- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Merrick Garland got 70 confirmation votes in the Senate.
Posted on 11/16/24 at 6:32 pm to DavidTheGnome
Posted on 11/16/24 at 6:32 pm to DavidTheGnome
DavidtheGnome is not tired of losing.
Posted on 11/16/24 at 6:32 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Omg the sky is falling because they won’t rubber stamp confirm the guy I want!!
frick off
Posted on 11/16/24 at 6:33 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
DavidTheGnome
King cuck
Posted on 11/16/24 at 6:34 pm to RiverCityTider
Please don’t crucify me for this take poli board because I’m as MAGA as they come, but I think he received so many votes because at that time republicans were shaking in their boots over 1/6 and went along with whatever the Livs wanted.
Posted on 11/16/24 at 6:39 pm to Mandetyger29
quote:
Please don’t crucify me for this take poli board because I’m as MAGA as they come, but I think he received so many votes because at that time republicans were shaking in their boots over 1/6 and went along with whatever the Livs wanted.
not an unreasonable assertion, otherwise he might have "only" gotten 65.
Posted on 11/16/24 at 6:53 pm to RiverCityTider
What’s funny is how dirty these swamp fricks are. What is now equally funny is how they don’t know yet how Elon is going to put them out of a job. He just staked his entire fortune on it.
Posted on 11/16/24 at 7:10 pm to RiverCityTider
20 RINO's for sure but Gaetz will go in by recess appointment.
Posted on 11/16/24 at 7:25 pm to Mandetyger29
quote:
Please don’t crucify me for this take poli board because I’m as MAGA as they come, but I think he received so many votes because at that time republicans were shaking in their boots over 1/6 and went along with whatever the Livs wanted.
Holder was confirmed 75-21.
Janet Reno was unanimously confirmed.
John Ashcroft was confirmed 58-42
Gonzalez was confirmed 60-36
Posted on 11/16/24 at 7:27 pm to the808bass
quote:
Holder was confirmed 75-21.
Janet Reno was unanimously confirmed.
John Ashcroft was confirmed 58-42
Gonzalez was confirmed 60-36
Dems have party discipline
GOP does not
Posted on 11/16/24 at 7:29 pm to RiverCityTider
Merrick Garland has been politically motivated to the max. An absolute partisan hack.
Posted on 11/16/24 at 7:58 pm to RiverCityTider
Garland is a permanent government shlub. He would ensure power remains in the hands of the permanent government. So uniparty had no problem voting him in.
Gaetz is someone promising to overturn things. So there will be a constant stream of "dirt" leaked out against him, from the Intel agencies to the msm. And all uniparty will denounce and reject him.
Uniparty will ensure that only pro permanent government shills become the head of major agencies. Will probably see intel agencies and msm turn up the pressure on a lot of trump's appointments. Wouldn't surprise me if some of those appointments get spooked and step down themselves.
Gaetz is someone promising to overturn things. So there will be a constant stream of "dirt" leaked out against him, from the Intel agencies to the msm. And all uniparty will denounce and reject him.
Uniparty will ensure that only pro permanent government shills become the head of major agencies. Will probably see intel agencies and msm turn up the pressure on a lot of trump's appointments. Wouldn't surprise me if some of those appointments get spooked and step down themselves.
Posted on 11/16/24 at 8:09 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
don't know what it will take to break it up.
The threat of their lives in danger
Posted on 11/16/24 at 9:17 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
How do you continuously ignore the overt corruption and play it off as mere tribal politics?
There’s corruption no doubt. But just because one politician doesn’t get the approval of congress doesn’t mean I’m losing my sh!t. If every person just got rubber stamped in that’s where I’d have a problem
Posted on 11/16/24 at 9:24 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
There’s corruption no doubt. But just because one politician doesn’t get the approval of congress doesn’t mean I’m losing my sh!t. If every person just got rubber stamped in that’s where I’d have a problem
Did you not read the post about all thr Democrat AG nominees that got overwhelming GOP support?
What the hell sort of logic are you using?
Posted on 11/16/24 at 9:25 pm to RiverCityTider
Cool. Maybe they were more appealing for the job I dunno
Posted on 11/16/24 at 9:27 pm to Mandetyger29
quote:I really don’t care what their motivation for voting for Garland was.
Please don’t crucify me for this take poli board because I’m as MAGA as they come, but I think he received so many votes because at that time republicans were shaking in their boots over 1/6 and went along with whatever the Livs wanted.
The fact is that 20 of those sonofabitchs voted for Garland and he’s been as partisan of a fricking AG as I’ve ever seen, so there should be no hesitation to vote for Gaetz.
Posted on 11/16/24 at 9:30 pm to RiverCityTider
It's inexplicable the Recucklicans confirm all the Woke and radical Dims but the current Recucklicans question Trump's cabinet nominees.....makes no sense. 
Posted on 11/16/24 at 9:35 pm to udtiger
quote:
Dems have party discipline GOP does not
And the party needs to be remade into one that does.
Posted on 11/16/24 at 9:55 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:if someone's actions are illogical look for a motivation other than what you've assumed.
It's inexplicable the Recucklicans confirm all the Woke and radical Dims but the current Recucklicans question Trump's cabinet nominees.....makes no sense.
When you have found the motivation that makes the actions logical, you have now solved the puzzle.
So did any of those Dem nominations affect those senators or their friends directly? Were their any corruption investigations by the DOJ into anyone but Menendez? How about pharma, health, or MIC donors? How about any NGOs on the border?
Might that be a reason, with some horse trading, to approve their nominations?
Posted on 11/17/24 at 1:35 am to DavidTheGnome
Waisting your time. You lost.


Back to top


0












