0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:09 am to alabamabuckeye
quote:
Sure bud, here you go: Jes Staley Leon Black Les Wexner David Copperfield Lapo Elkann Tom Pritzker Glenn Dubin Frédéric Fekkai Edoardo Teodorani Jean-Luc Brunel Daniel Siad Ramsey Elkholy Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Lesley Groff
I’m not 100% sure, but hadn’t all of these names been released already?
I also believe Congress has been given permission to view all unredacted “Epstein file” information.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:11 am to theunknownknight
Or Biden, or Obama.....
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:16 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Congressmen don't have prosecutorial powers.
What were the crimes? What’s the evidence? I stopped following this stuff years ago …
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:18 am to DeBoar
quote:
Also I thought you and Massie both were bragging you shut down Congress because of this bill?
In Ivory Bill Matt’s defense, … shutting down Congress would likely have little impact ….. after all, they do so little that resembles honest work.
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 6:24 am
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:19 am to riverdiver
quote:
I’m not 100% sure, but hadn’t all of these names been released already?
I also believe Congress has been given permission to view all unredacted “Epstein file” information.
I think 3 or 4 were new.
About 3 million files have yet to be released...so no, Congress has not been "given permission" to view all unredacted files.
The portion that has been made available is a pain to review. Members, not staff, have to go to a remote location to view the files at one of three (?) terminals.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:29 am to Marshhen
quote:
What were the crimes? What’s the evidence? I stopped following this stuff years ago …
There are all sorts of allegations of crimes...including murder on Epstein's Zorro Ranch in New Mexico. As to evidence, that's the whole point of the legislation. Is there evidence contained in the Epstein files that would warrant further investigations?
In July 2025, DOJ released a memo saying that there was nothing left to investigate---that Maxwell and Epstein were the only perps involved in trafficking girls and women to one person...Epstein. The Transparency laws are to test the truth of that statement.
This post was edited on 9/18/26 at 6:40 am
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:07 am to DeBoar
quote:
When is he going to name all the names? He’s only named like 6? Do we really need two Epstein bills for 6 clients?
Wah wah wah!!!
But he didn't list as many names as I think he should have!!!!!!!
REEEEEEEE!!!!!!!
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:08 am to RemyLeBeau
The fricking irony
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:09 am to IvoryBillMatt
Maybe we can finally get this done and over with.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:11 am to 3down10
quote:
He's named 14.
Why doesn’t he release the rest?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:12 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I suspect the voting will go like Epstein Files Transparency Act I.
What is different about the second bill? What’s in it that wasn’t in the first one?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:15 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Who knows what's in the 3 million Epstein Files that DOJ has failed to produce?
Massie said he has them and would release all the names. Was he lying?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:17 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
Imagine being a MAGA supporter and trying to defend not releasing the Epstein files in their entirety. Then, attacking and primarying the dude that is pushing for the release. Peak absurdity.
You can’t think of any reason? False accusations made by loons and the liability that comes with that? Investigations need to occur but a full release is irresponsible and could ruin innocent people’s live. And the pushing for the return lied about releasing the names himself. Clearly he doesn’t want that liability either. He is a grifter. Evidenced by the fact you far left wackos love him.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:18 am to BBONDS25
quote:
What is different about the second bill? What’s in it that wasn’t in the first one?
Probably the most important additions are the enforcement provisions. Here's a good summary of the second bill:
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:20 am to theunknownknight
4 years under Biden, not a single thing released.
Millions of docs released under Trump, but it's somehow all on him?
Trump wasn't President when Epstein got a sweetheart deal the 1st time he was arrested, back in 2006. If anything, he helped get him arrested.
Seriously, this mania needs to end.
Millions of docs released under Trump, but it's somehow all on him?
Trump wasn't President when Epstein got a sweetheart deal the 1st time he was arrested, back in 2006. If anything, he helped get him arrested.
Seriously, this mania needs to end.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:20 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
and you know...legislate on behalf of the people who sent them to represent us.
The same people that sent Massie packing?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:23 am to theunknownknight
I still get up every morning wondering why Obama or Biden did not ever use Epstein information, that they could have easily obtained or might have held, against those Republicans.
I may have to get professional help.
I may have to get professional help.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:24 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
He's wrapping up his 14 years in Congress with a bang.
He is in his death throes. He is irrelevant.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 7:24 am to 3down10
quote:
we get inflation and higher interest rates.
Both lower than historical averages. Try again.
Page 4 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News