- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:07 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:07 pm to hawgfaninc
2
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:12 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:13 pm to AndyCBR
quote:
But the side that is winning the conflict doesn't have to agree to pre-conditions.
The issue is that the Iranians do likely believe they are winning, as winning to them means the survival of the regime. The leadership lost, the destruction of assets, and everything else is secondary to the survival of the regime. The intercession of Pakistan muddies the water, as Pakistan has signed a defense agreement with the KSA and is also historically been used by the US when their interests coincide. If Pakistan intervened to prevent a wider regional war which the Iranians likely would have sought had Trump gone through with his threat so as to prevent specific language in their defense pact with the KSA from triggering, it might be the case that how each side views this conflict is still far apart, and thus it is likely that these negotiations will not be fruitful at the moment.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:16 pm to rmnldr
quote:
Iran: Ceasefire in Lebanon, and release of Iranian blocked assets, must occur before talks
Trump will also guarantee that they will get 75 virgins instead of only 72 if they show themselves.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:17 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:18 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:18 pm to hawgfaninc
Holy crap, these whole "negotiations" are just a huge propaganda campaign by Iran. They can't end and the bombing can't resume soon enough for me.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:20 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:23 pm to hawgfaninc
Xi: Kim, did you see what America did to Iran?
Kim: Duh, why do you think I’m trying to improve relations with Donald.
Xi: I’m kind of sucking up a little myself. We need to discuss our relationship moving forward. You up for some Dim-sum and a chat?
Kim: Duh, why do you think I’m trying to improve relations with Donald.
Xi: I’m kind of sucking up a little myself. We need to discuss our relationship moving forward. You up for some Dim-sum and a chat?
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:27 pm to hawgfaninc
Is there not some alternative means to destroying mines and/or clearing an area?
I don't understand why some heavy bunker busting ordinance wouldn't create enough of a positive pressure shockwave and then cavitation to destroy mines underwater in a pretty large area? Similar to how depth charges destroy submarines and ships with the same explosion then cavitation
I don't understand why some heavy bunker busting ordinance wouldn't create enough of a positive pressure shockwave and then cavitation to destroy mines underwater in a pretty large area? Similar to how depth charges destroy submarines and ships with the same explosion then cavitation
This post was edited on 4/10/26 at 8:30 pm
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:29 pm to RazorBroncs
Locating the mines is the difficult part. Physically removing them can be challenging but isn’t the main challenge.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:34 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
Is there not some alternative means to destroying mines and/or clearing an area?
Part of the issue could be that with IRGC commands having such independence, they could not know where the mines are or that they did indeed lose tracking of their own mines, but I think there could be two other likely scenarios. First, suggesting that they 'lost' some mines could lay the groundwork for plausible deniability for future attacks against specifically GCC shipping. The second is that they want to outsource the cost of removing the mines to other parties, which is in effect the same as losing track of the mines.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:36 pm to rmnldr
If you find them, why not detonate them in place.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:37 pm to crazy4lsu
I’d also submit that the actual number of mines in the strait are probably minuscule.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:38 pm to crazy4lsu
Or maybe there are no mines. But fear of mines is slowing down the US navy and shipping companies from moving through the strait.
Maybe it’s simply a psyop.
Maybe it’s simply a psyop.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:39 pm to hawgfaninc
Losing outdated drones meant to be replaced in 1-2 years. The horror
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:40 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Not sure why people are shitting on rmnldr - he clearly said “don’t shoot the messenger”.
Doesn’t mean he believe the smut released from Iran or their sycophants.
Doesn’t mean he believe the smut released from Iran or their sycophants.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:41 pm to idlewatcher
I posted my reason feel free to read it.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:42 pm to hawgfaninc
I'm pro Trump but I'm not sure this person who presents themselves as a pre-teen, informing us about the war effort, lends the exercise much credibility...
Posted on 4/10/26 at 8:42 pm to TigerMan327
The whole point of a drone is to put it into perilous situations to gather information.
You don’t expect them all to come back, that’s why you send a drone and not a pilot to do that work.
You don’t expect them all to come back, that’s why you send a drone and not a pilot to do that work.
Page 676 of 834
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News