- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Most powerful video presentation I have ever seen
Posted on 2/6/21 at 4:03 am to davyjones
Posted on 2/6/21 at 4:03 am to davyjones
quote:
the folks who were supervising the machines would have been in on it. In other words there would've been no one to sound any alarms.
like the ATORNEY GENERAL in michigan that said any lawyer that files suit claiming election fraud in this state will be disbarred?
those kind of people?
1
Posted on 2/6/21 at 4:13 am to ksayetiger
Any dissension from the narrative that this was a clean election is being quickly confronted and labeled “crazy conspiracy talk.” If nothing else, every American should be concerned with the censoring done by Twitter, Facebook, and other tech/media companies.
Posted on 2/6/21 at 5:24 am to BCBAMA
Is there any reason I should listen to the ‘My Pillow Guy’ as a source of election information? To me it seems like watching Mr Rogers narrate a sex documentary.
Posted on 2/6/21 at 5:27 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
Is there any reason I should listen to the ‘My Pillow Guy’ as a source of election information? To me it seems like watching Mr Rogers narrate a sex documentary.
no you shouldn't.
you should listen to all the experts he has on the video, however
Posted on 2/6/21 at 5:31 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
Is there any reason I should listen to the ‘My Pillow Guy’ as a source of election information? To me it seems like watching Mr Rogers narrate a sex documentary.
Lindell acts as nothing more than someone who funded alot of research and hosted the presentation. The scientists on the video do sound very credible and smart, but I am not an IT geek so some of it is a bit hard to understand.
Posted on 2/6/21 at 5:35 am to burger bearcat
quote:
but I am not an IT geek so some of it is a bit hard to understand.
I am far from IT genius
but I am a scientist. and what they say makes sense to me- it is really shocking to be honest.
one thing that really shocked me (well, not shocked, bit shocked they have evidence) is the Secretary of State of Massachusetts told twitter to remove Dr. Shiva's tweets about election fraud
WOW
Posted on 2/6/21 at 5:50 am to BeepNode
quote:Maybe he does. Maybe he doesn't. He should have access though. That is far more the point.
I'm sure that the My Pillow guy has access to those logs of various voting equipments
After all, the information you reference is not proprietary to a private company. Nor is it property of the government. It is ours. It is our information. Yet were/are denied access to it.
So while you critique informational validity and/or accuracy, do you see the actual problem?
quote:Yep. That is the way it's supposed to be. But given your statement, it's safe to say you were not privy to the DVS systems used in November.
The voting systems I've been privy to are air-gapped
DVS tabulator computers were not air gapped. We know that.
Voting machines themselves may have been air-gapped, however it is unclear if scanners were ... which of course would render isolation of the machine itself moot. Especially true as vote recording on DVS thumbdrives exceeded data capacity, and vote machine TDs had to be swapped out mid-election.
This post was edited on 2/6/21 at 7:57 am
Posted on 2/6/21 at 5:52 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Lindell acts as nothing more than someone who funded alot of research and hosted the presentation.
Ah. OK. I’ll give the last 30 mins a chance then.
Posted on 2/6/21 at 6:02 am to NC_Tigah
good points,
the 2020 election wasn't credible mainly due to the fact that is was not fully transparent
no one should be opposed to transparency, if we had that, we wouldn't be here and there would have been no January 6th event.
the 2020 election wasn't credible mainly due to the fact that is was not fully transparent
no one should be opposed to transparency, if we had that, we wouldn't be here and there would have been no January 6th event.
Posted on 2/6/21 at 6:15 am to CantBreak80
Nice to wake up and see a smart person posting here.
Posted on 2/6/21 at 6:17 am to Mr. Misanthrope
Where did the information come from?
Posted on 2/6/21 at 7:22 am to CantBreak80
quote:
But unless I missed it, it was never mentioned where the data presented came from.
Nope you didn’t miss it. It wasn’t there. The whole Dominion manual part was laughably stupid. Ethernet cables aren’t specific to internet traffic in case anyone is as lost as Mike on that.
quote:
Seems like all of that could easily be made up
It clearly was.
