- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nike hit it's 52-week high today
Posted on 9/13/18 at 4:44 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 9/13/18 at 4:44 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:Same would go for the people who will now have more Nike products under their tree.
Regardless, customers turned off and changing brands with their next purchase were never going to show up before Christmas at the earliest.
Do you think there's a big difference in those numbers?
0
Posted on 9/13/18 at 4:45 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
Was Amazon as mature a company in as mature an industry in 2001 as Nike is currently?
No......but Apple was/is. Are you agreeing that just because a stock is at a 52-week high that it's automatically stupid investment?
Posted on 9/13/18 at 4:45 pm to bigman334
Nice troll, douche.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 4:48 pm to LSU82BILL
quote:
No......but Apple was/is.
Not really.
quote:
Are you agreeing that just because a stock is at a 52-week high that it's automatically stupid investment?
No, I'm just saying you used a poor example.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 4:49 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:Wel he said 3 weeks, and the Kap ad came out less than 2 weeks ago.
But it's less good than buying in when everyone else was selling.
quote:Sure. But for a stock that has grown 22% annually over the last five years with over 1% dividend yield on top of that, a missing the bottom of a little dip isn’t a big deal if one expects the returns to remain high, especially since it’s still somewhat undervalued compared to the trend line (plus no dividend recording dates occurred in the timeframe).
If you like the stock long term and are intending to buy it, buying at the dip was definitely better than buying today.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 4:49 pm to bigman334
Must’ve been that mayor rescinding his policy. Only reasonable explanation.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 4:53 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
missing the bottom of a little dip isn’t a big deal if one expects the returns to remain high,
exactly!!! it was one day!!! the trend line for Nike over the past year looks like a fricking ramp!!!
Posted on 9/13/18 at 4:55 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:And it will probably be a complete afterthought for most, and matter even less when it comes to buying (especially for someone else) in an elastic market with some brand inelasticity that Nike benefits from, especially since some of Nike’s signature brand don’t even have the logo or name (Jordan, Coverse and Chuck Taylors, etc.).
were never going to show up before Christmas at the earliest.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 4:55 pm to bigman334
quote:
the trend line for Nike over the past year looks like a fricking ramp!
It's good to know that past performance is definitely the best indicator of future performance.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 4:56 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Put another way, one who would understand the vast difference between Nike 2018 and Amazon 2001.
OK - So tell me what the difference between Nike 2018 and Amazon 2014 when you could buy shares for under $400 and their market cap was higher than Nike 2018.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 4:58 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:Other than company fundamentals and the market fundamentals, both of which favor Nike (high levels spending, increased discretionary spending, Under Armour struggling), past performance is about as strong of an indicator as there is for the public.
It's good to know that past performance is definitely the best indicator of future performance.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 5:01 pm to bigman334
A bunch idiots burned all of their Nike shite. A week went by and they realized they needed shoes, clothes, hats, etc. They then loaded up in the F150 and went to academy. Forgetting why they burnt all of their Nike shite in the first place, they purchased new shite from Nike. Nike wins twice because of these idiots.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 5:02 pm to LSU82BILL
quote:
Do you? Amazon was $5.97 a share in September 2001 and 52 weeks later it was $15.93. What kind of idiot would have bought Amazon at it's 52-week high of $15.93?
That’s a real apples to apples comparison to present day Nike, lol!
Posted on 9/13/18 at 5:03 pm to ProjectP2294
that statement tells me i shouldnt be going back and forth with you about stocks.. thats just dumb
Posted on 9/13/18 at 5:04 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:Probably. But then again "a complete afterthought" would equate to a very unsuccessful marketing play.
And it will probably be a complete afterthought for most
Posted on 9/13/18 at 5:05 pm to bigman334
quote:
thats just dumb
Posted on 9/13/18 at 5:11 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:Well how marketing many ads are intended to make the consumer remember the specifics, rather than the product or brand, especially beyond some target demo?
Probably. But then again "a complete afterthought" would equate to a very unsuccessful marketing play.
This post was edited on 9/13/18 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 9/13/18 at 5:12 pm to bigman334
Is Nike selling prison-flops?
Posted on 9/13/18 at 5:18 pm to bigman334
Liberals must not know Nike is on the DOW so when Nike goes up it makes Trump the business President look good.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 5:30 pm to LSU82BILL
quote:You mean aside from the fact Nike is a 50yr old retail-based shoe/sports-apparel company with multiple peer-level competitors, only a 38% share of the branded footware market, and heavy dependence on tenuous contracts for marketing?
OK - So tell me what the difference between Nike 2018 and Amazon 2014
You mean aside from the fact Amazon is near peerless in the sole-online merchandising category, has a huge growth-rate, continues to pressure brick-and-mortar business marketshare, is now competing in fields of grocery, video, etc., and whose owner could buy Nike 4-times over?
Aside from those details, maybe not much difference.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News