- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana Amendments
Posted on 3/29/25 at 3:11 pm to Bow08tie
Posted on 3/29/25 at 3:11 pm to Bow08tie
quote:
Be very concerned about those last three words (leaves it open ended) on prop No. 2
You think they could fit the entire amendment in the little box on the voting machines? Stop spreading fear over nothing.
https://www.legis.la.gov/legis/ViewDocument.aspx?d=1391522
Posted on 3/29/25 at 3:44 pm to MrXYZ
Reddit is freaking out about all of them and saying NO, NO, NO, NO so all YES seems to be the way to go here.
Posted on 3/29/25 at 4:22 pm to FieldEngineer
No fear spreading intended
Wording is everything. When it’s left open ended intentions are suspect.
Wording is everything. When it’s left open ended intentions are suspect.
Posted on 3/29/25 at 5:32 pm to Bow08tie
quote:
No fear spreading intended Wording is everything. When it’s left open ended intentions are suspect.
You’re either intentionally being misleading or you haven’t looked at the actual amendment text.
Posted on 3/29/25 at 5:40 pm to The Boat
Amendment 2 keeps a sales tax in place on streaming and cuts public school funding. The positive is that it caps the tax rate at 3.75 (we pay 3 now anyway so who cares).
I voted no because I’m sick of having sales taxes on everything.
I voted no because I’m sick of having sales taxes on everything.
Posted on 3/29/25 at 5:52 pm to Burt Reynolds
“Amendment 2 keeps a sales tax in place on streaming and cuts public school funding.”
NOT true: the digital goods was a statute not impacted by constitutional amendment, it was a part of the offset for the income tax cuts
The education piece is maybe the most brilliant thing this state has ever proposed… It’s basically the Dave Ramsey plan of solving problems.
We currently have $2 billion in a savings account. It can only be invested in investments that earn less than 3%.
So that generates ~$60 million for education
We also have a debt to the teacher retirement system that we have to pay off at 9% interest
You take the money earning 3% and pay off the debt running at 9%
The savings is enough to fund the stuff that was paid for with the 60 million…. And also take the extra savings and fund the teacher pays
It’s good for the retirement system because you were adding $2 billion to the retirement system
And it’s good for the education because you’re using the benefit from the interest rate difference to fund something for them
It is not bad for education in any way that can possibly be constructed
“The positive is that it caps the tax rate at 3.75 (we pay 3 now anyway so who cares).” The current maximum is 4.75 so probably good to keep a future legislature from screwing things up… And yes, the overall package brought it from 4.25 to 3.0
NOT true: the digital goods was a statute not impacted by constitutional amendment, it was a part of the offset for the income tax cuts
The education piece is maybe the most brilliant thing this state has ever proposed… It’s basically the Dave Ramsey plan of solving problems.
We currently have $2 billion in a savings account. It can only be invested in investments that earn less than 3%.
So that generates ~$60 million for education
We also have a debt to the teacher retirement system that we have to pay off at 9% interest
You take the money earning 3% and pay off the debt running at 9%
The savings is enough to fund the stuff that was paid for with the 60 million…. And also take the extra savings and fund the teacher pays
It’s good for the retirement system because you were adding $2 billion to the retirement system
And it’s good for the education because you’re using the benefit from the interest rate difference to fund something for them
It is not bad for education in any way that can possibly be constructed
“The positive is that it caps the tax rate at 3.75 (we pay 3 now anyway so who cares).” The current maximum is 4.75 so probably good to keep a future legislature from screwing things up… And yes, the overall package brought it from 4.25 to 3.0
Posted on 3/29/25 at 6:03 pm to Judg7123
While Amendment 2 itself doesn’t explicitly mention streaming services, it ties into a broader tax reform package from the November 2024 special session. One of those related laws, House Bill 4 (Act 13), explicitly imposes a state sales tax on digital goods and services—including streaming services like Netflix, Hulu, and others—effective January 1, 2025. This brings Louisiana in line with many states that have expanded sales tax to cover digital consumption, taxing these services at the state rate of 5% which increased from 4.45% via House Bill 10)
Amendment 2 supports this by not altering or removing that new tax. It preserves the state’s ability to tax a broad range of goods and services as defined by existing and future laws, which now includes digital products. Specifically, the amendment’s language about maintaining the current tax base and allowing local governments to align their ordinances with state law means that streaming services will remain taxable at the state level, and local governments can also opt to apply their own sales taxes to these services if they amend their tax codes accordingly. Louisiana’s local sales tax rates, which can exceed 5% in some areas, could thus stack on top of the state tax, potentially making streaming subscriptions noticeably more expensive depending on where you live in the state. Amendment 2 doesn’t directly impose the tax on Netflix that’s already done via separate legislation—but it locks in the framework that keeps it taxable, with no easy path to undo it. Your streaming bill in Louisiana will indeed reflect that 5% state sales tax starting this year, plus any local taxes if your parish or city jumps on board.
