Started By
Message

More people have watched the Tucker/Putin interview than the Super Bowl

Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:37 am
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57260 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:37 am
110 million on Twitter alone

Not counting Tuckercarlson.com and other sites/reuploads
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
19298 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:38 am to
quote:

110 million on Twitter alone


Impressions are not views.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
6450 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:39 am to
quote:

Impressions are not views.

Also there's no such thing as twitter
Posted by Nayab
Brandon's shithole
Member since Feb 2024
29 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:39 am to
110m people did not watch a 2 hour interview, impressions just means how many people came across the tweet and probably a huge chunk of that are straight bots
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57260 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:39 am to
quote:

Impressions are not views.


Actually impressions are impressions

Views are views

You know the difference right?
Posted by footswitch
New Market
Member since Apr 2015
3893 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:41 am to
I was impressed and embarrassed if you know what I mean
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
123952 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:43 am to
Say what you will about Putin, but the man is sharp and knowledgeable.


No wonder he doesn't respect the Pedo Potato
This post was edited on 2/9/24 at 8:44 am
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
6450 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Actually impressions are impressions

Views are views

You know the difference right?

Are you talking to yourself. You are the one that said more people "watched" the tucker/putin interview based on 110m impressions. 99% of those impressions are people that scrolled right past it and bots.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115515 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:43 am to
quote:

have watched


quote:

110 million


No
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
20276 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:44 am to
It was a very good interview btw.
Posted by dsides
Member since Jan 2013
5355 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Say what you will about Putin, but the man is sharp and knowledgeable.


To be fair Americans have had a steady diet of joetato and drumpf so the bar is low
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47589 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:48 am to
The super bowl isn't until Sunday, so this checks out
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115515 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:48 am to
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57260 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Are you talking to yourself. You are the one that said more people "watched" the tucker/putin interview based on 110m impressions. 99% of those impressions are people that scrolled right past it and bots.


I'm starting to think you are a bit slow.

110 million clearly refers to views as that is what is counted under the video.

So when I say “watched” I clearly mean “views”

And as someone who actually works with this type of stuff impressions are not views. They are two different things and counted independently.
This post was edited on 2/9/24 at 8:50 am
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68062 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:50 am to
I have purposefully withdrawn 90% from political news. Why is the interview controversial?
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57260 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Why is the interview controversial?


Because people are weak and scared of anything that goes against what they are programmed to believe.

Very few think freely enough to watch something and conclude what is true or not without letting pride get in the way.
Posted by PureBlood
The Motherland
Member since Oct 2021
3869 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:53 am to
Everyone in that lame arse UKR war thread needs to give it a listen. Will be educational at minimal in the parts of history that they obviously have no clue of.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68062 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:56 am to
But, specifically, what are they worried about? What did he say? I know he's going to give his propaganda and the other side has given theirs. Just wondering what specifically is different.
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
12056 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:57 am to
How many times do we have to explain how twitter works.



Impressions =\= views
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115515 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 8:57 am to
He didn’t say anything overly controversial.

It’s doing the interview at all that was “controversial”
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram