- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MAHA: Child vaccine schedule reduces from 72 jabs to 11
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:07 am to lsupride87
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:07 am to lsupride87
quote:
While saying Europe only has 11….. It’s 100% incorrect. Clear?
How many jabs did the CDC recommend in 2025. It’s a very simple question.
This post was edited on 1/6/26 at 11:08 am
2
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:11 am to lsupride87
quote:
There is no debate. He said 72 vaccines and doubled down on it multiple times
Y'all are spiking the ball over semantics... that's not a big win.
Curious... do you consider the annual flu vaccine as one vaccine, despite composition updates each year?
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:11 am to lsupride87
The Europeans generally require LESS vaccine doses in the first 18 months than the US - that's the truth no matter how you want to state the numbers. Their timing is better and they use more combo vaccines. In Europe, one jab may include 6 different vaccines. Also, some of the formerly required vaccines will now be in other buckets for either high-risk kids or based on parent/physician decision.
The new schedule is actually modeled after some European countries and still covers all the previous vaccines with insurance. This isn't that big a deal.
Its like we can't do anything anymore without this reflexive political bitching.
The new schedule is actually modeled after some European countries and still covers all the previous vaccines with insurance. This isn't that big a deal.
Its like we can't do anything anymore without this reflexive political bitching.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:11 am to BBONDS25
quote:
17 vaccines….
Here is pride 3 pages ago trying to throw you a lifeline so you’ll stop making a fool of yourself, and here is your reply:
quote:
Laughably wrong
Sorry bubba, just take the L
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:12 am to SallysHuman
quote:No we aren’t
Y'all are spiking the ball over semantics... that's not a big win.
The entire thread is a fallacy because it makes the comparison of “72 to 11”
This isn’t difficult
It isn’t semantics when something is 100% based off a lie Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:13 am to BBONDS25
quote:
How many jabs did the CDC recommend in 2025. It’s a very simple question.
For what population?
Jabs as in actual needles piercing the skin, or count of vaccine in each shot?
They aren't going to play with you if you keep using such imprecise language.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:14 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Y'all are spiking the ball over semantics... that's not a big win.
His attempt to save face is a lame play to the semantics
His doubling and tripling down on the number of vaccines is not a semantic issue, he was just wrong.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:14 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:Which the people who have vaccine hesitancy here seem to hate the most…
In Europe, one jab may include 6 different vaccines
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:14 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Here is pride 3 pages ago trying to throw you a lifeline so you’ll stop making a fool of yourself, and here is your reply:
How many yellow boxes in the CDC link. Ive asked a dozen times and not one of you will answer.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:14 am to lsupride87
quote:
Which the people who have vaccine hesitancy here seem to hate the most…
How many jabs recommended? Why are you scared to answer?
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:15 am to lsupride87
quote:
The entire thread is a fallacy because it makes the comparison of “72 to 11”
Yeah, it could have been presented better- but the point remains US infants get way too many different things introduced into their systems. The schedule needed some tidying.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:15 am to SallysHuman
quote:
For what population? Jabs as in actual needles piercing the skin, or count of vaccine in each shot? They aren't going to play with you if you keep using such imprecise language.
Children under the age of 18. How many total shots did the CDC recommend in 2025 for children by the time they reach 18?
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:16 am to lsupride87
sure. if a non-essential vaccine is packaged with an essential one in this way, I could see parents getting upset.
people rightfully want bodily autonomy and the freedom to choose.
people rightfully want bodily autonomy and the freedom to choose.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:17 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
His attempt to save face is a lame play to the semantics
Since I posted that, we're back to using "jabs" from him... Oh well, I tried.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:17 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Yeah, it could have been presented better
I mean, it’s beyond misleading or presentation. It’s just a lie.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:17 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:Thats not why. People don’t like “putting too many vaccines in at once”. Look at MMR, and others, people already want those broken out separately. People would not want to move to the Euro model where one shot could be 6 separate vaccines
sure. if a non-essential vaccine is packaged with an essential one in this way, I could see parents getting upset.
Even Trump says you should take MMR as separate shots …. Going to a 6 shot combo like Europe would cause pandemonium for those already hesitant here
This post was edited on 1/6/26 at 11:19 am
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:18 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Since I posted that, we're back to using "jabs" from him... Oh well, I tried.
I mean. It’s the language used in the OP. I’m fine with calling them shots.
quote:
Children under the age of 18. How many total shots did the CDC recommend in 2025 for children by the time they reach 18?
13 times I’ve asked this now and not one single attempt at an answer.
This post was edited on 1/6/26 at 11:19 am
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:19 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Children under the age of 18. How many total shots did the CDC recommend in 2025 for children by the time they reach 18?
Okay, now you're getting somewhere.
18 years is a long time.
I'm more interested in how many individual vaccinating agents an infant receives in his first year of life.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:20 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Yeah, it could have been presented better- but the point remains US infants get way too many different things introduced into their systems. The schedule needed some tidying.
Right. But lets have a 37 page bitch fest over the wording of a tweet. Maybe people want to focus on that rather than actually discuss the merits of the old schedule compared to the new.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:20 am to SallysHuman
quote:
I'm more interested in how many individual vaccinating agents an infant receives in his first year of life.
Agreed…but the apoplectic reactionaries are flipping out about trump using the number 72. Which is factually correct.
Page 7 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News