Amendment 2 supports this by not altering or removing that new tax. It preserves the state’s ability to tax a broad range of goods and services as defined by existing and future laws, which now includes digital products. Specifically, the amendment’s language about maintaining the current tax base and allowing local governments to align their ordinances with state law means that streaming services will remain taxable at the state level, and local governments can also opt to apply their own sales taxes to these services if they amend their tax codes accordingly. Louisiana’s local sales tax rates, which can exceed 5% in some areas, could thus stack on top of the state tax, potentially making streaming subscriptions noticeably more expensive depending on where you live in the state. Amendment 2 doesn’t directly impose the tax on Netflix that’s already done via separate legislation—but it locks in the framework that keeps it taxable, with no easy path to undo it. Your streaming bill in Louisiana will indeed reflect that 5% state sales tax starting this year, plus any local taxes if your parish or city jumps on board.
Posted on 3/29/25 at 6:09 pm to Burt Reynolds
If I pay a 10% tax on $50 a month of streaming that that’s five dollars
$60 a year
If I have $4800 of taxable income, then I got a better deal from the income tax cuts…
And either way amendment two has nothing to do with the statute that you mentioned
that statute is going to stay in effect whether amendment 2 passes or not
i’ll spot you that I would’ve preferred that they just cut taxes with no offsets and from that perspective, I agree with you…. But it’s not gonna change if amendment 2 fails so voting against it because of that makes no sense
$60 a year
If I have $4800 of taxable income, then I got a better deal from the income tax cuts…
And either way amendment two has nothing to do with the statute that you mentioned
that statute is going to stay in effect whether amendment 2 passes or not
i’ll spot you that I would’ve preferred that they just cut taxes with no offsets and from that perspective, I agree with you…. But it’s not gonna change if amendment 2 fails so voting against it because of that makes no sense
This post was edited on 3/29/25 at 6:11 pm
Posted on 3/29/25 at 6:34 pm to Judg7123
It is a lot more services than just Netflix, it’s every subscription electronic and software service.
Concerning income, as of 2025 no one is paying 4.75% anymore. The tax cuts are already in effect. It just caps what they could raise it to for high earners in the future. I didn’t think it would go up past 4% again, which is why I voted no.
Concerning income, as of 2025 no one is paying 4.75% anymore. The tax cuts are already in effect. It just caps what they could raise it to for high earners in the future. I didn’t think it would go up past 4% again, which is why I voted no.
Posted on 3/29/25 at 6:35 pm to stelly1025
quote:
Closed primaries will happen in 26.
Closed primaries for what?
This has to be something National people are pushing on us, so I’m against it. I like our open primary system
This post was edited on 3/29/25 at 6:41 pm
Posted on 3/29/25 at 6:45 pm to MrXYZ
Does voting “yes” or “no” to any of these give our government less power. I will always vote for less power.
Posted on 3/29/25 at 6:51 pm to MrXYZ
I voted YES on all because all the shite libs I know said to vote no.
Posted on 3/29/25 at 8:43 pm to Trout Bandit
quote:
I voted YES on all because all the shite libs I know said to vote no.
Ironically I think their advertising campaigns made more people aware of the election and hurt their cause…
Posted on 3/29/25 at 8:51 pm to chalmetteowl
All amendments are failing…tightest race is #4.
Posted on 3/29/25 at 10:52 pm to FieldEngineer
No. 2 failed state wide. Enough people were awake.
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:47 am to Bow08tie
The level of ignorance on this thread is fricking unbelievable. None of you assholes who voted no have any idea what is going on. So we will just keep falling further and further behind.
Posted on 3/30/25 at 8:24 am to Bigdibber
quote:What’s ignorant are the people who actually thought there was a tax cut in Amendment 2 when it was actually about politicians raiding trust funds and taking taxing authority away from the parishes so they could centralize power.
the level of ignorance on this thread is fricking unbelievable. None of you assholes who voted no have any idea what is going on.
Thank goodness Landry failed. It brings a tear to my eye.
This post was edited on 3/30/25 at 8:25 am
Popular
Back to top


1






