?

They also advise the executive branch.


So it could be her advising, frick this implicates the US government. We can’t do this.




Do we think Trump read through the files or something? Because I very very very seriously doubt that.


Someone else did and is advising.


My point is if he wanted to, there is nothing stopping Trump for ordering his AG to release the unredacted files.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
92677 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 8:05 am to
quote:

I think Bondi is an idiot and Trump screwed up by hiring her.



Hope both get raked over the coals for this.

What a bust Don
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53607 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 8:10 am to
quote:

They need to be redacted because it's pretty clear Epstein was working for Mossad.


This.

It's the most likely explanation.
Posted by Harry Rex Vonner
Foggy Bottom Law School
Member since Nov 2013
47579 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Do you seriously believe she is doing this on her own accord?




So you hire people to run crying and burying their face in daddy's tummy?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 8:15 am to
quote:

What national security concerns?
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
63189 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 8:16 am to
Posted by Harry Rex Vonner
Foggy Bottom Law School
Member since Nov 2013
47579 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 8:17 am to
poor little Pam Bondi

she has a vagina, so she cannot be expected to do her job
Posted by goldennugget
NIL Ruined College Sports
Member since Jul 2013
26188 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 8:18 am to
There is no individual on the list powerful enough to put a stop to the files coming out.

In order for there to be a force great enough to keep this all under wraps, it has to be an entity, not an indivudal
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
63189 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 8:19 am to
quote:

Her being a Scientologist
wait, WHAT?
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
28381 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 8:20 am to
I laugh at people that actually think thst information was ever gonna hit the open market. Like I said it would be the Great reset. People in Washington either knew and turned a blind eye, or they were involved. The entire government would have to be replaced.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
21416 posts
Posted on 3/7/25 at 8:21 am to
quote:

On the case of Belgium and Marc Dutroux they killed dozens of people for years to prevent testimony


I've watched a couple videos about the Marc Dutroux case. I'm surprised we haven't seen deaths or "suicides" of people connected to the Epstein case, other than Epstein.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram