Started By
Message

re: NYPost - Trump refuses to fly on his brand new Air Force One -

Posted on 7/8/26 at 5:46 pm to
Posted by RazorBroncs
Possesses the largest
Member since Sep 2013
16410 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

I would not trust any plane "donated" by a foreign regime.


You're naive, low-IQ, or both if you don't think every inch of that plane was gone over and electronics completely replaced

It's only the most important and highly protected aircraft in the world. But I'm sure they missed those knock-out gas canisters in the overhead compartments and the remote access capabilities buried in the computer systems
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17492 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 5:47 pm to
Okay - explain -

LINK
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38201 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

The new plane is pretty noticeable and the only 1 of its kind that I’m aware in the AF1 fleet. Probably just decided to come back on an older version so they can use decoys since there are multiple of the old AF1 fleet that looks the same. Just being cautious I would imagine.
dude it’s obviously the military and electronic capabilities of the purpose-built AF1 planes over this new loaner that’s just a commercial jet with some tech upgrades

It’s not the livery No one shooting down Air Force One is relying on visual identification


On that note, where the hell are the two replacements? Hasn’t Boeing been working on them for like 5 years


This post was edited on 7/8/26 at 5:49 pm
Posted by BurlesonCountyAg
Member since Jan 2014
5231 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 5:49 pm to
Posted by RazorBroncs
Possesses the largest
Member since Sep 2013
16410 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 5:50 pm to

It's literally been explained to you multiple times in this thread.

Even in a very long post by... me?

You really are a shite-tier poster. I've spent enough of my time trying to lead a retarded horse to water
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38201 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

It's literally been explained to you multiple times in this thread

The reasons given are the exact reason why everyone mocks the idea of accepting a repainted commercial jet anyway.

It’s not functional for it’s only function
Posted by RollingwiththeTide
Member since Oct 2020
7075 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 5:52 pm to
They do have manpad systems. They basically have the Chinese version of a Stinger missile. That’s what downed a few planes and choppers. I think the F15 that lead to the big rescue mission for the pilot was taken down with a Chinese version of a stinger missile.
Posted by RollingwiththeTide
Member since Oct 2020
7075 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 5:55 pm to
You can if you hit it not long after takeoff. Of coarse AF1 has built in stuff to make it safer. I was just pointing out the most obvious point and letting it go at that.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
24543 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 5:55 pm to
BREAKING NEWS!!!!!

EUROCAT'S VAGINA HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE INFECTED WITH A UNBEKNOWNST BACTERIAL INFECTION WHICH CAUSES A PERSON TO BECOME DELUSIONAL AND SEEMINGLY LOST IN A TDS FOG!
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63498 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

I would not trust any plane "donated" by a foreign regime.


Did you think that is what was going to happen.

The plane would be donated and then the US government would simply trust it?


Posted by crewdepoo
Hogwarts
Member since Jan 2015
11083 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

Can’t believe it’s even a story
the president getting a gift jet isn't a story?
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38201 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

You can if you hit it not long after takeoff

If Air Force one is attacked on takeoff from an international airport and joint Turkish Air Force base, Iran isn’t going to be the country im suspicious of.

quote:

was just pointing out the most obvious point and letting it go at that.

I was just point out how hilariously silly that was.
Posted by Mushroom1968
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2023
6684 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

the president getting a gift jet isn't a story?



This thread isn't about the gift of a plane. That's old news
Posted by B747Tiger
Member since Jul 2026
360 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

If Air Force one is attacked on takeoff from an international airport and joint Turkish Air Force base, Iran isn’t going to be the country im suspicious of.


I would. The Quds force has one of the longest reaches of any special operations outfit on the planet.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38201 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

would. The Quds force has one of the longest reaches of any special operations outfit on the planet.

Which is why if some guy with a manpad that he has for reasons on a roof outside Ankara with line of sight, it’s not going to be any sort of sophisticated special operations group. It’s going to be a deliberate security failure. It’s also Turkey, not Syria or Kandahar

This isn’t a Tom Clancy novel

If they’re using the old planes, it’s for its signals and electronics advantages that the loaner plane cannot possibly have.
This post was edited on 7/8/26 at 6:07 pm
Posted by B747Tiger
Member since Jul 2026
360 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

Which is why if some guy with a manpad that he has for reasons on a roof outside Ankara with line of sight, it’s not going to be any sort of sophisticated special operations ground. It’s going to be a deliberate security failure. It’s also Turkey, not Syria or Kandahar This isn’t a Tom Clancy novel


About a 1000% chance that Quds has people, or at least people loyal to them, in Turkey with access to MANPADS. Iran, most likely, just isn’t stupid enough to take the shot. But the Secret Service or the Air Force or whoever makes the call decided better safe than sorry and took the older AF1 with the defensive equipment.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38201 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

But the Secret Service or the Air Force or whoever makes the call decided better safe than sorry and took the older AF1 with the defensive equipment.

That was my only real point. I was just ‘ing at the guy who said it was because of the paint job.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
24543 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

I would not trust any plane "donated" by a foreign regime



Why? Do you not think that plane wasn't stripped down and inspected?
Every single screw, nut, and bolt?????
Meh, you probably don't. Your simple mind probably thinks they just slapped some USA stickers on it and called it good! Lol

Posted by B747Tiger
Member since Jul 2026
360 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

If they’re using the old planes, it’s for its signals and electronics advantages that the loaner plane cannot possibly have.


The “donated” plane likely has the same communications equipment that the older one does. That’s a fairly easy modification. Requiring for flares and other defensive measures or re-plumbing the fuel system to allow for aerial refueling is a much longer task, which is why the “new” AF1s from Boeing are so delayed.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38201 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

Why? Do you not think that plane wasn't stripped down and inspected? Every single screw, nut, and bolt????? Meh, you probably don't. Your simple mind probably thinks they just slapped some USA stickers on it and called it good! Lol

It very clearly didn’t get the full treatment given that the actual AF1 replacements are taking years and years to retrofit, and the POTUS is flying on the old ones because the loaner bird is just a repainted commercial plane with better comms.
This post was edited on 7/8/26 at 6:12 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram