- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LIVE (*now adjourned*): Supreme Court hearing case on Trump's Colorado ballot eligibility
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There was a trial and the Supreme Court overruled the trial court and made the determination.
There was no finding of "guilty" as this was a civil issue (eligibility for running for office) and not a criminal issue.
I love how so many people downvote straight up facts.
Is it because you guys don't like the facts, don't understand the facts, or just don't like the person posting the facts.
1
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:18 pm to Vacherie Saint
He would be disowned now.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:18 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
I suggested Trump maybe isn’t a messiah.
Turncoat!
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:18 pm to heymama
quote:
Is it because you guys don't like the facts, don't understand the facts, or just don't like the person posting the facts.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Jesuz Christ, the frequency and nature of your posts legitimately suggests some sort of mental illness.
I'm not joking in the least, there is something legit wrong with you.
I'm not joking in the least, there is something legit wrong with you.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:22 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
Jesuz Christ, the frequency and nature of your posts legitimately suggests some sort of mental illness.
I'm not joking in the least, there is something legit wrong with you.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
It's what this board has become.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
Just answer two questions with your honest opinion.
1. Do you think bringing this to the Supreme Court has any merit under the constitution. Also was the Colorado decision constitutional?
2. Do you believe what Colorado is trying to do is politically motivated by the opposition party of that state?
1. Do you think bringing this to the Supreme Court has any merit under the constitution. Also was the Colorado decision constitutional?
2. Do you believe what Colorado is trying to do is politically motivated by the opposition party of that state?
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:25 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
suggested Trump maybe isn’t a messiah.
Oh shite. I’ll mail you the TD excommunicated certificate
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:27 pm to BOSCEAUX
Colorado didn’t bring it.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:29 pm to roadGator
quote:
Colorado didn’t bring it.
It originated in that state and their SoS was heavily involved.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:29 pm to teke184
Ron bots big mad Trump is allowed to run
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:30 pm to cwill
quote:
It's what this board has become.
Then go back to reddit.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:30 pm to BOSCEAUX
quote:
1. Do you think bringing this to the Supreme Court has any merit under the constitution.
The act of appealing (to either the COSC or USC) has merit, if that's what you're asking
quote:
Also was the Colorado decision constitutional?
No. I don't think 14A applies to the President and that's how they'll rule as the majority.
quote:
2. Do you believe what Colorado is trying to do is politically motivated by the opposition party of that state?
I think some Republicans are involved too, so not exclusively from the Democrats in CO.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No they said he isn't eligible b/c they adjudicated/ruled that he engaged in insurrection, based on the record from the trial court.
Ok so going back to what I said, is that not Colorado saying he's a bad dude so we're keeping him off the ballot?
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:31 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Dude is ate up
Ravaged by stage 4 terminal TDS.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:See, this is the wishy-washy middle ground nonsense that I was talking about in my other post (which I don’t believe you read yet).
I think some Republicans are involved too, so not exclusively from the Democrats in CO.
The non-fence sitter answer is “yes”.
The fact that there may be some Republicans who support this doesn’t in any way diminish that this was and is primarily a politically motivated ploy by the Democratic Party.
There is that “never take a side” viewpoint of yours.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:34 pm to BOSCEAUX
quote:
Do you think bringing this to the Supreme Court has any merit under the constitution.
Yes. Part of Trumps right.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:34 pm to LegalEazyE
quote:
Ravaged by stage 4 terminal TDS.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:39 pm to Scruffy
quote:
See, this is the wishy-washy middle ground nonsense that I was talking about in my other post (which I don’t believe you read yet).
The non-fence sitter answer is “yes”.
I believe Republicans (or a Republican group) are literally named plaintiffs in the suit.
quote:
The fact that there may be some Republicans who support this doesn’t in any way diminish that this was and is primarily a politically motivated ploy by the Democratic Party.
That wasn't the question. The bold part is changing the question.
quote:
There is that “never take a side” viewpoint of yours.
There isn't even a side to take.
I'm just stating literal facts. How is that taking a "side"?
Page 14 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News