- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NOLA approves tax break for $100 million River District affordable housing development
Posted on 7/10/26 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 7/10/26 at 4:47 pm
NOLA
Something about how this deal is financed doesn't sit right with me. The money is almost entirely public: about $16.5 million in state funds from a federal low-income program, some unspecified city and Louisiana Housing Corporation money, a $6.5 million Convention Center loan, $4 million in publicly funded roads and sewers, and a 40-year property tax break. The land stays in public hands, with the developers just holding options to buy rather than actually owning it. By my read, this thing could be close to a 90% subsidy-driven project (if you include PILOT and tax-credit equity), with the developers risking very little of their own money. Right now only about $27 million of the $100 million is publicly itemized as coming from taxpayers.
And it doesn't pencil out on its own, which nobody really disputes. A unit that costs $455,000 and rents for $1,000 to $1,300 throws off maybe 3% before expenses, nowhere near enough to cover debt or pay back investors. The subsidies exist precisely to paper over that gap. So the question I keep coming back to isn't whether the numbers work on paper, they don't, and aren't meant to, it's whether this is actually a smart way to build affordable housing or just a pipeline for public money into private pockets.
The developer fee is what nags at me most. On LIHTC deals these run 10 to 15% of total cost, so somewhere around $10 to $15 million here, and it gets paid out of the tax-credit money, not the rent, whether or not the building ever succeeds. The tax break bothers me too, since the land is already tax-exempt, so what exactly are we exempting, and against what projected bill that nobody's shown us?
But the part that really bothers me is the setup where the Convention Center is the landowner, the lender, and the one paying for infrastructure, all for a developer that's been blowing deadlines since 2021, until a January restructuring conveniently wiped away the obligations it kept missing.
So taxpayers had better pray this thing doesn't financially crater mid-construction because that's the one scenario that Louisiana taxpayers will all end up eating the costs of this "affordable"
housing complex.
Something about how this deal is financed doesn't sit right with me. The money is almost entirely public: about $16.5 million in state funds from a federal low-income program, some unspecified city and Louisiana Housing Corporation money, a $6.5 million Convention Center loan, $4 million in publicly funded roads and sewers, and a 40-year property tax break. The land stays in public hands, with the developers just holding options to buy rather than actually owning it. By my read, this thing could be close to a 90% subsidy-driven project (if you include PILOT and tax-credit equity), with the developers risking very little of their own money. Right now only about $27 million of the $100 million is publicly itemized as coming from taxpayers.
And it doesn't pencil out on its own, which nobody really disputes. A unit that costs $455,000 and rents for $1,000 to $1,300 throws off maybe 3% before expenses, nowhere near enough to cover debt or pay back investors. The subsidies exist precisely to paper over that gap. So the question I keep coming back to isn't whether the numbers work on paper, they don't, and aren't meant to, it's whether this is actually a smart way to build affordable housing or just a pipeline for public money into private pockets.
The developer fee is what nags at me most. On LIHTC deals these run 10 to 15% of total cost, so somewhere around $10 to $15 million here, and it gets paid out of the tax-credit money, not the rent, whether or not the building ever succeeds. The tax break bothers me too, since the land is already tax-exempt, so what exactly are we exempting, and against what projected bill that nobody's shown us?
But the part that really bothers me is the setup where the Convention Center is the landowner, the lender, and the one paying for infrastructure, all for a developer that's been blowing deadlines since 2021, until a January restructuring conveniently wiped away the obligations it kept missing.
So taxpayers had better pray this thing doesn't financially crater mid-construction because that's the one scenario that Louisiana taxpayers will all end up eating the costs of this "affordable"
quote:
A rendering of The Rivana Aparments in the River District, a view from the corner of Euterpe Street and Convention Center Boulevard. The developer consortium is looking for the final piece of $130 million in financing to build 220 affordable units. The site plan for The Rivana Apartments in the River District, the first phase of residential planned for the huge public-private development on land owned by the Ernest N. Morial Convention Center. The complex will have 220 units, of which 165 will be set aside for lower-income renters.
City Council member Lesli Harris, whose District B includes the proposed $100 million Rivana project and the rest of the River District, said the vote was a win for the city's workers and the community overall.
The original Rivana development team — part of the larger RDNI group led by local real estate veteran Louis Lauricella — includes Brian Gibbs, Tara Hernandez, Michael Merideth, Shawn Barney, and Nicole Webre. The five partnered with Providence in February, giving the nonprofit 51% of the project.
Together, the partners have secured funding from public and private sources, including the Louisiana Housing Corporation, the City of New Orleans, and the Ernest N. Morial New Orleans Exhibition Hall Authority, which is providing $6.5 million toward the $100 million total development. The state awarded $16.5 million sourced from a federal program that supports low- and moderate-income individuals. $4 million from Convention Center for road/sewers plus open-ended infrastructure money in later stages that haven't been identified yet.
