- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/15/14 at 12:53 pm to Ibleedblackandgold
This thread got quiet.
Posted on 8/15/14 at 12:53 pm to mmcgrath
You do know that the store that was robbed has been torched right?
This post was edited on 8/15/14 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 8/15/14 at 12:55 pm to C
quote:
The funny thing is recall the media making a big deal out of the police not questioning him yet.
If they didn't try to question him, that was a big deal.
quote:
My guess he was hiding and I bet he lawyered up and got immunity for the robbery prior to speaking with the police.
Pretty smart.
Posted on 8/15/14 at 12:56 pm to Five0
quote:I don't know that. I asked that earlier in this thread but was told it was a different store. However that was days later. That doesn't excuse the police from getting the video that same day the shooting occurred. Of course they likely never would have followed up if there wasn't a shooting.
You do know that the store that was robbed has been torched right?
Posted on 8/15/14 at 12:56 pm to kilo
quote:
This thread got quiet.
Foot n mouth disease.
This post was edited on 8/15/14 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 8/15/14 at 12:57 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
I don't know that. I asked that earlier in this thread but was told it was a different store. However that was days later. That doesn't excuse the police from getting the video that same day the shooting occurred. Of course they likely never would have followed up if there wasn't a shooting.
Who didnt expect this type of response in general to the news today? Its the old step down the ladder slowly from ones soapbox routine.
This post was edited on 8/15/14 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 8/15/14 at 12:58 pm to baybeefeetz
The robbery is secondary to the murder charge he could be looking at. Causing the death of another in the commission of a felony.
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:00 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Of course they likely never would have followed up if there wasn't a shooting.
Really? Based on what?
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:00 pm to Five0
quote:
You do know that the store that was robbed has been torched right?
is this true? Link?
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:00 pm to C
Let me find it.
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:02 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
It takes time to get surveillance footage especially when the entire area is getting overrun with violent looters.
I think they just got it on Wednesday night, which was when the scene of the robbery was investigated on site. So the police had the tape for one day before being released to the public.
Also as far as not releasing other types of information (autopsy report, dispatch tapes, etc.,), this may have to do with the FBI getting involved (which I think occurred on Monday the 11th)) and wanting to review the information before being released to the public.
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:03 pm to rb
quote:
Foot n mouth disease
Guess that would be me.
I had no idea people were arguing that he was running from the cop and the cop was justified in shooting him in the back once it was known he had been involved in previous robbery.
I cannot imagine it is legal to shoot someone running from cops, but I should get used to not being surprised with the laws in this country.
Either way, after learning of the legal justification for shooting a fleeing robbery suspect, I understand how him being a robber suspect would be relevant to the cop shooting him, if he was shot while fleeing.
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:04 pm to C
quote:
is this true? Link?
No, I dont believe its the same store.
ETA: I dont think its the Quick Trip judging from reading the police report. Dont know if its another store than was also looted etc.
This post was edited on 8/15/14 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:06 pm to kilo
quote:
I dont believe its the same store.
If true, I'd look into the violent rioting being started in order to cover up a crime.
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:08 pm to rb
quote:
Stop focusing on that statement and just call it possible retribution for killing his buddy.
You didn't say that, you've just adjusted your argument since the other was an obvious fail.
quote:
Would you take this guys statement as "fact" considering these circumstances?
I don't take any of the statements from either side as "fact" so far. The only facts not in dispute are an unarmed guy is dead and he was shot by the cops.
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:09 pm to novabill
quote:
I cannot imagine it is legal to shoot someone running from cops, but I should get used to not being surprised with the laws in this country.
I mean if it's a violent criminal, I wouldn't say it isn't justified. Especially if he was fighting with the cop. Assuming this wasn't typical behavior by him, I wonder if he was on drugs?
Posted on 8/15/14 at 1:11 pm to kilo
Yeah looked at the police report for the robbery and the numerics have been redacted.
This post was edited on 8/15/14 at 1:13 pm
Page 13 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News