Started By
Message

re: NATO Chief Rutte: "Europe cant defend itself without the USA"

Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:53 pm to
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
7178 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:53 pm to
America subsidizes the entire European way of life. Everything from cheap drugs to international commerce and defense are carried on the backs of American taxpayers.
This post was edited on 1/26/26 at 1:53 pm
Posted by ArcticTiger
North Pole
Member since Nov 2018
2855 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:53 pm to
This is 10,000% True. All you have to do is ask where NATO Countries get their weapons from?
Posted by SoDakHawk
South Dakota
Member since Jun 2014
10644 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:56 pm to
Russia wouldn't have been able to do any of that without lend/lease and the USA arming them. We supplied the machines and they supplied the men.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
35934 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 2:08 pm to
I disagree with him. We don't need each other. They need us. There's a difference
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8644 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

quote:
Meh comparable we did about 10% and the Russian road grader/meat grinder did 90%. The forces they committed on JUST the drive on Berlin were larger than the entire German force used in Barbarossa. The Russians were stacked in the infantry, artillery, armor category and not a terrible air support arm. We would have been hard pressed to beat them in a conventional war. Luckily we had the bomb.


Take away lend lease in the early war and Russia collapses.


More importantly, and all these Soviet-focused revisionists seem to forget this, the U.S. was leading the fight in another theater against the other mega Axis military where the Soviets were entirely absent. We had help from a fractured (but big) Chinese native force, various local insurgencies (like in Vietnam and the Philippines), the Australians, and remnants of the British military to help, but it was an American-led effort in the Indo-Pacific from December 1941 onward.
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
53725 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

We supplied the machines and they supplied the men.


Trucks and food and a huge amount of war materal obviously. Armor not much , they had good tanks and a lot of them. They did the fighting is what I was saying.
Posted by cornerstore
Member since Jul 2024
2088 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 2:22 pm to
No shite Mark
Posted by Beauw
Blanchard
Member since Sep 2007
4229 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 2:24 pm to
That’s great news! Give us our money back!
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76488 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

History says otherwise


Which century are you discussing?
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
38003 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

History says otherwise

I do know how to respond to this because it would appear that you're serious but there's no way this is anything but a hilarious troll.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24008 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

If that's true, that's on them. They've had 60 years to develop their militaries.


What if Russia decided to invade Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania simultaneously and massed troops on the Polish border. We sit on our hands? As Rutte said, keep on dreaming.
Posted by Tiger in Texas
Houston, Texas
Member since Sep 2004
22214 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

This is something Americans get completely wrong. We played a very important role in winning the war. To pretend that we could have done it without the soviets is a delusional idea at best.


Well, in that aspect I have to agree- Russia won WWII with an assist to U.S. troops and supplies. But I always wonder if Hitler wasn't foolish enough to declare war on the U.S., could Germany have eventually forced Russia into a stalemate with Russia ceding territory. Americans will never understand the true horror and brutality of the war on the Eastern Front...

Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
47137 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 3:50 pm to
We know.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
47137 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

History says otherwise


History?

*laughs in Mongolian *

Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
19485 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 3:52 pm to
Correct, the greatest mushroom stamps in history.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
80887 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 3:55 pm to
They can (or could in reasonably short order allowing time to build up).

They choose not to.
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
8489 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 4:58 pm to
Proven by WWI and WWII. If not for U.S. intervention Europe would all be speaking German.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
10674 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

This is something Americans get completely wrong. We played a very important role in winning the war. To pretend that we could have done it without the soviets is a delusional idea at best.


gotta ally with the commie regime who does not care about its own people to provide the bodies for the meatgrinder.

The old USSR and the current Democrat party have the same guiding principles.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram