- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/9/17 at 10:22 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
You often seem to be in a different reality than the rest of us when it comes to these things.
Alternative facts to support an Alternative reality.
Posted on 4/9/17 at 10:50 am to asurob1
quote:
Your Obama obsession continues I see. Let's see. What was Obama's approval ratings on his last day in office? What are Trump's current ones?
Look! Shiny objects over there---->
Posted on 4/9/17 at 10:50 am to SavageOrangeJug
I fixed it for you:
As for Obama he was an average POTUS
As for Obama he was an average POTUS
Posted on 4/9/17 at 10:55 am to Bullethead88
What happened in 1992? Something that started rolling in 1982. That was the year that a Democratic House and Republican Senate amended and renewed the Voting Rights Act, strengthening the requirements to craft majority-minority districts. Those new rules went into effect in the 1991 rounds of redistricting. In 1990, only 27 of 435 districts were majority black or Hispanic. In 1992, 51 districts become majority-minority. The result: Even though Bill Clinton won the presidency, the new districts and some scandal-based retirements gave Republicans a net gain of nine House seats.
In 2001, gerrymander gurus followed the same rules, but Republicans controlled more legislatures -- Michigan, Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, etc. In 2011, plus ca change. This is the less-discussed, more-disturbing aspect of the GOP's theoretical campaign to assign electors by congressional districts. Black voters, already packed into House districts that minimize their clout, would see their clout further reduced in presidential races.
LINK
In 2001, gerrymander gurus followed the same rules, but Republicans controlled more legislatures -- Michigan, Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, etc. In 2011, plus ca change. This is the less-discussed, more-disturbing aspect of the GOP's theoretical campaign to assign electors by congressional districts. Black voters, already packed into House districts that minimize their clout, would see their clout further reduced in presidential races.
LINK
Posted on 4/9/17 at 11:28 am to Lsupimp
quote:
Obama remained personally popular even as people acknowledged that he was wrecking everything he touched. That's a function of his race at this moment in American history. He was insulated from honest evaluation by Cultural progressivism.
Nailed it Pimp.
Posted on 4/9/17 at 11:43 am to PoundFoolish
quote:
Over half the country also wishes we were Mexico or the ME.
That's possibly the assinine thing I've read here. That's saying a lot.
Posted on 4/9/17 at 1:03 pm to Bullethead88
And how were they able to do that?
Dude, don't cry when Republicans use the tactics available to them.
Dude, don't cry when Republicans use the tactics available to them.
Posted on 4/9/17 at 1:51 pm to Jbird
OK. What do you think one is to conclude from that article in regard to my post?
Posted on 4/9/17 at 2:28 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Dude, don't cry when Republicans use the tactics available to them.
The Repubs didn't use the tactics that were available to them. They gerrymandered the districts far beyond what was constitutionally available to them. And then when the Dems sued to have the Repub re-districted districts declared unconstitutional, the Repub controlled Supreme Court changed the burden of proof so that even if the districts were in fact unconstitutionally drawn, it was next to impossible to meet the standard of proof required to force the districts to be re-drawn to meet constitutional standards.
But all that may be OK with you. Maybe, in your opinion, the one person -- one vote premise is just for saps.
Posted on 4/9/17 at 2:31 pm to Reubaltaich
quote:
Well, you finally came put from hiding after what, 6 months?
The illary lose must have hit you especially hard.
He was one of those clowns that assumed the election was in the bag
Posted on 4/9/17 at 3:00 pm to Bullethead88
quote:
And then when the Dems sued to have the Repub re-districted districts declared unconstitutional, the Repub controlled Supreme Court changed the burden of proof so that even if the districts were in fact unconstitutionally drawn, it was next to impossible to meet the standard of proof required to force the districts to be re-drawn to meet constitutional standards.
What in the world are you talking about here? The fact that the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional for states and other entities subject to Dept. of Justice review to be held to a standard based on 1972 numbers?
And urged Congress to update those numbers that were clearly outdated?
Posted on 4/9/17 at 7:28 pm to La Place Mike
quote:
quote: Obama remained personally popular even as people acknowledged that he was wrecking everything he touched. That's a function of his race at this moment in American history. He was insulated from honest evaluation by Cultural progressiveness.
quote: Nailed it Pimp.
Never has anything been more perfectly and factually stated on the PT.
Posted on 4/9/17 at 8:10 pm to TJGator1215
When he takes that off at night, at least it's not the first time he's grabbed some beaver.
This post was edited on 4/9/17 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 4/9/17 at 9:16 pm to Bullethead88
Damn dude, are the Democrats ever responsible for anything? That is some serious crying for a series of beat downs you are taking in elections. Pretty pathetic.
Popular
Back to top

0









