- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Officer cell phone footage released
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:06 pm to the808bass
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:06 pm to the808bass
quote:Well it's kinda hard to examine evidence when I ask for it and ya'll scatter like roaches.
I have zero problem with people asking for evidence.
You simply discard any evidence that doesn’t agree with your viewpoint.
After that happens about three times on one topic, People stop believing that you’re actually asking for evidence.
I'll just take your work for it from now on. You seem like an honorable guy. I'll stop asking for proof from now on.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:07 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Thanks for proving my point.
Pigeon on a chess board.
Do you believe there are lizard people? Be honest.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:07 pm to TX Tiger
quote:what an absolute disgrace. just take the L
TX Tiger
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:07 pm to TX Tiger
Tx Tiger lying again.
Lyin Tiger.
Lyin Tiger.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:08 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Were they terrorists or not. It's a simple yes or no question. Stop dancing around and answer it.
J6ers didn't have weapons?
The only person that died at J-6 didn’t.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:08 pm to Jbird
quote:
You make a alcoholic Alaskan look sane
I hope he is ok. He rarely misses a day to shitpost and he has been absent almost a week. Anyone know him personally?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:08 pm to beaux duke
quote:
i've worked for 3 sheriff's offices for 16 years dingus
How much refuse did those departments produce daily? Did the deputies make a mess of the bathrooms?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:08 pm to BBONDS25
He wouldn’t answer me if he believes the government is trying to control his thoughts or if he’s ever been gang stalked.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:09 pm to beaux duke
quote:remember earlier when you said you were "confident" she didn't see the officer in front of her, then i posted several screen shots proving you wrong, and you never replied?
make up more insane fantasies.
are you still confident in that?
would you say that your repeated lie of "she didn't see him" is just an insane fantasy with no provable fact to back it up?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:09 pm to BBONDS25
Either a ban hammer or the idiot stroked out.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:10 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Were they terrorists or not.
Not according to Ivory, Bill, Matt.
According to him, you have to try to kidnap someone or assassinate them to be a terrorist
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:10 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
That turned into a BOGO.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:11 pm to Lsupimp
quote:So he was fearful of his life as she drove away. Yeah, that makes sense.
I think it's reasonable to assume that is what the officer believed when he fired the shots after she accelerated it.
quote:My apologies. I'm doing what I accuse this board of doing and that's lumping a few voices in with the rest.
What would make you think from MY comments that I'm perfectly ok with that?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:11 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
I'm acting defensively because an American citizen was murdered and you folks seem to be perfectly O.K. with that.
"It's amazing how much leftist discourse is just them pretending not to know things, thus making discourse impossible."
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:12 pm to TX Tiger
quote:i'm right here.
Well it's kinda hard to examine evidence when I ask for it and ya'll scatter like roaches.
what do you think about how panicked she is? feel free to watch the video from 0:39 to 0:41 and see for yourself, but if you're having trouble not being a lying queer, i'll repost these for you.
looking forward to your response.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:12 pm to Thirteen
quote:
If there is a person passed out in a car and the car is heading toward a police officer it would be wrong for the officer to shoot the person.
A passed-out person isn't controlling the direction of the car. They aren't choosing to be a danger to the police or innocent people. But police can pit the car if that car poses a danger to others, even though a pit maneuver could cause a wreck that kills the passed-out driver.
quote:
cops can't kill someone for punching the cop.
Cops can absolutely kill somebody for punching them. If an officer is alone and could be knocked unconscious, then the officer would be justified based on the threat of having their weapon stolen and being killed as a result. The same reason applies if a suspect steals a cop's taser, even though tasers are not lethal weapons.
quote:
I don't understand how anyone can watch that video, hear the lady, see her turn the wheel to the right, and then conclude it was her goal to kill him. Was she reckless? Yes for sure.
For one, when she initially hits the gas, the wheels are not turned; they are pointed directly at the cop, and if not for the tires spinning, she would have hit him harder. Second, he can't see the tire direction, so he doesn't know if she is going to run straight over him or turn to flee. And notice he only pulls his guy when the tires initially spin towards him, meaning he did not perceive her to be a threat until she drove towards him. So he wasn't just looking to shoot her; he only reacted to the threat of the car. It isn't whether it was her goal to kill him; it is whether he has reason to believe she could be trying to kill him, which he did.
A few weeks ago, I watched a video of a cop responding to a call at a hotel of some issue with people in a room. When the cop is about 30 yards from the room, three people walk out, with one holding an AK47. Guy with the AK sees the cop and points it at the cop, and the cop shoots, hitting the guy's friend. The three then run back into the room, and the cop runs to take cover.
In the end, the AK47 ended up being a BB gun. The cop was not at actual risk of being killed, but he perceived himself to be at risk and shot back in defense. Do we ask that he read the mind of the guy with the BB gun, or accept he had reason to believe he was in danger? Why did the guy point a useless weapon at a cop instead of dropping it? People being retarded doesn't put more onus on the cop to resist defending themself.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 3:12 pm to Thirteen
quote:
I think most people using reason and good faith can drawing a line for all the different situations.
For example, can we agree not ok to kill someone if they are threatening to break my pinky?
Is ok to kill someone to stop them from raping me?
Is it ok to kill someone for not providing a drivers license? Is it ok to kill someone passed out driving in a moving car? Is it ok to kill someone fleeing an arrest? It is ok to kill someone fleeing an arrest and whether or not i shoot them will make no difference to my own safety?
You're bobbing and weaving here. You've gone from "only if your own life is in grave jeopardy" to "well, it depends".
Reality is - I have no obligation to take any sort of physical abuse from someone, even if they don't intend to kill me. And it's not like the only people who die are those whose perpetrator intended to kill them.
Moreover, the idea that a cop can only shoot if his life is at risk ignores the real possibility that others become at risk if the a-hole isn't arrested.
Popular
Back to top


3






