- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Moving Goal Posts on Ability to Be Fair and Impartial
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:36 pm
Conservatives have been told the 17 Angry Democrats on the Mueller probe cannot be looked at with suspicion just because they're Democrats. They are professionals who are capable of acting impartially when conducting investigations. Even if some of the investigators have sent thousands of texts stating their hatred for the subject of the investigation, we are not to suggest it skewed their judgment.
BUT, in the Left's eyes, if a nominee for SC Justice is a Republican...it's an automatic disqualifier. Interesting...so he cannot be impartial? Please tell me how that isn't hypocritical.
BUT, in the Left's eyes, if a nominee for SC Justice is a Republican...it's an automatic disqualifier. Interesting...so he cannot be impartial? Please tell me how that isn't hypocritical.
This post was edited on 9/5/18 at 12:38 pm
4
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:37 pm to PanhandleTigah
Every r nominee is going to murder the guys and overturn roe v wade.
It's hilarious at this point.
It's hilarious at this point.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:38 pm to PanhandleTigah
Nope We would like to see more than a single digit % of his documents. Why don't you tell us what he and Trump is trying to hide?
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:39 pm to PanhandleTigah
With Kavanaugh, they have no dirt other than the Executive Branch withholding documents.
With another nominee, there would just be some other faux outrage.
With another nominee, there would just be some other faux outrage.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:39 pm to Toddy
quote:
Why don't you tell us what he and Trump is trying to hide?
They are hiding the camps bitch... You are first...
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:39 pm to Toddy
You've been told, you free bleeder. The plans for your camps.
Get ready for shock therapy. Pence is coming for you.
Get ready for shock therapy. Pence is coming for you.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:39 pm to PanhandleTigah
Whatever the dems/media say that day is the truth to them. 
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:40 pm to Toddy
quote:
Why don't you tell us what he and Trump is trying to hide?
Why don;t you tell us why you need to see them? What are they going to tell you that his 300 decisions didn't?
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:41 pm to Toddy
quote:And we would like to see the unredacted FISA applications. What's your point?? What does the DOJ have to hide?
Nope We would like to see more than a single digit % of his documents. Why don't you tell us what he and Trump is trying to hide?
It's amazing how you only care about transparency on one side. And if they never planned on voting for this Trump nominee why do they even care??
Finally, as has been discussed before, more documentation has been provided on him than the five previous nominees combined.
So once again you're being intellectually dishonest. Color me shocked Shep!
This post was edited on 9/5/18 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:41 pm to Toddy
quote:
Nope We would like to see more than a single digit % of his documents. Why don't you tell us what he and Trump is trying to hide?
Trump has nothing to do with these documents...
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:42 pm to Toddy
quote:Hopefully everything you're afraid of.
Why don't you tell us what he and Trump is trying to hide?
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:43 pm to Toddy
Haven’t the documents already been confirmed to have been read? Also, they don’t vote on him for like 2-3 more weeks. That literally should be enough time for every person to read them.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:44 pm to Toddy
quote:
Nope We would like to see more than a single digit % of his documents. Why don't you tell us what he and Trump is trying to hide?
Jesus tapdancing Christ you are HIGHLY misinformed on this matter.
Go educate yourself somewhere other than a CNN headline and the 2 little bullet points at the beginning of the article right after it.
Here, I’ll organize the facts in bullet points to make it easier for you:
<> HE HAS GIVEN 5x MORE DOCUMENTS THAN THE LAST 5 JUSTICES COMBINED
<> THE ONLY DOCUMENTS THAT ARE BEING HELD ARE PRESEDENTIAL DOCUMENTS THAT HE ONLY SERVED TO PASS ALONG TO THE PRESIDENT AND HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH CREATING
This post was edited on 9/5/18 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:44 pm to CoachChappy
The whole muh documents is just laughable. Dems picked up on something they knew was covered under executive privilege and are making it out to be he is hiding all of his secrets decisions to kill gay folks and people of color. It is almost laughable at the steps the Dems take to try to silence anyone who doesn’t think exactly how they do. It is extremely clear who the real fascists are in this country.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:48 pm to Toddy
quote:
Nope We would like to see more than a single digit % of his documents
How many of Mueller's team's "documents" have you seen? What are they hiding?
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:51 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
Jesus tapdancing Christ you are HIGHLY misinformed on this matter.
Well I mean he's a proggy. That's kind of their thing.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:51 pm to CoachChappy
His decisions aren’t the same as his personal wrings, like academic opinions, amicus briefs or whatever.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:51 pm to Toddy
quote:
Nope We would like to see more than a single digit % of his documents. Why don't you tell us what he and Trump is trying to hide?
If only there was a repository of writings that would reflect his judicial philosophy and temperament as a judge...
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:52 pm to Toddy
quote:
We would like to see more than a single digit % of his documents.
Not gonna happen.
Republicans are too smart to fall for such an obvious stall tactic.
The vote is coming.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:53 pm to VOR
quote:Peter Strzok and Lisa Page had some personal writing and opinions...but according to your side it didn't affect their ability to apply fair practices to an investigation.
His decisions aren’t the same as his personal wrings, like academic opinions, amicus briefs or whatever.
So why should the judge's personal writings matter? Shouldn't those be separate?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News