- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MAHA: Child vaccine schedule reduces from 72 jabs to 11
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:20 am to BBONDS25
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:20 am to BBONDS25
quote:
13 times I’ve asked this now and not one single attempt at an answer.
The infographic you posted leads the viewer to understand that's how many "jabs" to a baby. That's pretty misleading no matter what side of the issue you're on.
0
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:20 am to BBONDS25
quote:
How many jabs recommended? Why are you scared to answer?
My brother, he already acknowledged that a few pages ago. You may have gotten confused though, because this is around when you decided to change your argument. No one was denying the total amount of shots.
quote:
Yeh, dumbass, it was 17 vaccines
If you want to compare us to Europe it’s 17 vaccines to 11 vaccines, or 72 jabs to 60 jabs
Saying 72 to 11 “jabs or injections” is 100% false comparison .
The title of this thread is even worse The vaccine schedule in no way shape or form went from “72 to 11”
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:22 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Right. But lets have a 37 page bitch fest over the wording of a tweet.
Maybe these tweets are purposeful... you're right, the merits have flown out the window while we debate terms. It's frustrating.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:24 am to BBONDS25
quote:
but the apoplectic reactionaries are flipping out about trump using the number 72.
Accuracy in comparison is the best defense against "flipping out".
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:25 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Right. But lets have a 37 page bitch fest over the wording of a tweet. Maybe people want to focus on that rather than actually discuss the merits of the old schedule compared to the new.
Come on dude, people question the merits because it’s presented in such a disingenuous way.
I don’t think it’s too much to ask to have clarity on shite that is as important as this. “72 to 11” is fricking nonsense.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:30 am to lsupride87
maybe so. MMR is still required.
what's your point?
people have more choice now than they did before in a sound, peer-reviewed schedule that offers flexibility, and jabs no longer required are still covered. The only reason people are melting is because its being done under Trump (who, ironically, is a vaccine lover).
what's your point?
people have more choice now than they did before in a sound, peer-reviewed schedule that offers flexibility, and jabs no longer required are still covered. The only reason people are melting is because its being done under Trump (who, ironically, is a vaccine lover).
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:32 am to Vacherie Saint
What additional choice do they have they didn’t before?
Also, the argument is the disingenuous nature of the announcement in order to intentionally mislead people. It’s ridiculous and EVERYONE should call it out
Also, the argument is the disingenuous nature of the announcement in order to intentionally mislead people. It’s ridiculous and EVERYONE should call it out
This post was edited on 1/6/26 at 11:33 am
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:35 am to Mikes My Tiger
quote:
My brother, he already acknowledged that a few pages ago. You may have gotten confused though, because this is around when you decided to change your argument. No one was denying the total amount of shots.
My man.
finally someone admits it. Now. Regale us with your educational accomplishments!!!Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:35 am to NawlinsTiger9
I mean... I'm not going to count because I think its stupid but the "european country" referenced is likely Denmark, which recommends almost nothing compared to the US.
But either way, the real story gets lost in all that.
But either way, the real story gets lost in all that.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:39 am to BBONDS25
quote:
My man. finally someone admits it. Now. Regale us with your educational accomplishments!!!
I was messing with you earlier, but I have an MBA since you asked. 
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:42 am to lsupride87
Ironically, the Europeans believe in reducing vaccine requirements because people generally are MORE hesitant when the schedule is overloaded. A key part of the new schedule is allowing people to make more personal decisions with their doctor to hopefully restore public trust in healthcare lost during the pandemic. These should, in many cases, be personal decisions.
But I'll level with you. I already know you want to force me and every parent to do what you think is best, and there's really nothing that can be said on this board that'll change your view. Just know, before you go on a 90 page vaccine crusade, the feelings are very mutual.
But I'll level with you. I already know you want to force me and every parent to do what you think is best, and there's really nothing that can be said on this board that'll change your view. Just know, before you go on a 90 page vaccine crusade, the feelings are very mutual.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:45 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:I don’t think anyone should be forced to be vaccinated . Should never be govt mandates requiring that of a citizen
But I'll level with you. I already know you want to force me and every parent to do what you think is best, and there's really nothing that can be said on this board that'll change your view. Just know, before you go on a 90 page vaccine crusade, the feelings are very mutual.
I do beleive a private business should be able to have the choice on what it wants of its employees (and the govt should have the same right for its employees/“buisness)
But nobody should ever be forced, and the govt should never be able to force a private business want it requires of its said employees
And if a company wants its employees to be vaccinated and you don’t like it, you should weigh that just as any other requirements the company has
This post was edited on 1/6/26 at 11:48 am
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:49 am to BBONDS25
quote:
No you haven’t. I cited the CDC, dummy. You’re just another average TDS infected loon.
When?
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:51 am to Mikes My Tiger
quote:
I was messing with you earlier, but I have an MBA since you asked.
Cute. :thumbsup:
Posted on 1/6/26 at 12:14 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Yeh, dumbass, it was 17 vaccines
Liar. Or just an ignorant rube. Either way.
It looks like its 17, plus:
Influenza A
Influenza B
Covid?
Is that correct?
Posted on 1/6/26 at 12:16 pm to baldona
It’s 17 including those
Posted on 1/6/26 at 12:16 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I don’t think anyone should be forced to be vaccinated . Should never be govt mandates requiring that of a citizen
I don't disagree with this. But I also have no issues with government mandates for things like being enrolled in the school system or other government ran organizations. If you want to home school, have at it.
But I'm not sure I agree with having kids completely un vaccinated in the school system.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 12:16 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
I have read study after study.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 12:17 pm to lsupride87
quote:
It’s 17 including those
I'm not arguing, but what did I overcount? From the CDC link it was 20? There's some big words in there so I'll be honest I'm not sure
Posted on 1/6/26 at 12:18 pm to baldona
quote:Correct. I included that in my post
But I also have no issues with government mandates for things like being enrolled in the school system or other government ran organizations. If you want to home school, have at it.
Page 8 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News