Started By
Message

re: Mass tourism protests in Europe

Posted on 6/18/25 at 1:43 pm to
Posted by wallowinit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2006
17696 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

there’s some of the greatest places on earth right here in the United States it’s time we start spending our money here

Here, here!
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103923 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 1:45 pm to
They protest tourism but are fine with all these “migrants” permanently staying in their countries?
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
88991 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Tourists don’t set menu prices. Sounds like capitalism.

Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
38328 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Against tourism, yet for mass, uncontrolled immigration.


So ironic you could spread it on a cwossant
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16369 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 1:48 pm to
Hummm.

PBS feeding you poison.

Don't fall for it.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
60945 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Thousands rallied in Mallorca


Maybe they just don’t want caveman tourists, especially on their honeymoon.
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38656 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 1:53 pm to
Politics aside - it's pretty awful what seemingly has happened through tourism. Most of these places have had their identity ripped to shreds. And it sucks to see.

The only solution is limited tourism, so I would applaud some pushback. But now that they've built economies around it, it's impossible to go back.

Would loved to have visited Florence before it was overrun. I still loved it, but you can tell it's just a different place with an endless sea of tourists and a market and food scene built around it.

I can't believe anyone who values history and tradition thinking that result of mass tourism is good thing. It isn't. except that more people get to see the "veneer" of Florence. Ok, great. There's little under the hood anymore.

80% of tourists just want to "see" places and have no interest in experiencing it. And that's what the economies end up being built around. "Seeing" stuff.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24196 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Honestly, with few exceptions, I prefer hotels.


quote:

Mo Jeaux


You are either top 3% of income and pay for your kids to eat out all 3 meals every vacation or you just don't travel with kids. An apartment with a kitchen is far superior when traveling with kids. Between the space, a washing machine, small kitchen for breakfast and snacks, etc.

What good do hotels give locals? You think the Marriots and hiltons are owned locally? Apartments generally speaking are owned and managed locally. Locals can also live in them.

This idea that apartments are the issue here is nonsensical. There are plenty of ways to increase the amount of living spaces that has 0 effect on tourism.

If you really wanted to have an affect on apartments you'd not allow anyone to own something that wasn't a primary home. 2nd homes are a bigger issue in most of these places for local competition, someone that can afford to own and not rent it out will always outbid a local. I would never suggest that as it would cause a major housing crash, but that's what it would take.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24196 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

The only solution is limited tourism, so I would applaud some pushback. But now that they've built economies around it, it's impossible to go back.


The other solution is to increase their economy. They don't want to work by and large. Their biggest issue is not the tourists, its their lack of income to afford those places. Most of that comes from work ethic, pretty much all across Europe sans Germany, London, and Scandinavia.

I don't blame them, I'd much rather work less. But that's their choice.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26466 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Maybe they should cut down on their low quality immigration instead.

They are lucky they are still getting as many tourists as they are.


More no-go zones are an effective way to reduce tourism!
Posted by DocYatesVA
Yukon, OK
Member since Oct 2022
347 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:33 pm to
I was in Spain last summer and they were doing the same thing. Complaining about the tourists. Apparently, the AirBnB model they use in places like Barcelona, either displaces the locals or makes the rent so high they cannot afford it. Of course they don't mind you paying way too much for their overpriced items or their food, or charging you $100EU for a ride from the airport, but they don't want all the other things that come with a booming economy. As much as i tried I found it very hard to be sympathetic with the Spaniards in Barcelona and Ibeza as they were fawning over my weakened American dollar.
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
19283 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:35 pm to
They’ll protest against wealthy visitors but welcome uneducated, lawless brown people rolling up on their shores in canoes
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
27469 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

This morning I read an article about the Lourve shutting down in response to “mass tourism.”
that seems silly...why not just restrict ticket sales?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138757 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

Mass tourism protests in Europe
Identical to open borders here (and there). The objective is social undermining. Stable successful systems cannot be replaced unless they are destabilized with flagging success.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63590 posts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

You are either top 3% of income and pay for your kids to eat out all 3 meals every vacation or you just don't travel with kids. An apartment with a kitchen is far superior when traveling with kids. Between the space, a washing machine, small kitchen for breakfast and snacks, etc.

What good do hotels give locals? You think the Marriots and hiltons are owned locally? Apartments generally speaking are owned and managed locally. Locals can also live in them.

This idea that apartments are the issue here is nonsensical. There are plenty of ways to increase the amount of living spaces that has 0 effect on tourism.

If you really wanted to have an affect on apartments you'd not allow anyone to own something that wasn't a primary home. 2nd homes are a bigger issue in most of these places for local competition, someone that can afford to own and not rent it out will always outbid a local. I would never suggest that as it would cause a major housing crash, but that's what it would take.


Eh, I do OK, and I do have 2 kids, so when I do travel (other than occasional business trips and a few trips with just me and my wife) I typically do travel with my kids.

I think that you're mischaracterizing the effect that the AirBnBs have on the local economies. They have in large part been blamed (fairly or not) on housing crises in certain cities. While they may be managed locally, they often aren't necessarily owned locally, and they are seen as taking away real estate meant for residential purposes and restructuring it for commercial purposes.

All that being said, my preference for hotels is based primarily on my own comfort. Except for our beach vacations (where we do tend to stay in more residential-type locations) we're generally not preparing meals and snacking in our rooms.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram