Newly mRNA boosted adults aged 40-74 are now TWICE as likely to be hospitalized for Covid

Getting boosted for these new variants is so unnecessary and you’re putting yourself at way higher a risk for bad stuff to happen from the complications from the vax itself and than the virus

One had to skip over the bulk of the report stating how useful the vaccines are to get to that graph...and you anti-vaxxers still misinterpret the data.

From the report:

quote:

---

Figure 15 shows that the highest hospitalization rates were in those aged 75 years and over for
every category of time since last vaccination. The reason for this is that this age group is more
likely to be hospitalized as they are a more vulnerable population. However, among this age
group the hospitalization rate was lowest in those whose last vaccination was 3 months or less
prior to admission (58.1 per 100,000).

---

So it helps old people

and

quote:

---

Younger age groups are less likely to have had the spring 2022 booster unless they were in a
clinically high-risk category eligible for vaccination. This may explain why the hospitalisation
rates were possibly slightly more elevated at a shorter interval since vaccination compared to
longer intervals in these age groups: the clinical risk factors that make younger adults eligible
for Spring 2022 vaccination may also make them more pre-disposed to hospital admissions
than the general age matched population

---

Only those with risk factors could get it. So this is probably driven by the fact the more recent boosters were given to those more likely to be hospitalized, than the vaccine caused hospitalization.


But at this point, you are going to believe whatever you believe regardless of data.

From your links...

quote:

---

Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease with the Omicron
variant is substantially lower than against the Delta variant, with rapid waning. However,
protection against hospitalisation remains high.

---

quote:

---

After 2 doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine, vaccine effectiveness against the
Omicron variant starts at 45 to 50% then drops to almost no effect from 25 weeks after the
second dose. With 2 doses of Pfizer or Moderna effectiveness dropped from around 65 to 70%
down to around 15% by 25 weeks after the second dose. Two to 4 weeks after a booster dose
of either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine following an AstraZeneca or Pfizer primary course,
effectiveness ranges from around 60 to 75%, dropping to almost no effect from 20+ weeks after
the booster. Vaccine effectiveness estimates for the booster dose are very similar, irrespective
of the primary course received (3). V

---

quote:

---

Amongst
those aged 65 years and older, protection against hospitalisation (defined as requiring a stay of
COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – week 35
9
2 or more days with severe respiratory disease) following Omicron infection was 82.3% after
one or more weeks after receiving an AstraZeneca booster compared to 90.9% among those
who received a Pfizer booster (6). Direct comparison of the AstraZeneca booster with the
mRNA vaccines is challenging using data from the UK, since those boosted with AstraZeneca
were more likely to be in risk groups and from previous studies in the UK, we know that VE is
lower in the clinical vulnerable populations (12). Nonetheless, these data provide reassuring
evidence for the use of AstraZeneca as a booster for protection against severe disease with
COVID-19.

---

Conclusion: The OP is either a bald-faced lie or a sign of shocking ignorance. The similarity of hospitalization outcomes between recently, and not recently, boosted people is due to the fact that the boosted cohort is much more at risk than the non-boosted. That's why they are getting boosted.

quote:

---

Conclusion: The OP is either a bald-faced lie or a sign of shocking ignorance. The similarity of hospitalization outcomes between recently, and not recently, boosted people is due to the fact that the boosted cohort is much more at risk than the non-boosted. That's why they are getting boosted.

---

The OP isn't lying or ignorant. But you seem to be ignorant of new science, or maybe you're lying? Because Covid changed science. What you just described re: the vaccines and the difference in outcomes based on certain health characteristics of the population is precisely the scam, I mean "science" that was played by the CDC, NIH, big pharma and big health to gin up all the Covid fear porn.

What's good for virus is good for the vaccine.

1. Get every booster just in case
2. Got original vaccine but when they started pushing boosters was like nope and stopped.
3. Pureblood. Waited to see the outcome of mass vaccinating millions, with an unproven vaccine, before getting any doses. Now will not get any no matter the data.

4. Got 1st round of Pfizer or Moderna and got so sick that you said fvck and skipped the 3-week follow up.

quote:

---

Figure 15 shows that the highest hospitalization rates were in those aged 75 years and over for
every category of time since last vaccination.

---

I guess im an antivaxxer. So Jim. Why did we have mandates for 5 years old and up? i mean its rt there in front of you. you posted it. So tell me why i needed to get vaccinated or vaccinate my children?

quote:

---

Now will not get any no matter the data

---

The data doesn't matter if it's the same virus. Nobody that's not a hopeless pussy and is reasonably healthy and under the age of 75 fears this virus.

At this point, almost EVERYONE has had some variation of Covid-19. The real question is what is the extent of natural immunity.

We also know that Omicron variant and above even though highly contagious is essentially a nothing burger to everyone even the elderly. What is the need to continue getting boosters that won’t stop infection for a virus that people aren’t being hospitalized any way??

From the study, para preceding the graph: