re: Official Pillow Guy Symposium: only flat-earthers remain excited

quote:

---

My guess is that they are on a schedule …. The final thing will be the recap and distribution of the packets to the public

---

I think this symposium has been very good. It's better than I thought it would be.

But, if you've watched, it's pretty clear that they've begun to separate from the data packets claim. "Better than pcaps" is something they said several times today.

The chances Lindell had what he said he had was always minuscule just because of the impossibility of getting it.

The question now is was Lindell duped or did he lie in an attempt to get an audience. I think it's the former but it is very fair to wonder if it is the latter. Dennis Montgomery being the source of the data was a large red flag that was very well known.

The leftists here will harp on this and pretend it means there was no election fraud. Some of the things discussed from a data and math perspective has been extremely good.

There is no doubt in my mind the election was stolen.

quote:

---

I say this as die hard MAGA conservative...That kind of shite has no appeal to me whatsoever. I realize there is a segment of Trumpverse that loves that blowhard nonsense, but it makes me cringe every time I hear it.

I heard ML say he expects all 50 states AGs to file a lawsuit to the Supreme court after the symposium. I can't take that level of hyperbole, thinking Leticia James and that woman AG from MI are going to be filing lawsuits to overturn the election in thr SC.

---

hey if a liberal ever does something this crazy, i'll be more than ready to make fun of them too. this kind of thing isn't moving us any closer to anything as a country.

I sometimes wonder if i was china/russia whoever and i wanted to frick with US elections. would i really need to change the vote at all? or could i do just enough and sow just enough disinformation to make people think it was messed with. certainly would be easier and accomplishes pretty much the same thing.

Hopefully, the AZ audit guys are watching this carefully and taking notes

When it's their time, they have to realize that in order to have a shot at being taken seriously, it has to be 100% professional. Give it the feeling of authentic work, and people will at least give it chance

But you can't run out Kelli Ward and the likes out there, and have them stumble or bumble around. It needs to be done correctly.

quote:

---

if i was china/russia whoever and i wanted to frick with US elections. would i really need to change the vote at all? or could i do just enough and sow just enough disinformation to make people think it was messed with.

---

So presuming a scenario wherein those foreign entities (and/or others on the domestic end) would have the capabilities to proactively affect the outcome of the an American election, you feel like they possibly would just say nah, we'll be sweet and just play around with Facebook stories instead?

And that's really the question: does there exist the capabilities to engage in proactive election fraud/interference on a scale that could actually affect the outcome by way of a cascade of events? If you believe there does exist those capabilities, I think it would be quite naive to presume that those who possess the capabilities would nicely forego utilizing those tools/weapons.

quote:

---

The chances Lindell had what he said he had was always minuscule just because of the impossibility of getting it.

The question now is was Lindell duped or did he lie in an attempt to get an audience.

---

If it's impossible for him to have gotten it, he didn't have it, and therefore lied about having it.

i'm excited to read about this though

quote:

---

We are going to do a mock election... we'll show you how the routers work ... we'll show packet captures in real time".I'm actually looking forward to this. Dominion machines can be networked, but DEF CON Voting Village didn't have networked machines to play with.22/ "I saw Hari Hursti is here" (and some criticism of Hari).He brings voting machines to the DEF CON hacking conference for hackers to play with, confirming they are easily hackable -- but they don't like him because he still rejects the idea that the 2020 election was hacked.23/ The evidence that I'm here to validate is showing that it was hacked -- not that it could've been hacked. I know it could've been hacked, by either side. I'm hoping to see the raw details showing it was indeed hacked or manipulated or fraud happened.24/ Yes, the schedule is for later today, to have breakout sessions, where (I think) I'll get to sit down and personally look at raw data -- and hopefully, get to post to the Internet for experts like Laura Chappell to see as well. (Source: LINK

---

that could produce some interesting results and help to put some context around those machine images they were showing.this type of exercise could be useful to actually increasing election securty

quote:

---

Hmm...mind telling us who you voted for?

---

Jo Jorgenson

quote:

---

No one is watching a 3 day presentation. BTW, we are 2 days into this and we have been shown zero proof of anything.

---

You start off by basically saying you aren’t watching it then follow right up with some bullshite claim you make because you haven’t been watching it! Typical mentally vapid liberal tool!

quote:

---

Pillow man pulled the bet, it’s all a scam (anyone with a brain knew this)

---

"But it's a 3 day event!!!"