Fwiw I believe there was plenty of election irregularities and that the whole thing needs to be scrapped and remade. But this “evidence” and really most put out by Wood, Rudy, and those guys has been stupid. Also, claiming these were ‘miracles’ and showing they used the number 666 doesn’t validate your claims. Kinda like when bible verses were thrown around the Q stuff to make people feel like they were on the right track
Posted on 2/6/21 at 7:35 am to TrueTiger
quote:Correct. Credibility = Belief = Perception.
the 2020 election wasn't credible mainly due to the fact that is was not fully transparent
This is a situation where perception is definitely reality.
Ironically, a Democracy can survive fraudulent elections as long as the public does not perceive them as fraudulent. However a Democracy cannot long survive if its public loses confidence in electoral integrity, even if the process is righteous in reality.
Posted on 2/6/21 at 7:56 am to baybeefeetz
Posted on 2/6/21 at 8:38 am to burger bearcat
quote:
but I am not an IT geek so some of it is a bit hard to understand.
And as is noted in the film thus far(I am 21 mins in), this is intentional. It tamps down a lot of outrage due to the common man's(not a swipe at you) lack of impetus to figure out the details and dig deeper. You are here trying to understand and that is a lot more effort than most give.
As mentioned, I have made it through 21 mins. I have already had several bits of info tie in or confirm other bits of facts and info I already knew to be true. This is how I know they are dialed in here. A lot of items are being put together that we collectively already know to be true and not disputed. This video seems to be doing great at connecting them so far.
Posted on 2/6/21 at 8:47 am to BCBAMA
quote:
. Put your individual feelings about Trump aside
This...is impossible. We'll be farming on Mars before this happens.
Posted on 2/6/21 at 8:54 am to BCBAMA
If you watched that and game away impressed you have legitimate mental issues. It’s the same game that’s been pranced around outside of court since election night. A lot of nameless “experts” and supposed data that doesn’t prove anything and could be pulled from anywhere. If you believed in fraud before this just supports what you already think. If you are unbiased this doesn’t proved a shred of proof of anything.
Presentation alone this was a clown show.
Presentation alone this was a clown show.
Posted on 2/6/21 at 9:18 am to Chillini
quote:
If you watched . . . . . .
Like - that's just your opinion, man.
I'll wager that you have never had an original thought in your life.
The point is that anyone saying the equivalent of "debunked" has never seen - or is incapable of understanding the evidence brought forth. Perhaps the evidence is wrong - or has a simple explanation of why it is immaterial - but until someone actually looks AT the evidence rather than what the media and the accused SAY about the evidence then the issue is still alive and unresolved.
And if you try to point to the "60+ court cases, blah blah blah" you have to get past the fact that not ONE of them has actually looked at the merits of the lawsuit they dismissed our of "standing" or "insufficient to change outcome" or "laching (whatever the hell that is)
Nobody - you included - has ever looked at the evidence itself.
And even if you have, and determined that it is all fake, you have to be entirely unaware of the improbability of the occurrence.
Posted on 2/6/21 at 9:24 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
And if you try to point to the "60+ court cases, blah blah blah" you have to get past the fact that not ONE of them has actually looked at the merits of the lawsuit they dismissed our of "standing" or "insufficient to change outcome" or "laching (whatever the hell that is)
Factually incorrect. Here’s an article that breaks down many.
LINK
Posted on 2/6/21 at 9:26 am to BCBAMA
And a lot of the video was cut out to get it to fit 2 hours. Initially, it was going to be 3 hours.
During the show, he says this is only 1/1000th of his evidence. Domininion/Smartmatick is/are bluffing with their lawsuits.
The big numbers worked with some, but not Lindell, Sidney, Oltmann. How much do you want to bet Fox canned Dobbs last night because he wanted to cover the Lindell video?
During the show, he says this is only 1/1000th of his evidence. Domininion/Smartmatick is/are bluffing with their lawsuits.
The big numbers worked with some, but not Lindell, Sidney, Oltmann. How much do you want to bet Fox canned Dobbs last night because he wanted to cover the Lindell video?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News