- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Mamdani, city leaders accused of racially engineering elite public HS's to keep Asians out
Posted on 4/28/26 at 10:12 pm
Posted on 4/28/26 at 10:12 pm
Textbook systemic racism
NY Post
quote:
Zohran Mamdani and city Democrat leaders stand accused of “racially engineering” New York City’s elite public high schools, according to a Brooklyn mom who last week brought a federal lawsuit against the mayor and the Department of Education.
Yi Fang Chen, 45, is challenging the admissions process for the city’s nine Specialized High Schools (SHS) after her eldest son was denied admission to Stuyvesant High School, despite scoring in the top five percent on the admissions exam, which he took in November.
Some 26,000 students take the Specialized High Schools Admissions Test each year, competing for around 5,000 places.
Chen told The Post her 13-year-old son scored 558 in the rigorous exam and Stuyvesant requires a score of 561, but he was still rejected. Her lawsuit challenges revisions to the admissions for the 2019 school year, which allocate 20 percent of all available seats for students who specifically got lower test scores but meet other criteria, such as coming from a lower-income background.
“Starting in 2020, the City began reserving 20 percent of its SHS seats for a separate admissions pathway — the Discovery program — that excludes students based on criteria the City purposefully selected to change the racial composition of those schools,” according to the lawsuit.
“The City adopted and continues to enforce that policy in an effort to reduce the number of Asian-American students and increase the number of black and Hispanic students admitted to the SHSs.
Chen says her son did not meet any of the qualifications for the Discovery Program.
Chen told The Post students who scored up to 100 points below her son will be granted admission to Stuyvesant instead. “It’s very upsetting,” the data scientist and mother of three added.
NY Post
This post was edited on 4/28/26 at 10:24 pm
Posted on 4/28/26 at 10:18 pm to L.A.
She probably votes Dem up and down the ballot in every election.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 10:18 pm to L.A.
Some animas are more equal than others.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 10:29 pm to OysterPoBoy
"Chen told The Post her 13-year-old son scored 558 in the rigorous exam and Stuyvesant requires a score of 561, but he was still rejected."
Duh
Duh
Posted on 4/28/26 at 10:29 pm to L.A.
quote:
Chen told The Post her 13-year-old son scored 558 in the rigorous exam and Stuyvesant requires a score of 561, but he was still rejected
So he scored below the minimum required score and was rejected. What am I missing?
I think she's right about the racism angle for other reasons, but he objectively scored under the required score.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 10:34 pm to TigerFanatic99
[quote]What am I missing?[/quote
Others who scored 100 points below her child were granted admission.
Others who scored 100 points below her child were granted admission.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 11:18 pm to toratiger
Bogalusa had a fantastic magnet school for high achievers and the blacks demanded it be 40% African American minimum. Whitey went flighty and now they’re the worst system in the State.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 11:21 pm to L.A.
quote:
Mamdani
quote:
racially engineering

Posted on 4/29/26 at 5:21 am to L.A.
quote:
revisions to the admissions for the 2019 school year, which allocate 20 percent of all available seats for students who specifically got lower test scores but meet other criteria, such as coming from a lower-income background.
This perfectly encapsulates the liberal philosophy about education: getting/having the title has primacy over the actual education. This is why they change how merit is defined, in order to have a feel-good song and dance about "increasing marginalized representation" (or something similar).
But, of course, they only want under-performing groups represented. This then helps them create the foundational narrative of "systemic racism" (ie: the reason certain groups don't do well in school isn't culture nor community, but mean ol' whitey keeping them down) from which they create CRT, DEI, the 1619 Project, etc.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 5:26 am to SloaneRanger
quote:
She probably votes Dem up and down the ballot in every election
Which is why she’s pissed. She wants her payback.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 5:34 am to TigerFanatic99
quote:
So he scored below the minimum required score and was rejected. What am I missing?
quote:
Chen told The Post students who scored up to 100 points below her son will be granted admission to Stuyvesant instead.
Cut off score for Asian kids: 561
Cut off score for black kids: 458
I'd call that racial discrimination.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 7:11 am to Smeg
quote:
Cut off score for black kids: 458
Asians should just all put down black.
Then sue when they get rejected.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 7:24 am to Smeg
Welfare + black on white crime + affirmative action + DEI + fraud
Reparations? They owe us reparations .
Reparations? They owe us reparations .
Posted on 4/29/26 at 7:35 am to L.A.
Zohran wants all kids to have access to these programs
Popular
Back to top

7










