- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
New sworn depositions in support of Blasey Ford!
Posted on 9/26/18 at 7:55 am
Posted on 9/26/18 at 7:55 am
Lol, the lugenpresse and democrats are getting desperate
FOUR PEOPLE ARE NOW SPEAKING FOR DR FORD!
desperation, thy name is leftism
In before someone says this new nonsense helps her case against Kav
We have her husband and 3 people who have known her for 10 years or less
The only way evil wins is if good men do nothing
I'm so proud of Senate Republicans for FINALLY showing some backbone
Let's get this party started
new depositions in CNN link
FOUR PEOPLE ARE NOW SPEAKING FOR DR FORD!
desperation, thy name is leftism
In before someone says this new nonsense helps her case against Kav
We have her husband and 3 people who have known her for 10 years or less
The only way evil wins is if good men do nothing
I'm so proud of Senate Republicans for FINALLY showing some backbone
Let's get this party started
new depositions in CNN link
This post was edited on 9/26/18 at 7:56 am
22
Posted on 9/26/18 at 7:56 am to dcbl
Why would anyone (other than her husband I guess) support false accusations with zero factual basis?
This post was edited on 9/26/18 at 7:57 am
Posted on 9/26/18 at 7:56 am to dcbl
All of the depositions simply say that Ford told them about it at some point.
This is the definition of hearsay.
This is the definition of hearsay.
This post was edited on 9/26/18 at 8:03 am
Posted on 9/26/18 at 7:57 am to dcbl
quote:
proud of Senate Republicans when they FINALLY show some backbone
Posted on 9/26/18 at 7:57 am to dcbl
The guy with the supposed email naming Kav before the nomination is interesting
Posted on 9/26/18 at 7:57 am to dcbl
It's important to note that none of these Witnesses actually witnessed anything, but allegedly hearing about the incident much later from Miss Ford.... inadmissible in a court of law... an attempt to buttress
Posted on 9/26/18 at 7:58 am to dcbl
The “corroboration” isn’t even in the form of people who can independently verify the allegations. It’s from people who in the last few years recall Ford having mentioned something about this to them. Why couldn’t she point these people out immediately?
Posted on 9/26/18 at 7:58 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
definition of hearsay
Yep, Dems hear anything which could potentially be negative about Trump or anyone associated with Trump, and they say it to everyone as if it was the unvarnished truth.
This post was edited on 9/26/18 at 8:05 am
Posted on 9/26/18 at 7:58 am to goofball
quote:
Why would anyone (other than her husband I guess) support false accusations with zero factual basis?
Bc of the "feels"
Posted on 9/26/18 at 7:59 am to goofball
quote:
Why would anyone (other than her husband I guess) support false accusations with zero factual basis?
1)Because it scores them political points with the Dem establishment for favors at a later date.
2)Because it can't be proven false as she (Ford) is the only one that could call them out and claim they are lying.
This is a very low risk ploy for the people giving statements.
Posted on 9/26/18 at 8:00 am to dcbl
Posted on 9/26/18 at 8:00 am to NYNolaguy1
They give this airtime but ignore the people alleged to have been there denying it? Makes sense
Posted on 9/26/18 at 8:00 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:exactly
All of the depositions simply say that Ford told them about it at some point.
This is the definition of hearsay.
and it seems to demonstrate that the bag of tricks is empty
Posted on 9/26/18 at 8:01 am to dcbl
And nominee Kavanaugh said nothing happened before God and His universe. She is outnumbered and I believe him, where do I sign the form?
Posted on 9/26/18 at 8:03 am to dcbl
Either Ms. Ford or her husband is LYING.
According to Ms. Ford, she never told anyone about the alleged incident until the therapy session in 2012.
In his sworn statement, Mr. Ford says he was told about the alleged incident shortly after they were married.
So, who's lying? I'll give y'all a hint:
It's both of them.
According to Ms. Ford, she never told anyone about the alleged incident until the therapy session in 2012.
In his sworn statement, Mr. Ford says he was told about the alleged incident shortly after they were married.
So, who's lying? I'll give y'all a hint:
It's both of them.
This post was edited on 9/26/18 at 11:32 am
Posted on 9/26/18 at 8:04 am to dcbl
This is beyond absurd.
So if I tell 4 people a lie that makes the lie true?
It’s ridiculous.
So if I tell 4 people a lie that makes the lie true?
It’s ridiculous.
Posted on 9/26/18 at 8:04 am to goofball
quote:
Why would anyone (other than her husband I guess) support false accusations with zero factual basis?
They technically are not supporting it. They are just saying that they heard Ford say that this all happened. Which is complete nonsense. And the fact that this is reported at all much less championed as proof of anything tells me what I already feared. We are too far gone. This path has one end: war.
Posted on 9/26/18 at 8:04 am to dcbl
Obviously these statements can’t be used to show that the allegations are true. But they do have something to say about the credibility of the person making the allegations. Ford now has evidence she didn’t invent the allegation after the nomination.
Posted on 9/26/18 at 8:05 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
All of the depositions simply say that Ford told them about it at some point. This is the definition of hearsay.
Actually no.
The point of this is to refute the criticism that this was all made up just to derail this confirmation. If she told others about it years ago, at a time when there was no potential Supreme Court nomination, then the argument that she just made it up now is undermined. So the relevance is not whether the statement was true, just that the statement was made at a time when this nomination was not possibly known.
Posted on 9/26/18 at 8:05 am to dcbl
These are simple statements by family members and close friends and not formal “depositions” such as taken in a legal proceeding or government investigation.
They really corroborate nothing.
They really corroborate nothing.
This post was edited on 9/26/18 at 8:06 am
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News