Started By
Message

re: N Korea, Pakistan vs Iran

Posted on 6/18/25 at 9:50 am to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 9:50 am to
quote:



We have no idea who crossed our southern border during the previous four years.


So, bomb Iran?

Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
14569 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 9:51 am to
quote:

And you can use a single shot 22 without killing a bunch of people in short time.

You see how easy it is when you hit that slippery slope? This is the same argument Progs use to justify taking your black scary guns


My point was we aren't talking about the same thing, man. This is no safe way to actually use nuclear weapons. It's like comparing a Chihuahua to a Kodiak Brown Bear- and then some.

Only a brainwashed idiot believes the same thing about a rifle. I won't give them the time of day, with that crap.

But Iran is an outlaw state clearly hostile towards our best interests. Our survival and well being trumps their "right" to own nukes. Because there's just no sure way to isolate yourself from that threat.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170790 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Well maybe because Iran said, it’s going to wipe us all the map hello

If they're smart enough to develop a nuclear weapon they're smart enough to know that nuking the United States is the end of their country and likely the end of civilization
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 9:53 am to
quote:

This is no safe way to actually use nuclear weapons.


There absolutely is, and the "Long Peace" has proven it.

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135805 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Pakistan has been known to fund the taliban, isis, al qaeda etc
Pakistan has been known to fund the taliban, isis, al qaeda. Americans were "known to fund the" the IRA. The Taliban, Al Qaeda, Isis, and the IRA would each definitively exist without said funding. Without Iran's funding, Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis militant arm would not exist.

This post was edited on 6/18/25 at 10:39 am
Posted by Jay Quest
Once removed from Massachusetts
Member since Nov 2009
10690 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 9:56 am to
quote:


So, bomb Iran?


That is not the point I was making.

It has to do with their ability to cause extreme mishaps in this country. We don't know who is attending the Friday prayer service in the US, just waiting for the call from Tehran.
Posted by Stealth Matrix
29°59'55.98"N 90°05'21.85"W
Member since Aug 2019
11094 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 9:57 am to
quote:

So, help me understand why the USA needs to participate in making sure Iran does not have nuclear weapons and N Korea and Pakistan have them?

Because Iran has declared itself an outright enemy of Israel multiple times. Pakistan and North Korea also aren't Israeli friends, but neither designed their entire state to revolve around being anti-Israel.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 9:57 am to
quote:


It has to do with their ability to cause extreme mishaps in this country.


How many have they caused?

Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
41405 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Pakistan is like 97 percent islam extremists. So, yea they do


No its not

I have many of Pakistani friends, very welcoming country and people. Their bad actors do more harm to Pakistanis than anyone else.
Posted by Jay Quest
Once removed from Massachusetts
Member since Nov 2009
10690 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:02 am to
quote:

How many have they caused?


Japan never destroyed an American battleship until they did.

For four years, our southern border was unprotected. We gave the world carte blanche to invade us. Not so naive to think that the invitation was not accepted by some very bad actors.
Posted by NorCali
Member since Feb 2015
1596 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:02 am to
Pakistan is countered by India. North Korea is across the Pacific and can’t even launch a ship without sinking it.
Iran is in range of many US allies/assets with their rockets. It is geography
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:14 am to
quote:


Japan never destroyed an American battleship until they did.


Fear mongering
Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
14569 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:15 am to
quote:


There absolutely is, and the "Long Peace" has proven it.


But I said actually use- not possessing merely as a deterrent. They've only been used twice in war. And I along with many others probably owe our very existence to them shutting down Japan's will to go on, due to our fathers surviving the war. Strange to even consider things like that, but....

I guess it depends on one's level of trust towards the Iranian leadership- of which mine is non-existent.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:19 am to
quote:


But I said actually use- not possessing merely as a deterrent.


The deterrent is the primary use of nukes.

Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
6780 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:49 am to
quote:

harbored Osama Bin Laden

Iran did not like Bin Laden and detained a lot of Al Qaeda members. Iran is Shia Muslim and Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bin Ladin Sunni Muslim.

Hamas and Al Qaeda are different types of terrorist. They don’t always do an enemy of my enemy is a friend. Iraq and Iran had a 8 year war after the revolution in Iran. Iran and Pakistan are in conflict now.
This post was edited on 6/18/25 at 10:51 am
Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
14569 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

The deterrent is the primary use of nukes.



And now we arrive at the main question: Can IRAN be trusted to do that??

I wouldn't gamble my life on that no more than I'd throw a pistol outside for a home invader in the name of "fairness."

No thank ya.
Posted by gothamdawg
NYC
Member since Nov 2015
1330 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 1:30 pm to
quote:


I don’t believe Iran would nuke America…. The same way Pakistan’s and India don’t nuke eachother- sure they hate eachother but understand the reality of the consequences of that action


MAD is a real thing
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
23784 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:00 pm to
None of them, nor Israel, are in the non-proliferation treaty. So they truly kept their sovereignty and do not have to let inspectors in.

Pretty simple.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
6290 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Theyre in no position to carry this out in any fashion

But they would if they could.

Allowing them to have a nuke allows them to do more damage.

They have aided in the deaths of many Americans.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15098 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

You know why. Israel owns Washington DC


Is that why the treaty we made with the Houthis covered Israel too?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram