- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let’s go back over Trump’s wild post, shall we…
Posted on 7/14/25 at 8:41 pm to Placekicker
Posted on 7/14/25 at 8:41 pm to Placekicker
Oh ffs.
It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they have been fooled.
It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they have been fooled.
1
Posted on 7/14/25 at 8:42 pm to L1C4
It’s even easier when people fool themselves. And I ain’t talking about the person to whom you replied.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 8:43 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
it makes perfect sense if you’re retarded.
Lucky for you, you are.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 8:58 pm to davyjones
quote:
Why shut up and let that particular theory go? Probably because that didn’t happen, would be my best guess.
Well the people who are parroting that theory havent gotten that realization yet.
In their defense that theory is essentially directly from Trump who simultaneously wants people to shut up.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 9:00 pm to davyjones
quote:
Exactly which ones are we insinuating, and committed exactly what violation of American law (enforceable under American jurisdiction)? I’m not asking this in a sarcastic, rhetorical way, it’s a serious question. Because you can’t start from the jump making these type vague assumptions without having some idea of relative specificity. Which incidentally is a different way of describing, under American law, what’s required to initiate a specific investigation into a specific target - reasonable suspicion. And reasonable suspicion requires at a minimum a named target and at least basic factual support that xyz specific crime(s) were committed.
Everyone seems so certain, yet not a specific certain target and his specific violation of enforceable American law.
Donald Trump claimed Obama, Biden and others by name in his tweet deleted/added evidence
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 9:12 pm
Posted on 7/14/25 at 9:05 pm to CastleBravo
quote:
I would bet $100 Trump's name was put into those files maliciously by the previous administration.
You think they added his name after he saw the list and surely copied it?
Think about how silly that is. If it was true then, now that Trump is in power, he can erase his name and put “Gavin Newsome”.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 7/14/25 at 9:09 pm to Placekicker
If Trump was on the list do you not think that the Libtard’s would have released the list before the election.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 9:13 pm to Penrod
Plus if they actually went to that bizarre extent to add his name, they’d have done so for no other cognizable reason than to have released it themselves, or more likely “leaked” it.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 9:33 pm to davyjones
quote:
Exactly which ones are we insinuating, and committed exactly what violation of American law (enforceable under American jurisdiction)?
Trump directly named Clinton, Obama and Brennan as part of a conspiracy to manufacture this narrative, it’s in his post on Truth Social referenced by the OP.
I was responding to a post here suggesting that his enemies had destroyed or altered evidence in a federal investigation to cover this up which is why he wants to move on.
The destruction of evidence in what would be the biggest DOJ scandal since watergate and according to that premise would implicate the Biden admin as well.
It’s also a federal felony under
18 U.S. Code § 1519 that carries with it a 20 year prison sentence.
So again, if that’s what happened outstanding, prosecute Garland and whoever the hell the federal prosecutor was who was holding the files until they give up who orchestrated the cover up, it’s not hard to identify who had access if you’re the president or AG and are so inclined.
But that’s not what he said was going to happen. He threw out a vague allegation without any evidence to support the claim at a time when he’s getting mauled for scolding his base for daring to ask WTF is going on and then after making criminal claims against his enemies he again tells us to ignore it and move on.
That’s not how we clean up DC.
If people are raping kids you investigate it whether it’s convenient to your donors or some “allied” nation or not.
If your enemies are burying cases you laugh, bury them for it then try to bury whoever was raping the kids.
We’ve been told for almost 5 years to “just wait”… no. Go ******* arrest these people for any of the litany of things they’ve done or stop expecting anyone to take the administration seriously when they scream about conspiracies or how they’re trying to lock him up.
No ****, they’re trying to go after him and anyone near him so stop taking advice from Lyndsay Graham and punch someone back or enjoy being a lame duck while the base tries to find someone who wants to do more than send angry tweets like they’re Trey Gowdy with a Twitter account.
It’s a cold civil war, stop turning the other cheek and do something about it.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 9:34 pm to davyjones
You clearly think that the manipulated evidence theory is illogical at best and idiotic at worst.
Well per his tweet that’s what Don believes.
Do you think he is illogical or idiotic?
If no then why do you think he thinks that little of his base that he would peddle that theory?
Well per his tweet that’s what Don believes.
Do you think he is illogical or idiotic?
If no then why do you think he thinks that little of his base that he would peddle that theory?
Posted on 7/14/25 at 9:44 pm to Adam Banks
What I’m simply saying, and yes there is wisdom in sometimes foregoing lengthy posts because the central point can be diluted and lost, is that you don’t proceed with pursuing that which you (as the decision maker-s) are convinced the necessary evidence doesn’t exist. We’re never going to get all the information on everything that goes into such decisions one way or another, and IMO it’s not unreasonable to expect folks to understand that.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 9:48 pm to davyjones
So he claims without evidence that multiple prior American presidents manipulated evidence to conceal pedophilia(or frame others) and he (and apparently you) expects people’s reaction to be
Hmmm ok wow that’s crazy let’s move on!
You don’t think that warrants “we are looking into any avenue to determine who did this and how we can recover the previous evidence”?
You don’t think that claim warrants at least SOME evidence at all?
If he thinks he can drop that claim and then say stop talking about it he thinks his followers are idiots.
Dropping the subject is a completely illogical response to what he claims
Hmmm ok wow that’s crazy let’s move on!
You don’t think that warrants “we are looking into any avenue to determine who did this and how we can recover the previous evidence”?
You don’t think that claim warrants at least SOME evidence at all?
If he thinks he can drop that claim and then say stop talking about it he thinks his followers are idiots.
Dropping the subject is a completely illogical response to what he claims
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 9:54 pm
Posted on 7/14/25 at 10:01 pm to tide06
quote:???
premise is that Hillary created the Epstein scandal which implicated her own husband
C'mon....Bill fukd anything he wanted and most earthlings were just envious..
Plus he played the saxophone. Most men wanted to be him and most women wanted to fuk him.
Doesn't make you a good politician........makes you a great politician.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 10:02 pm to Placekicker
Feels like Trump takes MAGA to the circus every day and shows them different things that seem fascinating.
Today it was the bearded lady and then the shrunken head.
Today it was the bearded lady and then the shrunken head.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 10:05 pm to Placekicker
Written like a true senile old man who’s fallen down conspiracy rabbit holes. Pretty soon he’s gonna start forwarding you emails he got
Posted on 7/14/25 at 10:31 pm to DavidTheGnome
I would give it a solid B+ at Q-strology school.
It's missing the gematria, and classic stock phrases, but it has most of the other marks of good q-rhetoric - treating a poast like a sacred text, reading secret intent into ordinary phrasing, infinite deferral of judgement, justifying vagueness as evidence of an apocolyptic battle, turning division within the movement into evidence of an enemy trap. Well done.
It's missing the gematria, and classic stock phrases, but it has most of the other marks of good q-rhetoric - treating a poast like a sacred text, reading secret intent into ordinary phrasing, infinite deferral of judgement, justifying vagueness as evidence of an apocolyptic battle, turning division within the movement into evidence of an enemy trap. Well done.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 10:34 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
good q-rhetoric
quote:
TigerDoc
I find it amusing when people that fell wholeheartedly in love with one fake news conspiracy then mock others for falling for conspiracy theories.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 7/14/25 at 10:37 pm to BBONDS25
Not at all - as we all know, conspiracy theories are just spoilers. I'm a fan of this baw's prose style, sirrah.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 10:38 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
A sitting government wiping criminal files to hide pedophilia.
So we are just going to pretend that very same group in govt didnt whip up a Russian collusion criminal file out of nowhere, to go after a private citizen, running to displace their firm hold on govt?
Yeah, a sitting govt would never do something like that!!! With the help of Obama, Brennan, Comey and Hillary. Exactly who Trump named in his post
Lulz
Posted on 7/14/25 at 10:40 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
turning division within the movement into evidence of an enemy trap
These people are 0 for 89 on this one.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News