Started By
Message

re: Newsweek compares Karmelo to Rittenhouse; says the different outcome is due to race

Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:08 am to
Posted by Goforit
Member since Apr 2019
8850 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:08 am to
So, many blacks think that they have the right to brutally murder someone just because they are touched. If the scenario had been different and the person that committed the murder had been white and the victim black they would be demanding the death penalty for the white person.
Posted by SpqrTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
9735 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:15 am to
I love it when editors in chief and lead analysts of national news outlets are 20 years younger than me and try to explain anything to me… as though I can’t see with my own eyes what’s real and what’s not.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32528 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:19 am to
one retreated and only returned fire after being chased and hit with a skateboard running from a place he was welcomed.

one shanked a dude before he was touched after being asked to leave a place he wasn't welcome.

other than that, completely agree.
Posted by BHS78
Member since May 2017
3945 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:25 am to
You would have to Make Africa Great Once
Posted by Kirby59
Rocket City
Member since Nov 2016
1061 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:25 am to
I bet she lives in a predominantly white neighborhood
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
66920 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:33 am to
quote:

The article does not say the outcome was due to race.

quote:

The article is mainly about tribal differences


Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
9625 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:38 am to
quote:


You would have to Make Africa Great Once


They would want us to make it great again so they can live in the luxury they have been living in here with all their section 8 houseing/EBT/SNAP/medicaid provided.

Awhile back, there was a black woman who moved back there and was astounded that they didn't have the same or hardly any "snacks" to eat.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJRyvv3pAhG/
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
13436 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:40 am to
Getting exactly what they want.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
6274 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:42 am to
quote:

So, many blacks think that they have the right to brutally murder someone just because they are touched. If the scenario had been different and the person that committed the murder had been white and the victim black they would be demanding the death penalty for the white person

I agree

But what does that habe to do with the article in the OP?
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
6274 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:44 am to
quote:

L.A

Hey horse, I cannot make you drink even though you are the one who brought the water to this topic

Be better
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
66920 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:48 am to
quote:

Hey horse, I cannot make you drink even though you are the one who brought the water to this topic

Be better

Be less of a smug a-hole and I'll try to do better
Posted by Violent Hip Swivel
Member since Aug 2023
9616 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:52 am to
A "Newsweek editorial writer" says (posted) the different outcome is due to race.

Not Newsweek.

But the thread title worked for the attention and outrage you were seeking.
This post was edited on 6/11/26 at 11:55 am
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
6274 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Be less of a smug a-hole and I'll try to do better

If me calling you out on not reading the article you posted and then making false claims about the article is me being smug, maybe you should also read up on what smug means.

As far as the a-hole comment is concerned, only a true a-hole would lie like you did to draw up support against something that was never said.
This post was edited on 6/11/26 at 11:58 am
Posted by JiminyCricket
Member since Jun 2017
6673 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

So, many blacks think that they have the right to brutally murder someone just because they are touched. If the scenario had been different and the person that committed the murder had been white and the victim black they would be demanding the death penalty for the white person.


No matter how a given case goes, mental gymnastics from the black community would follow. If a black person is killed for let's say assaulting a police officer and trying to take his gun, they'd say that the officer woulda, coulda, shoulda shot him in the leg or tazed him or something of that nature and he murdered him because he wanted to "escalate."

In the metcalf case, they completely flip every bit of that line of thinking on it's head to claim KA had every right to kill after a shove.



TL/DR version? Black culture is going to stick up for their own and the details really don't matter.
This post was edited on 6/11/26 at 12:07 pm
Posted by how333
Member since Dec 2020
4497 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 12:12 pm to
Newsweek
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
81445 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 12:29 pm to
Loud music case was the closest one to this.

And it resulted in a conviction.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
71352 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 12:31 pm to
We’re in the 8th circle of hell boys. There’s a War coming soon
Posted by GeorgePaton
God's Country
Member since May 2017
5761 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 1:03 pm to
There's a name for this sort of differences in opinion - it's call Moral Relativism .

Moral Relativism occurs when a culture rejects Absolute Ojective Truth. Therefore in a Moral Relativist culture certain incidents of violence are not only accepted........but demanded. It is the ultimate denial of the Dignity of the Human Person. To murder someone with clear intent is to deny the dignity of that human person and his or her right to exist.

The black supporters of Kamelo Anthony reject the ruling of the so-called "all white jury" and argue that because black jurist were missing then that automatically nullifies the verdict. They simply ignore the fact that black candidates for the jury admitted (under oath) that if chosen for the jury they would vote to acquit Kamelo Anthony. They in effect admitted to a lack of impartiallity and unwillingness to render a verdict based on the facts of the case. It's that simple.

The big danger here - absent Absolute Ojective Truth a culture will always descend into chaos. The ultimate consequence of all this chaos - death.

IMO another contributing factor in the loss of Absolute Truth? I call it "Indoctrination by [a Steady Diet of] Illusion". For example: a corrupt Hollywood keeps pumping the poison of alternative values to the point you can't get people to agree on anything - especially the guilt of an admitted felon. Scary stuff actually.

In this disturbing murder case, it's almost like in addition to Kamelo Antony taunting Austin "Touch me again and see what happens" Kamelo was in effect saying, "convict me and see what happens". You cringe? Excuse me but in all this I do not see one shred of evidence that Kamelo Anthony expressed any remorse for his crime.

Hell is the absence of Ultimate Truth [God].

This post was edited on 6/11/26 at 1:22 pm
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
56270 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Cis Siberian Orchestra

Now THIS is funny!
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
17998 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 1:13 pm to


first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram