re: LIVE Candace Owens vs Andrew Wilson Debate: Over whether Israel Killed Charlie Kirk

After watching the first 10 minutes I think this debate would have been better if the trial had already been completed, that way all of the evidence from the prosecution and defense would have been presented and on the record.

Evidence

To support the claim

That he could have been

A patsy…

…. She was making some sense til that.

quote:

---

Candace says 0 percent chance he was shot and doesn’t believe that he was shot at all

---

You're lying. She said her view is 0% tyler shot him
Then she said she doesn't believe he was shot with a 30-06...but admitted some sort of projectile hit him (which includes bullets)

quote:

---

0% chance CK was shot by a 30 06 to be exact. It's obvious CK was hit by something but not a 30 06.

---

I'll take the gunsmith with years of firearms experience over Candace's "evidence" of "Utah law says I can infer".

quote:

---

but admitted some sort of projectile hit him (which includes bullets)

---

She was pretty shady about whether he was shot at all.. just “some projectile”.

Does she believe in the exploding microphone theory.

She’s going into the semantic weeds right now… she needs to move on.

Well at least we will all know what Utah 1102 is all about when this is all said and done

New Rule:

Take a shot for every utterance of inference!

:drunk:

Is PBD just gonna sit there or is he gonna moderate?

She is so dumb its unbelievable

Shoes aren’t absurd… people can change a shirt faster than a pair of shoes.