Started By
Message

re: Looks like Pfizer and Moderna vaccines may also be causing blood clots

Posted on 4/17/21 at 3:20 pm to
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25063 posts
Posted on 4/17/21 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

ou guys are going to cheer this on and then cry when the politicians inevitably take advantage of vaccines being slowed or halted


Oh boy, stop the vaccines we need more lockdowns!

Last week we passed over 188 million vaccinations.
Posted by redfish99
B.R.
Member since Aug 2007
18698 posts
Posted on 4/17/21 at 3:27 pm to
Had my second Pfizer on Thursday. Was a little sluggish until today. Just finished working out all good for me. Got my shite card laminated
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

i just pointed out that it wasn't the death sentence people think of it in 2021
oh absolutely. as far as the vaccine itself, two totally different things
Posted by thetempleowl
dallas, tx
Member since Jul 2008
15909 posts
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

Additionally, the shot is a conscious choice. If there is any risk, why take the risk?


Everything is a risk. Crossing a street is a risk. Walking down stairs is a risk. Talking an aspirin is a risk. Everything has a reward. The key is to minimize risks while maximizing rewards.

quote:

For those who are healthy, not scared of Covid, and have already lived through a year of it, the risk in the vaccine seems excessive, even if currently debatable



The risk of clot is literally less than the proverbial one in a million chance.

You are more likely to be hit by lightning. You are way more likely to be attacked by a shark. You are way more likely to die from a car crash.

And good lord, I talk about the risks on liberal sites and say young healthy people have maybe a 1 in 25 to maybe even 50,000 chance of dying from covid. I tell idiot leftists that if you are below 40 and healthy you have a tiny chance of dying.

The odds of getting a clot from the vaccine is 20 to 100 times lower than that. It's just insane.

6 people. 6 out of 6.8 million. And the fricktards that got the vaccine are like oh my God, what do I do? fricking live your life. You are pretty much bullet proof from covid. Oh, and you have a tiny miniscule chance of something happening.

Do people know how to weigh risks versus rewards?

People here laugh at the liberals because the chances of dying from this are low and they get their panties in a wad over this.

Well idiots here are getting upset at something that happens less than one in a million.

People have no idea how to maximize their risks/ rewards profile.
Posted by thetempleowl
dallas, tx
Member since Jul 2008
15909 posts
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

As such, until more is truly known about the long term effects, taking a Covid vaccine is a no go for me. The ONLY one that I would even remotely consider is the Johnson & Johnson one.


You see, this is the crazy thing to me.

Mrna vaccines are going to revolutionize vaccines for viruses.

The old way of making them is more expensive and less beneficial. You would choose to take a vaccine with lower efficacy. Not only that but good God, now you have a one in a million chance of getting cvst.

The materials in the mrna vaccines are known. Their effects are known. The antibodies they create are known and designed. The antibodies are only some of the antibodies of you actually get if you were to get the virus.

In reality the idea about throwing a baseball and throwing a wrench are comparable to this. The rules of reality are the same. The laws of gravity are the same we know how these things will work.

And the push to vaccinate is by anyone who knows. It's beyond strange how some people think.

Maximize rewards and minimize risks. The vaccine is a no brainer. And this is coming from someone who knows the mortality risks of the virus for the healthy and young is tiny.

The problem with people is they are very poor at minimizing risks and maximizing rewards.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
14858 posts
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

oh absolutely. as far as the vaccine itself, two totally different things


The vaccines actually followed pretty similar timelines. Attenuated polio vaccines were granted emergency usage 11 months after discovery. Salk's vaccine was licensed internationally less than two years after discovery
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
42003 posts
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

Their effects are known.


So link me to the long term studies illustrating their effects. This isn’t difficult. In short, what you claim is a lie. Period.
Posted by DaBeerz
Member since Sep 2004
18297 posts
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:44 pm to
Covid can cause blood clots too, I did not get shot
This post was edited on 4/17/21 at 5:45 pm
Posted by thetempleowl
dallas, tx
Member since Jul 2008
15909 posts
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

link me to the long term studies illustrating their effects. 


We know the effects of everything put into the vaccine. What we don't know are the long term effects of the antibodies but they will be the same or less than getting the virus.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
42003 posts
Posted on 4/17/21 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

What we don't know are the long term effects of the antibodies

Okay

but they will be the same or less than getting the virus.

That is unknown.


Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
15653 posts
Posted on 4/17/21 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

The odds of getting a clot from the vaccine is 20 to 100 times lower than that. It's just insane.

