Started By
Message

re: NOAA : “among the eight warmest Februarys on record”

Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:06 pm to
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14172 posts
Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

Why didn't he get their attention by the quality of his research/writings instead of trying to fraudulently insinuate his way in.

Well he's got your attention now.
What an a-hole you are. This guy is a complete charlatan and liar and you're saying he's got my attention, like butter wouldn't melt in your mouth.

You're as big a charlatan and liar as he is.





This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 6:08 pm
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 3/20/19 at 8:25 pm to
quote:


Or (obstensibly neutral) presenters could choose colors according to centuries-old convention. They don’t make these kinds of choices accidentally


We agree
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14166 posts
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:08 pm to
Even if true...how long have we been recording February’s? 100 years? For a plant 4 billion years old this is meaningless.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46010 posts
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:20 pm to
I only care about the weather around the KC area...... it’s been a cold arse winter. Where’s my Global warming?
Posted by Old Money
Member since Sep 2012
36337 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 2:48 am to
Why does everyone here get so defensive over global warming?

If anyone wants to prove NASA wrong be my guest

LINK /

Obviously there are many liars out there looking to cash in on it which detracts from the cause.
This post was edited on 3/21/19 at 2:51 am
Posted by UFMatt
Gator Nation - Everywhere
Member since Oct 2010
11440 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 7:45 am to
I'm glad, we froze our asses off all winter long.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42561 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 7:56 am to
Just a glance at the first couple of graphs looks like they found that summertime in the Antarctic region was maybe not quite a freezing cold as it normally is.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89500 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 7:58 am to
quote:

If anyone wants to prove NASA wrong be my guest


They correct their data all the time. They almost universally correct down, minimizing warming. But the alarming headlines are all anyone remembers. And, then it makes it look like the warming continues, because they do the alarming reports the next year, rinse, repeat.

They've been peddling this shite for decades. Fewer people are buying it than they think.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52785 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 8:01 am to
quote:

NOAA : “among the eight warmest Februarys on record”



The same statisticians for NOAA must be the same statisticians for the NFL.

"This past February was was the 13th warmest hour from 1-3 pm on the 3rd Monday whilst having a quarter moon, with Jupiter out of alignment with Saturn"

When you have to keep saying "it's hotter, no it's colder, no it's hotter....why won't you believe me", then you've officially lost the narrative. It was a good run while it lasted Dems.
This post was edited on 3/21/19 at 8:02 am
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52785 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Sounds like the earths warming




Really? Is that what it sounds like to you?
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52785 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Calling bull shite on account of the 40 degree weather I woke up to in New Orleans this morning.
quote:
Posted by saints5021 online on 3/20/19
quote:
NOAA : “among the eight warmest Februarys on record”


Yeah, DUH... Don't you know it's 21 days passed February, so any temperature swings right now should be ignored. If frickin' february is warm, then it's global warming. If March is cold, shut your mouth until we can find a reason to blame it on climate change.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37483 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 8:05 am to
Red Pilled podcast that succinctly explains the issues with the methodology behind hockey stick graph

Everyone needs to be skeptical of these climate change people. Look at the data and analyze for yourself.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52785 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Everyone needs to be skeptical of these climate change people. Look at the data and analyze for yourself.



Especially when you consider the left's "consensus" is based on hand selected scientists.

"95% of the scientists agree...CONSENSUS"

when in actuality

"95% of the scientists that stuck around for the 2nd round of questioning agreed with our bullshite. You see, we asked a group of scientists, "will you take a survey that concludes man made global warming is real". After the non-believers left, we surveyed those agreeing with OUR statistics, and shockingly, 95% agreed. Yes, we know it's shameful we couldn't even get 100% since we told them how they would be voting, but we chalk that up to a few scientists had a late night, and had trouble bubbling in the scantron."
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23168 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 8:24 am to
You retorted an argument he didn't make.
Posted by Old Money
Member since Sep 2012
36337 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 12:43 pm to
Would you disagree with their claims that the earth is warming though? (Regardless of how much impact humans are having vs just a natural cycle)

Something interesting I read is for the Mars colonization, they want to warm the temp of the planet up by emitting a frick ton of CO2 over decades. Kind of wild.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89500 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Would you disagree with their claims that the earth is warming though?


I just don't have enough reliable data. I mean, we just had that low temp period in the 1940s - well, well after the industrial revolution.

When they talk about these "on record" alarmism bullshite, they're really only talking about 160 years. That's not even the blink of an eye, geologically speaking.

That's like getting alarmed when it warms up from 10:00 am to 3:30 pm on a sunny day. "OMG, we're going to burn to a crisp!" - then the sun goes down.

Frankly, that's how I view all the AGW alarmists.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:20 pm to
I'd simply like to point out again that if this was the 8th warmest Feb on record, that means 7 were warmer.

When were they?

Seems like relevant info to know
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Why does everyone here get so defensive over global warming?


Why does the CultOfGlobalWarming want to burn people at the stake for asking questions?
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53770 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Sounds like the earths warming


We can only hope
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123854 posts
Posted on 3/21/19 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

If anyone wants to prove NASA wrong be my guest
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is citing parking lot thermometers, buoy measurements, and freighter heat intake recordings along with ice core data, instead of its own satellite-based temperature datasets. In other words, NASA has decided to abandon Aeronautics and Space in its tasking.

Yet the Aeronautics and Space component still has orbiting satellites sending back loads of information. NASA determined it did not like the data it was garnering from its satellites though, so it assigned a team to fudge the datasets to more closely resemble freighter engine intake and asphalt parking lot temps. That sort of data manipulation should give anyone pause.

NASA breaking into its own satellite data, then fiddling with it to gain A 30% UPWARD ADJUSTMENT IN TEMPERATURE FINDINGS, speaks for itself.

So we are left to believe NASA is generating 30% errors in satellite findings? REALLY?

A 30% error is spectacularly horrible.

If we are to assume NASA was that sloppy in its work (I don't make that assumption btw), at that rate we can easily assume NASA is too incompetent as an organization to be trusted in the equation one way or another.
This post was edited on 3/21/19 at 3:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram