- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney will file a motion to have case thrown out
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:49 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:49 am
quote:
Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, says he will file a motion to bar another trial, after the case ended in a mistrial last week. Reddington tells CBS Mornings that motion is, in part, motivated by the alleged actions of a juror who ignored the judge’s instructions on the law.
Reddington shares his message to those spreading conspiracy theories about Patrick Clancy, the potential pardon for his client from President Trump and how Lindsay is doing today: “She’s disappointed, she’s sad.”
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 10:54 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:51 am to cajunangelle
quote:What a fricking bitch.
“She’s disappointed, she’s sad.”
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:51 am to cajunangelle
Jury selection gonna be lit.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:51 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:54 am to cajunangelle
Another juror said a group of wacko female jurors lobbied day 1 of the trial for acquittal which is also not legal.
They are told not to deliberate or discuss the evidence with each other until all the evidence has been shown and all the witnesses have testfiied.
And as far as the 1 hold out who “wouldnt follow the law” meaning he wouldnt change his vote, is how Fing juries work.
He heard all the testimony and thinks shes guilty. Oh well.
They are told not to deliberate or discuss the evidence with each other until all the evidence has been shown and all the witnesses have testfiied.
And as far as the 1 hold out who “wouldnt follow the law” meaning he wouldnt change his vote, is how Fing juries work.
He heard all the testimony and thinks shes guilty. Oh well.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 10:57 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:54 am to cajunangelle
I have determined this "case" is yet another psy-op they are pulling over our heads to further divide the people.
I refuse to believe any of this occurred, and now adamant the characters are either part of witness protection or they sold the kids off for trafficking.
I refuse to believe any of this occurred, and now adamant the characters are either part of witness protection or they sold the kids off for trafficking.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:59 am to cajunangelle
quote:
she’s sad
Better be careful everyone. Her having the sads got three babies murdered last time.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:01 am to Stat M Repairman
He wants the case thrown out, no more trials.
The jurors speaking out about the male juror holdout was the pre-show.
Even SFP would agree this was coming. Clancy gets her 1.1 million gofundme and skates.
Maybe lawyers can opine if Clancy can leave her mental health center...if the judge acts because of the social media pressure to throw it out?
The jurors speaking out about the male juror holdout was the pre-show.
Even SFP would agree this was coming. Clancy gets her 1.1 million gofundme and skates.
Maybe lawyers can opine if Clancy can leave her mental health center...if the judge acts because of the social media pressure to throw it out?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:01 am to cajunangelle
Waste of time but he gets paid.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:03 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney will file a motion to have case thrown out
Fine, do it. It's his job.
He still has to find some way to convince twelve people that
1. the Prosecution Team is wrong when they claimed that Clancy murdered her three kids, and
2. the husband is wrong when he claimed that Clancy murdered her three kids, and
3. the Defense Team is wrong when they claimed that Clancy murdered her three kids, and
4. Clancy is wrong when she claimed that she murdered her three kids
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:08 am to BeepBopBoop
Defense attorney also threw a big bucket of cold water on the mommy sleuths thinking Patrick Clancy was a part of the murder plot.
Do they have a hearing today to decide this? Or Sept 22?
Do they have a hearing today to decide this? Or Sept 22?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:08 am to cajunangelle
quote:
she’s sad
Oh shite y'all lock up the exercise bands and hide the kids!
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:11 am to cajunangelle
quote:
how Lindsay is doing today: “She’s disappointed, she’s sad.”
How are her 3 children doing today.... Oh that's right........
What kind of horseshite is this?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:11 am to cajunangelle
quote:
that motion is, in part, motivated by the alleged actions of a juror who ignored the judge’s instructions on the law
Which instructions did the juror supposedly ignore?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:13 am to cajunangelle
Doesn't want to go thru another jury selection process because the prosecution will do its best to select more males this go around.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:28 am to tigafan4life
quote:
Lindsay Clancy did not plan her children’s murders the day she did it.
She started laying the groundwork for a trial 5 months prior. How do I know? The evidence is clear if you look through a nurse’s eyes.
As an RN, the first thing we’re taught is that “if you didn’t document it, it didn’t happen” in regards to patient care. Lindsay was an L&D nurse. She heard that line in school and on every unit she ever worked.
Callan was only a few months old when she began “seeking treatment”. She told doctors she was depressed and anxious. She did not tell them she was suicidal or homicidal. She knew exactly what those words do. One statement of intent to harm herself or the kids and she is in a locked unit. If they even suspected she wanted to hurt anyone, it would have unleashed a chain reaction that would prevent her from completing her plan. She wanted freedom and she knew just what lines not to cross to reach that goal.
What she did do was write it down. Diary entries. Texts. Conversations with her husband and her mother. Thoughts of harming herself and the children. That paper trail exists for a reason. It is the documentation she knew a future jury would see.
For months the pattern held: disclose the dark thoughts to family and to a journal. Minimize or deny them to the people who could actually help.
Cycle through providers. We call that “doctor shopping” in the medical world and it’s a clear indicator of someone who wants specific medicines or is trying to avoid coordination between doctors. She KNEW the system and exactly how to use it.
Collect prescriptions. Zoloft, Prozac, Seroquel, Valium, Klonopin, Ativan, Lamictal, amitriptyline—thirteen medications, more than thirty prescriptions. A nurse knows which side effects to report to get a med changed or dose adjusted. The list itself became the evidence she wanted. We don’t know if she ever took any of them except on the day of the crime.
As a mom, if I were having actual thoughts of hurting my kids, I’d be the first one screaming it to every doctor, every nurse. I’d make sure I was locked away where I couldn’t actually hurt them. But not Lindsay. She did all she could to not be locked away.
When the Women & Infants postpartum program discharged her after one day because she didn’t fit the criteria, the calendar was not on her side. Callan was eight months old. The cleanest “postpartum psychosis” window was already gone. She had to execute sooner rather than later.
She planned it to the minute. As a nurse, she knew exactly how long it would take to strangle each child—about six minutes. She sent her husband on errands that would keep him out of the house long enough to kill all three and stage what was supposed to look like a suicide attempt.
Her medical education ensured she knew EXACTLY how deep and what direction to cut her wrists to ensure she wouldn’t bleed out. She knew EXACTLY how deep and where to cut her neck to avoid hitting the carotid arteries, the jugular veins, or compromise her airway. She even knew jumping out a 2nd story window wouldn’t be fatal but would look dramatic to a future jury. Every cut, every decision was calculated, cold, and with the medical training to execute the plan flawlessly (the injuries she sustained were a miscalculation from landing wrong, not the fall itself).
Lindsay Clancy is not a woman who “snapped with no warning.” or even one who was failed by her family and the healthcare system. She is a woman who spent months building a file and setting the stage so she could blame her crime on those very people while she could live out the childless life she dreamed of living.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:46 am to cajunangelle
Good post... thanks.
What i don't understand. Is she insane or simply suffered a temporary psychosis (PPD)? I thought I've read "psychosis" is her defense, so, how does the insane claim work in this case? Is she "sane" now?
FWIW, I think she knew exactly what she was doing and is using PPD as a cover for just being a selfish evil bitch that was tired of taking care of the 3 children she bore.
quote:
AI Overview
Under Massachusetts law, a person with a severe mental disease or defect is found "not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility" rather than guilty.
Serpa Law Office
+1
The Legal Standard
Massachusetts uses the term lack of criminal responsibility instead of the traditional insanity defense.
Benzaken, Sheehan & Wood, LLP
+1
A defendant is not criminally responsible if, at the time of the offense, a mental disease or defect caused them to lack the substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of their conduct, or to conform their conduct to the requirements of the law.
This standard comes from the landmark case Commonwealth v. McHoul.
Serpa Law Office
+1
Burden of Proof
Once the defense introduces evidence raising the issue of mental impairment, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was sane and criminally responsible at the time of the crime.
The defendant does not have the burden of proving they were insane.
Law Offices of Lefteris K. Travayiakis, P.C.
+2
What Happens After the Verdict?
A verdict of not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility is not a full release.
The individual is typically committed to a state mental hospital for evaluation and treatment.
Release requires proving to a court that the person is no longer mentally ill or dangerous.
The Law Office of Kevin R. Collins
+1
What i don't understand. Is she insane or simply suffered a temporary psychosis (PPD)? I thought I've read "psychosis" is her defense, so, how does the insane claim work in this case? Is she "sane" now?
FWIW, I think she knew exactly what she was doing and is using PPD as a cover for just being a selfish evil bitch that was tired of taking care of the 3 children she bore.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:56 am to dalefla
quote:Will the judge throw the case out? Or accept a defense plea, which is where this is all going.
The next formal step to determine the future of the Lindsay Clancy case is scheduled for Tuesday, September 29, 2026. [1] (LINK the declaration of a mistrial on September 4, 2026, due to a deadlocked jury,
Judge William Sullivan set this upcoming date for a status and trial assignment hearing. During this proceeding, the Plymouth County District Attorney's office and the defense will reconvene to discuss next steps, including whether prosecutors officially decide to pursue a retrial with a new jury or negotiate a potential plea agreement. [1] (LINK
Or will the judge feel pressure from the media onslaught and attn whore defense lawyer?
Unless the judge cites impropriaty of defense making a spectacle and putting a target on the holdout juror. This clown show is won by the defense.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:13 pm to cajunangelle
That is not how mistrials work. The decision lies with the District Attorney.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:16 pm to ELVIS U
quote:
That is not how mistrials work. The decision lies with the District Attorney.
If I’m the DA, I push to sanction the defense attorney for his grandstanding bullshite in the press such as this and asking Trump for a pardon.
Popular
Back to top


17




.jpg)




