Started By
Message

re: My problem with the Trump wall: it's solving an imaginary problem

Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:11 pm to
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

I still want to know why 310K+ is okay and what he suggests we do about those that overstay. I and many posters have already given solutions to both problems.


P'man is 18 pages in.

Trust me when I tell you....he has zero intention of actually supporting his declarations. He hasn't avoided doing so for 18 pages for nuttin
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47511 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:11 pm to
Its not OK. But as God awful as the Obama economy was, you'd be justified to assume 300K to be a minimum. It is still too damn high.

Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173381 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:11 pm to
quote:


Trust me when I tell you....he has zero intention of actually supporting his declarations. He hasn't avoided doing so for 18 pages for nuttin


What exactly do you think I'm avoiding?
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34925 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:12 pm to
Powerman, hi.... neutral observer here, long time reader, first time poster:


Why is 300’000+ illegal immigrants a year considered ‘not a problem’?


I’ll hang up and read

This post was edited on 4/5/18 at 1:12 pm
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90315 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

What exactly do you think I'm avoiding?

1/10 Powerchoad.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Or perhaps you're overestimating the power of your arguments and the importance of your questions.




This is almost like stealin from a 1 year old at this point
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173381 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:12 pm to
quote:


Why is 300’000+ illegal immigrants a year considered ‘not a problem’?

How about we go with less of a problem than 1.6 million

Does that sound more reasonable to you?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

What exactly do you think I'm avoiding?

1. Why is 310K ok? Explain beyond quoting population.

2. What's driving the trend?

3. If you can't answer 2, how do you know the "trend" isn't merely a corollary to something else?

4. Absent knowing 2 or 3, do you think trends must continue?

5. If a trend stops and reverses course over the course of a year, how does one know if the new trend will continue or if the longer term trend will take back over?

6. Bonus Question. If, instead of the trend continuing, we simply leveled off at the current number, does that count as "problem solved"? If so, why?
I'm sure there are others you've ducked. But, we can start there.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90315 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Why is 300’000+ illegal immigrants a year considered ‘not a problem’?

How about we go with less of a problem than 1.6 million

Does that sound more reasonable to you?
fricking brilliant in it's stupidity.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97695 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

How about we go with less of a problem than 1.6 million



Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:13 pm to
So it’s still a problem then. Cool. Glad we agree.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

How about we go with less of a problem than 1.6 million Does that sound more reasonable to you?


So, a problem still..........thanks.
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34925 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:14 pm to
Well, according to you in the first post:

quote:

It's a problem that largely no longer exists.






So no.. now can you please just answer my question instead of asking me a question back?
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19519 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

It's the trend that is important. The numbers are already trending downward without a wall and have been doing so for over a decade


So if that logic is truly viable why don't left-wingers apply it when asking for more gun-control laws?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

How about we go with less of a problem than 1.6 million


quote:

an imaginary problem

19 fricking pages to get to this.
This post was edited on 4/5/18 at 1:16 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173381 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:16 pm to
quote:


1. Why is 310K ok? Explain beyond quoting population.


So looking at things on a % basis is meaningless?

quote:

2. What's driving the trend?

Already answered
quote:

3. If you can't answer 2, how do you know the "trend" isn't merely a corollary to something else?

4. Absent knowing 2 or 3, do you think trends must continue?

Already addressed

quote:

5. If a trend stops and reverses course over the course of a year, how does one know if the new trend will continue or if the longer term trend will take back over?

You would need to look further into the metrics that you believe correlate to the trends obviously

quote:

6. Bonus Question. If, instead of the trend continuing, we simply leveled off at the current number, does that count as "problem solved"? If so, why?
I'm sure there are others you've ducked. But, we can start there.

I suppose that depends on what you're willing to accept in terms of illegal immigration

If it stayed flat at 310K I would say that we don't have a major problem to worry about.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90315 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

If it stayed flat at 310K I would say that we don't have a major problem to worry about.
Imaginary.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

So looking at things on a % basis is meaningless?
Explain why you think it means there's no problem.

quote:

Already answered
False. You supplied "could" things. "Could" isn't permanent and therefore, "could" can reverse. Therefore, "but muh trend" fails.

quote:

Already addressed

Link

quote:

You would need to look further into the metrics that you believe correlate to the trends obviously
You're the one who made the declaration of fact man.

quote:

I suppose that depends on what you're willing to accept in terms of illegal immigration If it stayed flat at 310K I would say that we don't have a major problem to worry about.

See question 1
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173381 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

19 fricking pages to get to this.

The problem is an imaginary problem in that it is imagined to be a huge crisis when it is in fact not

Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

Jbird
quote:

Imaginary


It shifted from "imaginary" to not a "major" problem.

Me thinks dude folded.
Jump to page
Page First 17 18 19 20 21 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 19 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram