heymama

quote:

---

Demonstrators today are hired agitators that are anarchist at heart. They need to be destroyed.

---

stop talking about Jan 6th for goodness sakes, give it a rest, they were peaceful patriots! :usa:

Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t the DOJ just announced they’ll investigate, but no findings, no charges, no conviction so far?

So at this time, Cook “has not been charged with any wrongdoing” but Trump has found her guilty?

quote:

---

You're missing the "fraud" part of your then when scenario.

---

you’re missing the whole due process, congressional oversight and the whole point.

quote:

---

I hate it, but burning the American flag is covered by the the 1st amendment, right?

---

Nope, this is Trump’s America, Federal overreach is in fashion. You don’t just get to do whatcha want!

quote:

---

I will only see white or Asian male right wing doctors,

---

at first I thought you were a brainwashed idiot, but I’m going to give you the benefit of the doubt - you’re gay and just enjoy the way white and Asian men give you a prostrate exam. They know what they are doing bc they are big, strong, smart men! That’s ok. You do you!

I’m curious about the PT’s thoughts / level of concern about this? Do you support what the Trump administration is proposing here? Not about birthright citizenship, but rather the way in which constitutional legal battles should be fought and resolved at the individual / class action level.

Supreme Court Weighs Nationwide Injunctions: Your Rights May Be At Risk

Lisa Remillard:
“In perhaps the most consequential case of this term, today, the justices heard more than 2 hours of oral arguments in a case to decide whether one single federal judge has the power to issue a nationwide injunction that could stop a president’s executive order. The backdrop of the question is President Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship. Birthright citizenship is a constitutional right clearly defined in the 14th amendment of the constitution and has been interpreted by Supreme Court precedent for more than 100 years. Not to mention, a law passed by congress that solidifies that precedent.

I know this sounds like a wonky legal question but I can not stress to you enough. The ruling in this case is going to affect every single person in this country and depending on how the justices rule, could allow a president to move forward with illegal or unconstitutional policies in certain parts of the country.”

quote:

---

What's becoming of that 80 yr old, is a man who loves his country and is fighting to save it.

---

actually, he’s is doing such a terrible job that I’m starting to wonder if he was sent over from the Democratic Party to destroy the GOP.

they changed the definition of “winning” when you weren’t looking.

quote:

---

I'll continue to believe Trump

---

No matter what he says or does - we know. That’s part of the problem.

WOW! Your post has all qualities of classic mental gymnastics. 4-D Chess, trust me bro! :pimp:

quote:

---

After 36 hours and more facts coming out this appears to actually be a setup by Trump administration. 1. Zero evidence of any classified material shared on app 2. App approved by CIA, used by Biden administration for 4 years 3. Zero inflammatory statements made in messages in the screenshots. If anything it showed a very measured and intelligent process 4. Every person in the group would have experience with encrypted comms, including Signal 5. JD, Pete, Tulsi. Waltz would all have strong understanding of opsec Yesterday I fell for the hysterical shrieking from the low IQ idiots who have been literally melting for 10 years. Looking at the source (The Atlantic/Goldberg), looking at the facts, looking at the players involved there is a nearly ZERO percent chance that this was an actual mistake. Not sure what the goal was but it has the qualities of a classic intelligence operation.

---