View in: Desktop
Copyright @2023 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South Carolina
Posted by Jjdoc



quote:
He is virtually the only Republican out there saying he can get a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia in 24 hours.
Where are the other people of any stature to even say this?
We’re all sitting here terrified of what’s going on over there, he’s the only one saying he can make this work.
Video in Link
quote:
He is virtually the only Republican out there saying he can get a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia in 24 hours.
And the Democrats would declare that Russian collusion got Trump elected just to get them out of a war they weren't winning.
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by idlewatcher
on 1/29/23 at 10:22 am to Jjdoc

I have no doubt he could. I mean “him n Vlad are bff” member?
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by HughsWorkPhone on 1/29/23 at 10:22 am to Jjdoc
Lockheed, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, and many others will now soon endorse him!
#HeGetsUs
#HeGetsUs
This post was edited on 1/29 at 10:23 am
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by TigahTeeth
on 1/29/23 at 10:24 am to Jjdoc

He legitimately could do it. 100%!
What that would actually entail probably only elites know, which is why Trump is constantly witch hunted.
What that would actually entail probably only elites know, which is why Trump is constantly witch hunted.
quote:
He is virtually the only Republican out there saying he can get a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia in 24 hours. Where are the other people of any stature to even say this?
Why aren’t others saying this too? Because it is an outright fantasy, a bold lie.
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by Lou the Jew from LSU
on 1/29/23 at 10:31 am to TBoy

Well, he’s been right about a lot of things. The left still can’t accept that he’s usually right.
Just because their myopic view can’t see it, doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened.
Just because their myopic view can’t see it, doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened.
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by HughsWorkPhone on 1/29/23 at 10:32 am to TBoy
quote:
Why aren’t others saying this too? Because it is an outright fantasy, a bold lie.
I think it’s because he would do what is fair, and a compromise. And the MIC and 3 letter agencies are not for that.
What did Russia want? Guarantee of a military alliance aimed at defeating Russia not being offered to a Russian border nation?
Kind of like the CIA would not have been a fan of Mexico entering the Warsaw pact. We saw what we did when Russia tried to build missile facilities in Cuba
If Putin was really the bad guy we make him out to be he wouldn’t accept, he just wants Ukraine right? We would see! And I don’t think it would fit the narrative
This post was edited on 1/29 at 10:34 am
quote:
Why aren’t others saying this too? Because it is an outright fantasy, a bold lie.
The US could force a deal overnight if we threatened to remove funding and arms from Ukraine while warning Russia that without a peace deal we would provide direct air and armor support to Ukraine.
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by TBoy
on 1/29/23 at 10:34 am to HughsWorkPhone


quote:
What did Russia want? Guarantee of a military alliance aimed at defeating Russia being offered to a Russian border nation?
Do you support Russia invading all actual NATO member states on its borders? Ukraine wasn’t even NATO.
TD Sponsor
TD Fan
USA
Member since 2001

USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor
to Everyone


Advertisement
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by tigahlovah
on 1/29/23 at 10:37 am to tide06

Russia has ZERO WORRY of this happening with Trump gone. This invasion would have never happened if the last election wasn't stolen.
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by thebigmuffaletta on 1/29/23 at 10:41 am to TBoy
quote:
Because it is an outright fantasy, a bold lie.
Remember when you groomers screamed that Blumph would start WW3 but he actually brokered numerous peace deals instead?
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by BengalOnTheBay on 1/29/23 at 10:42 am to TBoy
quote:
Why aren’t others saying this too? Because it is an outright fantasy, a bold lie.
I'm old enough to remember retards like you shitting on Trump's peace work in the Middle East and a few months later, diplomatic relations between Israel and some ME countries began for the first time in history...
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by HughsWorkPhone on 1/29/23 at 10:43 am to TBoy
quote:
Do you support Russia invading all actual NATO member states on its borders? Ukraine wasn’t even NATO.
I don’t support Russia invading anyone. The only people that did are the ones that floated offering nato membership to them. Because this was 100% the response it would invoke.
It’s not a right or wrong, just the reality. The US would do the exact same thing if similar done on our border.
Just for a second imagine Russia backing a Mexican coup in 2014 and installing a Russian puppet, then floating inviting them into military alliance with Russia and China literally aimed at thwarting the US. What would we do?
Politicians are playing chess and broadcasting a game of checkers, and you don’t even know what you are watching
This post was edited on 1/29 at 10:57 am
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by Jjdoc
on 1/29/23 at 10:50 am to HughsWorkPhone


The times that Russia took land was under Biden and Obama.
Trump blew up Russian troops for simply getting too close to our guys in the ME.
Trump blew up Russian troops for simply getting too close to our guys in the ME.
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by jimmy the leg
on 1/29/23 at 10:57 am to TBoy


Nothing ventured, nothing gained.
The reality is that the Dems and RINOs are warmongers. I have no doubt that they are on the take.
The irony is that tools like you and lakeboy would never lower yourselves to serve the country, but would have no issue sending off someone else’s sons or daughters to die.
Keep cheering on death and destruction though.
The reality is that the Dems and RINOs are warmongers. I have no doubt that they are on the take.
The irony is that tools like you and lakeboy would never lower yourselves to serve the country, but would have no issue sending off someone else’s sons or daughters to die.
Keep cheering on death and destruction though.
This post was edited on 1/29 at 11:33 am
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by jimmy the leg
on 1/29/23 at 10:59 am to thebigmuffaletta


quote:
Remember when you groomers screamed that Blumph would start WW3 but he actually brokered numerous peace deals instead?
No - they don’t, because OMB!!!
re: Michael Savage on President Trump’s “Electrifying” Speech in South CarolinaPosted by tarzana
on 1/29/23 at 11:06 am to TigahTeeth

quote:
He legitimately could do it
Whatever, he'll never get the chance. His support nationally is at about 25%-- just hard core MAGA crazies. He may get the GOP nomination; if that's the case he will lose in blowout fashion to Biden/ Harris who currently are overseeing a strengthening economy.
Popular
Back to top
