Maybe the government is soft on crime because it wants excuses to restrict your freedoms

What?

Communist don't unleash the street animals by accident.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

Maybe there is no real interest in stopping crime

---

quote:

---

Our society / government could punish criminals in ways that would serve as real deterrents.

---

“But suppose the ox had a reputation for goring, and the owner had been informed but failed to keep it under control. If the ox then kills someone, it must be stoned, and the owner must also be put to death.” - Exodus 21:29 NLT

It is not enough to point solely to the offender. While they must be held accountable for their actions, those who had the authority and the duty to prevent foreseeable harm cannot be absolved. Judges, parole boards, prosecutors, and policymakers who knowingly permit the release of habitual violent offenders must also bear the weight of their decisions, especially when those decisions result in tragedy.

Each act of violence committed by a known repeat offender does not happen in a vacuum. It follows a series of deliberate choices: to grant parole, to reduce sentences, to dismiss charges, or to overlook warning signs in the name of leniency, political pressure, or flawed ideologies. These choices are not without consequence. They are direct contributors to the circumstances that allow violence to be repeated.

Consider a parole board that releases an individual with a documented history of sexual assault, only for that person to reoffend within months. Can we truly say that the only one to blame is the assailant? Or does culpability extend to those who ignored the red flags, who gambled with public safety, and who chose hope over hard evidence?

If a mechanic knowingly sends a faulty car onto the road and someone is killed, they can be held liable. If a doctor ignores test results and a patient dies, they face consequences. Why, then, should those who knowingly unleash violent offenders onto the public face no responsibility when lives are lost?

Justice demands more than punishment. It demands accountability at every level. To ignore this truth is to devalue the lives of victims, and to accept a system where the gatekeepers of justice bear no burden for the outcomes of their decisions.

Those who hold the keys to freedom must also hold the weight of its consequences. Anything less is a betrayal of public trust and a sentence carried out on the innocent.

crime is a city, county and state issue believe it or not 90% of the government you can see, touch and feel happens to you at the municipal, county and state level. what would you like me to do, living in little rock arkansas about the crime happening where you live? which according to your profile is no where. he11 son you don't even have a favorite team.

you really don't want federal over reach on crime, that's what got us the FBI and j edgar hoover.

Of course it is why the government is soft on crime. The primary reason the government wants your guns is to create greater fear from knowing you are left unprotected.

I believe the right to protect yourself in a natural, God given right.

The government is not soft on crime. Quite the opposite. We have the largest prison system in the world and have created systemic monetary incentives to continue to increase prisoner counts.

quote:

---

maybe, better analysis is the LEFT wants chaos so they fix it and look good

---

Like starting a war to cause global economic instability?

Only because of Trump.

quote:

---

Only because of Trump.

---

Back in the "THE DATA IS FAKE" era I completely predicted that narrative would 180 when the trend continued exactly the same under Trump