- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/1/23 at 5:58 pm to Csmims
quote:
if a bartender who probably only opened beer cans for customers can become a member of congress anything is possible. We are truly lost as a country.
You do realize that George Washington was a farmer, right? Are layers the only people equipped to be politicians in your opinion?
But MM would not win and would be a dumb pick anyway.
This post was edited on 10/1/23 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 10/1/23 at 5:59 pm to Zach
Only if the object is to find a candidate who makes Kneepads look smart and distinguished.
Posted on 10/1/23 at 6:19 pm to 4cubbies
Also a business man and military man. What is a layer. Business men make better leaders than LAWYERS
Posted on 10/1/23 at 6:26 pm to Zach
Markle? ….. pffffft
Posted on 10/1/23 at 6:27 pm to Zach
That bimbo thinks she has a chance? Ha Ha
Posted on 10/1/23 at 6:29 pm to Gifman
quote:
She’d be an awful candidate
Um, she’s a multiracial celebrity democrat. I’d say as far as their candidate, she’s 100% perfect.
Posted on 10/1/23 at 6:39 pm to Zach
She was good in SUITS (I saw her boo boo once). But pretty sure she is useless as a politician. Not sure she could be worse than the Feinstein lady.
Posted on 10/1/23 at 6:45 pm to Zach
Media idiot narcissists like her need something like this. Her forthcoming massive failure will be a huge life wake-up call for her.
Posted on 10/1/23 at 7:42 pm to Csmims
Wasn't Joetato's sister pushing her for candidacy for presidency? I read that somewhere.
Posted on 10/1/23 at 8:41 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You do realize that George Washington was a farmer, right?
I’ve been told he was a rich, slave owner who married into money.
Posted on 10/1/23 at 8:44 pm to Zach
the video said Newsom had an hour long meeting with Harry and the wench and he told them he was going with someone else.
Posted on 10/1/23 at 8:50 pm to Zach
Tf does she bring to the table?
Posted on 10/1/23 at 9:45 pm to Zach
No way this is serious.
Posted on 10/1/23 at 9:56 pm to Mellow Drama
quote:
.. then she and AOC can form the congressional MENSA society.
Posted on 10/1/23 at 10:20 pm to Zach
Ain't she British royalty or something like that?
Posted on 10/1/23 at 10:30 pm to Redbone
quote:
congressional MENSA society.
Or the Menstrual Society
Free tampons for all citizens!
Posted on 10/1/23 at 10:31 pm to Zach
quote:
US Constitution
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8
quote:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
The Constitution’s prohibition on titles of nobility reflects both the American aversion to aristocracy and the republican character of the government established by the Constitution. The Clause thus complements other constitutional provisions—most notably the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments—that prohibit invidious governmental distinctions between classes of American citizens.
The Articles of Confederation and many Revolutionary-era state constitutions contained prohibitions of titles of nobility and other systems of hereditary privilege. The federal Title of Nobility Clause substantially follows the Articles’ prohibition and was not a subject of significant debate at the Constitutional Convention. As James Madison observed in the Federalist No. 44: The prohibition with respect to titles of nobility is copied from the articles of Confederation and needs no comment.
Anyone who thinks that grifter would ever (a) relinquish her Duchess title, and/or (b) cut a check to the US government (i.e., to address the emolument clause of the Constitution) hasn’t followed her behavior(s). No way in hell is this chick giving up money and/or a title.
The term emolument was strategically chosen by the Founding Fathers (weren’t they brilliant?) to include any kind of payment or fees for services. It’s very broad and can even include gifts. Any money falling her (Markle) way from Harry renders her ineligible to hold office.
And if someone wants to hypothetically argue she could simply cut a check for the nobility part of her income … it would take a team of highly qualified forensic accountants to tease out what portion of the money in her pocket—to include clothing, the income she derives from using the title Duchess of Sussex, the diamonds in her engagement ring (the list is long)—comes directly or indirectly from the estates of the British Royal Family.
Markle’s worth will soon include cash payments from nobility for divorce, child support, etc.
There’s no way this (Sen. Markle) would ever happen. The people of California are at greater risk of Oprah winning the seat than they are of Meghan Markle doing so.
This post was edited on 10/1/23 at 11:07 pm
Posted on 10/1/23 at 10:55 pm to Zach
Maybe a season 10 of Suits?
Posted on 10/1/23 at 11:16 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You do realize that George Washington was a farmer, right?
Yeah bc he was just a farmer nothing more
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News