The densely built building will include 500-square-foot studio apartments along with one-bedroom units between 650 and 750 square feet and two-bedroom units topping out at around 1,000 square feet.
North said people who earn $15 an hour will qualify for one of the building's 60% AMI units and pay under $1,000 for rent, which she said is half the market rate for the area. She said workers who make $25 per hour will qualify for an 80% AMI unit and pay around $1,300 a month.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 4:51 pm to MrLSU
If ‘low income” is their target residents then that place will be shithole before the paint dries.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 4:52 pm to MrLSU
Sounds like an expensive ghetto in the making, with tax payers paying for the front and back end of the deal.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 4:55 pm to Jimbeaux
Shell Offshore is building right next to it……they have to love this proposal.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 6:55 pm to MrLSU
quote:
And it doesn't pencil out on its own,
Below market rents never pencil out without assistance
quote:
it's whether this is actually a smart way to build affordable housing or just a pipeline for public money into private pockets. The developer fee is what nags at me most. On LIHTC deals these run 10 to 15% of total cost, so somewhere around $10 to $15 million here, and it gets paid out of the tax-credit money, not the rent, whether or not the building ever succeeds.
Well, this is what happens when people believe that privatization is always the best option.
quote:
The tax break bothers me too, since the land is already tax-exempt, so what exactly are we exempting, and against what projected bill that nobody's shown us?
Govt owns the land. Private company owns the improvements which would be subject to property tax. That’s what the tax break is offsetting.
Look at the port. State / port NOLA owned the land. Companies owned the buildings and equipment. So they get tax breaks.
This is why all the promises of increased property tax revenue for the Louisiana International Terminal are absolute BS. The buildings and equipment will either get a tax break or be bought by the port. Either way, won’t be subject to property tax.
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 6:57 pm
Posted on 7/10/26 at 7:39 pm to MrLSU
Just what New Orleans needs; Another publicly financed housing project
Posted on 7/10/26 at 8:00 pm to OchoDedos
How is somebody making $15/hour going to afford rent of $1000 a month.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 8:02 pm to MrLSU
quote:
$130 million in financing to build 220 affordable units
Doesn't sound very affordable to me.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 8:17 pm to MrLSU
quote:
pipeline for public money into private pockets.
And we all see it. This project likely never comes complete.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 8:35 pm to BrianKellysbuyout
quote:
And we all see it. This project likely never comes complete.
Or it changes dramatically to benefit private investors. We saw this with the American Can apartments. And with the milk factory apartments.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 8:45 pm to MrLSU
quote:
The complex will have 220 units, of which 165 will be set aside for lower-income renters.
Image a government that wasn’t so obsessed with shooting itself in the foot in regards to its own revenue source (tax base for people who make and spend money).
Posted on 7/10/26 at 8:49 pm to MrLSU
Which 55 idiots are they expecting to pay full price to be surrounded by 165 apartments that are getting rental assistance?
Also, I see that that part of the plan calls for retail space on the ground floor. Are the retail spaces on the ground floor of The Saulet filled? If not, I doubt there is gonna be a ton of demand unless they're somehow cheaper, which I can't imagine given that it's new construction.
I fear this will be a huge mess.
Also, I see that that part of the plan calls for retail space on the ground floor. Are the retail spaces on the ground floor of The Saulet filled? If not, I doubt there is gonna be a ton of demand unless they're somehow cheaper, which I can't imagine given that it's new construction.
I fear this will be a huge mess.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 8:55 pm to imjustafatkid
In this case affordable is a fluid term open to interpretation. Just like the Saulet Apartments 20 years ago were to be " mixed income" It's almost entirely hipsters and has been almost from the start
Posted on 7/10/26 at 9:00 pm to dovehunter
quote:Easy. $1500 per month left over and handouts as well.
How is somebody making $15/hour going to afford rent of $1000 a month
Posted on 7/10/26 at 9:04 pm to MrLSU
TLDNR
but if this is spending money on housing that is given away , forget it, might as well burn the money…
but if this is spending money on housing that is given away , forget it, might as well burn the money…
Posted on 7/10/26 at 9:23 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
mixed income
Just a fancy, more palatable term for "affordable housing"
Posted on 7/10/26 at 10:06 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
"affordable housing"
Means nothing but fraud on the taxpayers. At a cost of $600k per unit, no one questions this bullshite? And who in the frick is buying the 55 units at a place that will house the dregs of society in the other 165 units? Get the frick outta here Nola
Popular
Back to top
10







