- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/15/25 at 7:17 am to BCreed1
It’s almost like she works directly for the Cartels.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 7:47 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Is this how we finally get that whole government gun running thing unpeeled?
What was that called again? When the ATF was "leaking" guns to mexico?
Exactly. We will gladly hand over Barack Obama and Eric Holder for trial wherever they want.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 7:50 am to Perfect Circle
quote:It's been known for a while that Sheinbaum was propped up by them.
Those who resist bringing the cartels to heel are complicit and likely receiving cartels payoffs.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 7:52 am to BCreed1
Tell that big nosed bitch to pound sand
Posted on 2/15/25 at 7:55 am to Friscodog
quote:
Definitely sounds like the Mexican government is "protecting" the Cartels. Now why would they do that??
Same reasoning can be applied to Democrats being opposed to uncovering where US Tax Payer money has gone and other such corruption.
Dirty Dirty Dirty….
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:00 am to BCreed1
That lady sucks. All I needed to know about her was when she wanted the king of Spain to apologize for “colonizing” Mexico over 400 years ago to see how much of a clown she was. She is absolutely in bed with the cartels.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:03 am to BCreed1
Shut your whore mouth. Your pos country has killed more Americans than all wars combined. We will do as we please to eradicate the cartels, and we may just re-name you as Southern Arizona when we’re done.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:10 am to omegaman66
quote:
Could be an agreement to look tough so the cartels don't kill her.
Not saying that you're wrong.
But she's also playing to US Democrats who have also tried to sue gun makers to try to bankrupt them.
Mexico president already has a 10 billion lawsuit in the system that is going to end up being ruled on by SCOTUS. That suit is on their docket, I just don't know when they're gonna rule on it.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:13 am to BCreed1
This’ll be unpopular I’m sure, but I’ve been saying it for years: we need to invade Mexico.
The cartels are receiving foreign aid and that’s foreign interference into a country in the Americas. That’s Monroe Doctrine. Set the goal as destroying the cartels and any influence they have on Mexican independence and call it a day.
The cartels are receiving foreign aid and that’s foreign interference into a country in the Americas. That’s Monroe Doctrine. Set the goal as destroying the cartels and any influence they have on Mexican independence and call it a day.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:17 am to rmnldr
We should've annexed it all the way down to Panama back when we had the chance.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:17 am to BCreed1
quote:
The Guardian quoted Sheinbaum saying, “If they declare these criminal groups as terrorists, then we’ll have to expand our US lawsuit.” Part of the lawsuit expansion “could include alleged complicity of gunmakers with terror groups.”
It’s a confusing statement. Is she suggesting that the current lawsuit is that US gun makers are colluding with the cartels to arm them? And that if the cartels are classified as terrorists, then the claim will be that US gun makers are colluding with terrorists?
If the gun makers are knowingly arming the cartels, then maybe she is pushing in the right direction. We also want to disarm the cartels, don’t we?
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:20 am to HagaDaga
quote:
Pretty sad that this is what MX thinks is a threat, and all they got. Obviously in their courts she'll win, but wtf is she going to do about it??
Haga, her suit isn't in the MX court system. It's in ours.
She has an existing suit for 10 billion, listed for the same reason that she gave in the above article, used by cartels, and violent ends.
SCOTUS has it on their docket. No way she gonna win. Can't sue gun manufacturers for reasons like this, they have immunity. The sum is outrageously egregious, and she's from a foreign nation.
She gonna get stomped on by Clarence Thomas.
Edit- However, the terrorist avenue, would have standing. As providing aid to terrorists is federal law violation. It would play into her hands for the suit.
But, she'd have to prove it.
This post was edited on 2/15/25 at 8:53 am
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:26 am to cajunandy
quote:
Most believe that the Supreme Court will reverse the Court of Appeal and dismiss the Lawsuit. Oral argues are set for March 4,2025.
I wasn't sure when that case was coming up for judgement. Much appreciated Andy!
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:32 am to BCreed1
Why is she protecting the cartels?
Let the Mexican courts rule against US gun companies. We will laugh at them trying to enforce any of it
Let the Mexican courts rule against US gun companies. We will laugh at them trying to enforce any of it
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:32 am to BCreed1
So the mexican government is protecting the cartels , and we should give two fricks what they do.
Mexicans come to America and work hard,but have not idea how to live in America. They drive ( very poorly) old shity cars w/ no ins. It is amazing how they function in our country it's like a high functioning adult w/special needs.
Mexicans come to America and work hard,but have not idea how to live in America. They drive ( very poorly) old shity cars w/ no ins. It is amazing how they function in our country it's like a high functioning adult w/special needs.
This post was edited on 2/15/25 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:33 am to BCreed1
quote:
The Guardian quoted Sheinbaum saying, “If they declare these criminal groups as terrorists, then we’ll have to expand our US lawsuit.”
Part of the lawsuit expansion “could include alleged complicity of gunmakers with terror groups.”
is this where we turn around and sue Mexico for all the illegals raising our insurance due to not being insured and people having to pay out of pocket or live with injuries they would have otherwise have had handled? I am not for foreign wars, but keep barking down that road and I'll change my mind. Also, I can't imagine it will end well if Mexico is seen endorsing a terrorist group.
This post was edited on 2/15/25 at 8:34 am
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:35 am to BCreed1
It’s about time we make Mexico pay for the Alamo.
Kill every single member of the cartels and any politician that received a dime from them.
Kill every single member of the cartels and any politician that received a dime from them.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:36 am to TBoy
quote:
If the gun makers are knowingly arming the cartels, then maybe she is pushing in the right direction. We also want to disarm the cartels, don’t we?
This is like suing Toyota because some jihad frick slaps a 50 cal on an old one shipped to the Middle East.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:37 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
wonder how many of the guns left behind in AFG or sold to Ukraine have found their way to Mexico.
Tucker Carlson has made a statement about a large number of US arms to Ukraine, ending up in the hands of the Cartels. Including but not limited, to Javelin missiles.
The left was super fast to debunk the statement.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News