But is it 20 or is it 100? I’m not expecting an answer. The reason I’m asking is because in the past year only 9% of the US have ever tested positive for Covid. And that includes false positives and peak periods of contamination. Yet we’re hitting the accelerator on getting the vaccine at a rate now approaching 30% of the population with the goal being much higher. Isn’t it fair to be asking if we are increasing a risk for a portion of the population that would otherwise not be at risk?

Just today my wife and I had lunch with some friends, one of whom has worked as an ER nurse for the past 20 years. She said they saw a sudden increase in admissions with blood clots and 100% of them had recently received the Covid vaccine, with one patient not surviving. She was aware of this before the news was being reported. She advised her experience at her hospital was the reason she was not recommending these vaccines.

By brother in law has been an internationally respected medical researcher for the past 30 years. He’s not recommending these vaccines for people not in high risk groups.

What are these people overlooking?
This post was edited on 4/17/21 at 6:16 pm
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 4/17/21 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Their effects are known
this is still untrue no matter how many times it is repeated. It is a fact that mrna vaccines have never been approved for broad public use. They may end up being the greatest thing to ever exist but that won't be known for years
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 12:07 am to
quote:

You guys are going to cheer this on
What's funny is the same people pointing to this to take a victory lap are the same dudes on here who were praising Trump and giving him credit for getting this vaccine out as quickly as "he did"
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29044 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 12:43 am to
quote:

You have confirmation that Covid 19 is unquestionably what killed the 500,000 or so claimed "Covid deaths"?
Well, roughly 500k more people died in 2020 than were expected given typical death rates. So if covid didn't kill them, then we've got an even bigger problem on our hands.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29044 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 12:50 am to
quote:

The former chief scientist for Pfizer said the only reason you would ever make a vaccine for something as non lethal as covid is population control - pay attention.
We get vaccines for flu every year, and that's ten times less lethal than covid. We have vaccines for chickenpox which is probably a hundred times less lethal than covid.

Where do you guys get this shite from?
Posted by TheRoarRestoredInBR
Member since Dec 2004
31030 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 12:56 am to
I believe they are referencing Dr Mike Yeadon on Delingpol pod on Bitchute.

It was a solid 1 hr long listen. I've listened to it twice.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135499 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 5:23 am to
quote:

But is it 20 or is it 100? I’m not expecting an answer.
It's an interesting question. Every 40 seconds someone in the US has a stroke. The rate runs about 800,000/yr. In 2021, each of those instances bearing ANY temporal association with vaccination will inevitably be assigned as complication to vaccination by vaccine skeptics. Just as random deaths during the autumn vaccine studies were attributed to the vaccine, even though random deaths in the placebo group exceeded those in the vaccine group.

So here are a few knowns. Risk of hospitalization due to CV19 (pre-vaccine) is 4.6 per 100,000 in the general population. Of those hospitalized with Covid-19, 21% experience thrombosis with embolism. So roughly 1 person per 100,000 would contract CV19, then have a TE. To my knowledge about 200,000,000 mRNA doses have been administered, and there have been 2 or 3 reports of TE and/or HIT, i.e. roughly 1 in one hundred million.

However, the 'traditional' (AZ, J&J) vaccines have been associated with about 90 cases of thrombosis. So that's more of a concern. Both of those rely on adenoviruses. It could be that the adenovirus is triggering thrombosis. Incidence is still low, but if you're young and healthy, and you are unlucky enough to experience a TE 2° to the J&J injection, your personal incidence is 100%. Nonetheless the risk remains lower than would be the case in a CV19 infection.

When your brother in law recommends against "these" vaccines, one question worth asking is "Which "these" is he referencing?" As he's international, his experience may well be predicated on the AZ inoculum. The AZ version is not even a true CV19 vaccine and confers lower immunity, yet carries its own risks. I'd be luke-warm on it as well.
Posted by Statestreet
Gueydan
Member since Sep 2008
13883 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 6:29 am to
quote:

Well, roughly 500k more people died in 2020 than were expected given typical death rates. So if covid didn't kill them, then we've got an even bigger problem on our hands.



Deaths by suicide and overdose were way up. Thanks to the lock downs... so I guess those are covid related deaths
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
25881 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 6:36 am to
quote:

Deaths by suicide


Down nearly 6% last year from 2019 numbers
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135499 posts
Posted on 4/18/21 at 6:58 am to
quote:

Down nearly 6% last year from 2019 numbers

That number is bullshite, just so you know. The CDC has not even reported national suicide rates for 2020, much less for the pandemic extending into 2021. In the meantime, death d/t drug overdose appears to have skyrocketed. Are those accidental suicides, or deliberate? Does it matter?
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram